The ITS region as a target for characterization of fungal communities using emerging sequencing technologies.

The advent of new high-throughput DNA-sequencing technologies promises to redefine the way in which fungi and fungal communities--as well as other groups of organisms--are studied in their natural environment. With read lengths of some few hundred base pairs, massively parallel sequencing (pyrosequencing) stands out among the new technologies as the most apt for large-scale species identification in environmental samples. Although parallel pyrosequencing can generate hundreds of thousands of sequences at an exceptional speed, the limited length of the reads may pose a problem to the species identification process. This study explores whether the discrepancy in read length between parallel pyrosequencing and traditional (Sanger) sequencing will have an impact on the perceived taxonomic affiliation of the underlying species. Based on all 39,200 publicly available fungal environmental DNA sequences representing the nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, the results show that the two approaches give rise to quite different views of the diversity of the underlying samples. Standardization of which subregion from the ITS region should be sequenced, as well as a recognition that the composition of fungal communities as depicted through different sequencing methods need not be directly comparable, appear crucial to the integration of the new sequencing technologies with current mycological praxis.

[1]  T. Bruns,et al.  Fungal networks made of humans: UNITE, FESIN, and frontiers in fungal ecology. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[2]  J. Moncalvo,et al.  Fruiting body and soil rDNA sampling detects complementary assemblage of Agaricomycotina (Basidiomycota, Fungi) in a hemlock‐dominated forest plot in southern Ontario , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[3]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Taxonomic Reliability of DNA Sequences in Public Sequence Databases: A Fungal Perspective , 2006, PloS one.

[4]  Hanlee P. Ji,et al.  Next-generation DNA sequencing , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[5]  H. Nusbaum,et al.  Beringian origins and cryptic speciation events in the fly agaric (Amanita muscaria) , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[6]  R. Vilgalys,et al.  Organization of ribosomal DNA in the basidiomycete Thanatephorus praticola , 1990, Current Genetics.

[7]  Robert L Strausberg,et al.  Emerging DNA sequencing technologies for human genomic medicine. , 2008, Drug discovery today.

[8]  John Quackenbush,et al.  What would you do if you could sequence everything? , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Approaching the taxonomic affiliation of unidentified sequences in public databases – an example from the mycorrhizal fungi , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[10]  Erik Kristiansson,et al.  Mining metadata from unidentified ITS sequences in GenBank: A case study in Inocybe (Basidiomycota) , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[11]  M. Metzker Emerging technologies in DNA sequencing. , 2005, Genome research.

[12]  D. Hibbett,et al.  Research Coordination Networks: a phylogeny for kingdom Fungi (Deep Hypha) , 2006, Mycologia.

[13]  D. Hawksworth The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited * * Paper presented at , 2001 .

[14]  Richard P. Shefferson,et al.  Evolutionary studies of ectomycorrhizal fungi: recent advances and future directions , 2004 .

[15]  J. Rosselló,et al.  Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[16]  D. Hibbett,et al.  After the gold rush, or before the flood? Evolutionary morphology of mushroom-forming fungi (Agaricomycetes) in the early 21st century. , 2007, Mycological research.

[17]  Nils Hallenberg,et al.  Preserving accuracy in GenBank , 2008 .

[18]  N. Hallenberg,et al.  Phylogenetic studies in Hypochnicium (Basidiomycota), with special emphasis on species from New Zealand , 2007 .

[19]  R. Knight,et al.  Accurate taxonomy assignments from 16S rRNA sequences produced by highly parallel pyrosequencers , 2008, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  A. Coleman Is there a molecular key to the level of "biological species" in eukaryotes? A DNA guide. , 2009, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[21]  Thomas Dandekar,et al.  5.8S-28S rRNA interaction and HMM-based ITS2 annotation. , 2009, Gene.

[22]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Intraspecific ITS Variability in the Kingdom Fungi as Expressed in the International Sequence Databases and Its Implications for Molecular Species Identification , 2008, Evolutionary bioinformatics online.

[23]  M. Bidartondo,et al.  How to know unknown fungi: the role of a herbarium. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[24]  Erik Kristiansson,et al.  An outlook on the fungal internal transcribed spacer sequences in GenBank and the introduction of a web-based tool for the exploration of fungal diversity. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[25]  Robin Sen,et al.  UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[26]  Tobias Müller,et al.  The ITS2 Database II: homology modelling RNA structure for molecular systematics , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Pedro W. Crous,et al.  MycoBank: an online initiative to launch mycology into the 21st century , 2004 .