Electric and acoustic harmonic integration predicts speech-in-noise performance in hybrid cochlear implant users

Background: Pitch perception of complex tones relies on place or temporal fine structure‐based mechanisms from resolved harmonics and the temporal envelope of unresolved harmonics. Combining this information is essential for speech‐in‐noise performance, as it allows segregation of a target speaker from background noise. In hybrid cochlear implant (H‐CI) users, low frequency acoustic hearing should provide pitch from resolved harmonics while high frequency electric hearing should provide temporal envelope pitch from unresolved harmonics. How the acoustic and electric auditory inputs interact for H‐CI users is largely unknown. Harmonicity and inharmonicity are emergent features of sound in which overtones are concordant or discordant with the fundamental frequency. We hypothesized that some H‐CI users would be able to integrate acoustic and electric information for complex tone pitch perception, and that this ability would be correlated with speech‐in‐noise performance. In this study, we used perception of inharmonicity to demonstrate this integration. Methods: Fifteen H‐CI users with only acoustic hearing below 500 Hz, only electric hearing above 2 kHz, and more than 6 months CI experience, along with eighteen normal hearing (NH) controls, were presented with harmonic and inharmonic sounds. The stimulus was created with a low frequency component, corresponding with the H‐CI user's acoustic hearing (fundamental frequency between 125 and 174 Hz), and a high frequency component, corresponding with electric hearing. Subjects were asked to identify the more inharmonic sound, which requires the perceptual integration of the low and high components. Speech‐in‐noise performance was tested in both groups using the California Consonant Test (CCT), and perception of Consonant‐Nucleus‐Consonant (CNC) words in quiet and AzBio sentences in noise were tested for the H‐CI users. Results: Eight of the H‐CI subjects (53%), and all of the NH subjects, scored significantly above chance level for at least one subset of the inharmonicity detection task. Inharmonicity detection ability, but not age or pure tone average, predicted speech scores in a linear model. These results were significantly correlated with speech scores in both quiet and noise for H‐CI users, but not with speech in noise performance for NH listeners. Musical experience predicted inharmonicity detection ability, but did not predict speech performance. Conclusions: We demonstrate integration of acoustic and electric information in H‐CI users for complex pitch sensation. The correlation with speech scores in H‐CI users might be associated with the ability to segregate a target speaker from background noise using the speaker's fundamental frequency. HighlightsAcoustic and electric (A + E) integration occurs in hybrid cochlear implant users.A + E integration ability predicts speech‐in‐noise performance for hybrid CI users.Musical experience, but not PTA or current age, predicts A + E integration ability.

[1]  Robert P. Carlyon,et al.  Effects of Harmonicity and Regularity on the Perception of Sound Sources , 2008 .

[2]  The Effect of Cochlear Damage on the Sensitivity to Harmonicity , 2017, Ear and hearing.

[3]  Michael F Dorman,et al.  Development and Validation of the AzBio Sentence Lists , 2012, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  The harmonic organization of auditory cortex , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[5]  C. M. Marin,et al.  Concurrent vowel identification II: Effects of phase, harmonicity and task , 1997 .

[6]  Mounya Elhilali,et al.  Impaired perception of temporal fine structure and musical timbre in cochlear implant users , 2011, Hearing Research.

[7]  Jong Ho Won,et al.  Clinical evaluation of music perception, appraisal and experience in cochlear implant users , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[8]  Christopher J. Plack,et al.  Perceptual Consequences of “Hidden” Hearing Loss , 2014, Trends in hearing.

[9]  Xiaoqin Wang,et al.  Harmonic template neurons in primate auditory cortex underlying complex sound processing , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  R Plomp,et al.  Beats of mistuned consonances. , 1967, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  R. Meddis,et al.  A unitary model of pitch perception. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  R. Carlyon,et al.  The psychophysics of concurrent sound segregation. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[13]  J M Brunstrom,et al.  Perceptual segregation and pitch shifts of mistuned components in harmonic complexes and in regular inharmonic complexes. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  T. Dau,et al.  Investigating Interaural Frequency-Place Mismatches via Bimodal Vowel Integration , 2014, Trends in hearing.

[15]  C. Turner,et al.  Plasticity in human pitch perception induced by tonotopically mismatched electro-acoustic stimulation , 2014, Neuroscience.

[16]  Donald K. Eddington,et al.  Depth of Electrode Insertion and Postoperative Performance in Humans with Cochlear Implants: A Histopathologic Study , 2010, Audiology and Neurotology.

[17]  Robert P. Carlyon,et al.  On the perceptual limits of octave harmony and their origin , 1991 .

[18]  E. Owens,et al.  Development of the California Consonant Test. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  Bruce J Gantz,et al.  Multicenter clinical trial of the Nucleus Hybrid S8 cochlear implant: Final outcomes , 2016, The Laryngoscope.

[20]  B. Moore,et al.  A Test for the Diagnosis of Dead Regions in the Cochlea , 2000, British journal of audiology.

[21]  Tobias Rader,et al.  Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects , 2017, Hearing Research.

[22]  D. Wozny,et al.  Abnormal Binaural Spectral Integration in Cochlear Implant Users , 2014, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.