Sampling of the native conformational ensemble of myoglobin via structures in different crystalline environments

Proteins sample multiple conformational substates in their native environment, but the process of crystallization selects the conformers that allow for close packing. The population of conformers can be shifted by varying the environment through a range of crystallization conditions, often resulting in different space groups and changes in the packing arrangements. Three high resolution structures of myoglobin (Mb) in different crystal space groups are presented, including one in a new space group P6122 and two structures in space groups P212121 and P6. We compare coordinates and anisotropic displacement parameters (ADPs) from these three structures plus an existing structure in space group P21. While the overall changes are small, there is substantial variation in several external regions with varying patterns of crystal contacts across the space group packing arrangements. The structural ensemble containing four different crystal forms displays greater conformational variance (Cα rmsd of 0.54–0.79 Å) in comparison to a collection of four Mb structures with different ligands and mutations in the same crystal form (Cα rmsd values of 0.28–0.37 Å). The high resolution of the data enables comparison of both the magnitudes and directions of ADPs, which are found to be suppressed by crystal contacts. A composite dynamic profile of Mb structural variation from the four structures was compared with an independent structural ensemble developed from NMR refinement. Despite the limitations and biases of each method, the ADPs of the crystallographic ensemble closely match the positional variance from the solution NMR ensemble with linear correlation of 0.8. This suggests that crystal packing selects conformers representative of the solution ensemble, and several different crystal forms give a more complete view of the plasticity of a protein structure. Proteins 2008. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[2]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[3]  S. Sligar,et al.  Crystal structure of myoglobin form a synthetic gene , 1990, Proteins.

[4]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Unveiling functional protein motions with picosecond x-ray crystallography and molecular dynamics simulations. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  M. Teeter,et al.  Myoglobin cavities provide interior ligand pathway , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  B. Matthews,et al.  Protein flexibility and adaptability seen in 25 crystal forms of T4 lysozyme. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Gerhard Hummer,et al.  Multi-basin dynamics of a protein in a crystal environment , 1997 .

[8]  M. Karplus,et al.  Multiple conformational states of proteins: a molecular dynamics analysis of myoglobin. , 1987, Science.

[9]  J. Olson,et al.  Structure of myoglobin-ethyl isocyanide. Histidine as a swinging door for ligand entry. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Georgia Hadjipavlou,et al.  Linkage between dynamics and catalysis in a thermophilic-mesophilic enzyme pair , 2004, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[11]  C. M. Jones,et al.  Conformational relaxation and ligand binding in myoglobin. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[12]  M. A. Wilson,et al.  The 1.0 A crystal structure of Ca(2+)-bound calmodulin: an analysis of disorder and implications for functionally relevant plasticity. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  P. Wolynes,et al.  The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. , 1991, Science.

[14]  George N Phillips,et al.  Roles of static and dynamic domains in stability and catalysis of adenylate kinase , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  M. Billeter,et al.  MOLMOL: a program for display and analysis of macromolecular structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular graphics.

[16]  G. Sheldrick,et al.  SHELXL: high-resolution refinement. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[17]  M. DePristo,et al.  Heterogeneity and inaccuracy in protein structures solved by X-ray crystallography. , 2004, Structure.

[18]  P E Wright,et al.  Solution structure of carbonmonoxy myoglobin determined from nuclear magnetic resonance distance and chemical shift constraints. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[19]  C. Cambillau,et al.  Packing forces in nine crystal forms of cutinase , 1998, Proteins.

[20]  Aleksandr V. Smirnov,et al.  Watching a Protein as it Functions with 150-ps Time-Resolved X-ray Crystallography , 2003, Science.

[21]  H Frauenfelder,et al.  Variations on a theme by Debye and Waller: From simple crystals to proteins , 1997, Proteins.

[22]  G. Phillips,et al.  Kinetic proofreading by the cavity system of myoglobin: protection from poisoning. , 2004, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[23]  E A Merritt,et al.  Comparing anisotropic displacement parameters in protein structures. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[24]  H. Berendsen,et al.  Domain motions in bacteriophage T4 lysozyme: A comparison between molecular dynamics and crystallographic data , 1998, Proteins.

[25]  D E McRee,et al.  XtalView/Xfit--A versatile program for manipulating atomic coordinates and electron density. , 1999, Journal of structural biology.

[26]  Jack D. Dunitz,et al.  Atomic Dispacement Parameter Nomenclature. Report of a Subcommittee on Atomic Displacement Parameter Nomenclature , 1996 .

[27]  D. Bar-Sagi,et al.  The structural basis for the transition from Ras-GTP to Ras-GDP , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  M. DePristo,et al.  Relation between native ensembles and experimental structures of proteins. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  F. Schotte,et al.  Time-dependent atomic coordinates for the dissociation of carbon monoxide from myoglobin. , 2006, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[30]  H Frauenfelder,et al.  Dynamics of ligand binding to myoglobin. , 1975, Biochemistry.

[31]  Andrea Amadei,et al.  Extended molecular dynamics simulation of the carbon monoxide migration in sperm whale myoglobin. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[32]  B. Schoenborn,et al.  Neutron diffraction study of carbonmonoxymyoglobin. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  G. Phillips,et al.  Comparison of the dynamics of myoglobin in different crystal forms. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[34]  Hans Frauenfelder,et al.  Temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction as a probe of protein structural dynamics , 1979, Nature.

[35]  B M Pettitt,et al.  Characterizing global substates of myoglobin. , 1998, Structure.

[36]  G. Hummer,et al.  Conformational dynamics of cytochrome c: Correlation to hydrogen exchange , 1999, Proteins.

[37]  S. Yau,et al.  Solvent entropy contribution to the free energy of protein crystallization. , 2002, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[38]  J. B. Johnson,et al.  Rebinding and relaxation in the myoglobin pocket. , 1987, Biophysical chemistry.

[39]  P. Rogers,et al.  A third quaternary structure of human hemoglobin A at 1.7-A resolution. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[40]  R. G. Hart,et al.  Structure of Myoglobin: A Three-Dimensional Fourier Synthesis at 2 Å. Resolution , 1960, Nature.

[41]  R J Read,et al.  Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. , 1998, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[42]  K. Hellingwerf,et al.  Conformational substates in different crystal forms of the photoactive yellow protein—Correlation with theoretical and experimental flexibility , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[43]  M. Ikeda-Saito,et al.  Nitric oxide myoglobin: Crystal structure and analysis of ligand geometry , 1998, Proteins.

[44]  M. DePristo,et al.  Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics , 2005, Nature.

[45]  J. Soman,et al.  Ligand pathways in myoglobin: A review of trp cavity mutations , 2007, IUBMB life.

[46]  G. Kachalova,et al.  A steric mechanism for inhibition of CO binding to heme proteins. , 1999, Science.

[47]  G. Phillips,et al.  Crystal structures of Bacillus stearothermophilus adenylate kinase with bound Ap5A, Mg2+ Ap5A, and Mn2+ Ap5A reveal an intermediate lid position and six coordinate octahedral geometry for bound Mg2+ and Mn2+ , 1998, Proteins.

[48]  A. Miele,et al.  Analysis of the effect of microgravity on protein crystal quality: the case of a myoglobin triple mutant. , 2003, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[49]  M. Karplus,et al.  Native proteins are surface-molten solids: application of the Lindemann criterion for the solid versus liquid state. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[50]  F. Yang,et al.  Crystal structures of CO-, deoxy- and met-myoglobins at various pH values. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  Sharon Hammes-Schiffer,et al.  Impact of distal mutations on the network of coupled motions correlated to hydride transfer in dihydrofolate reductase. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.