Brain Mapping Data: Classification, Principal Components and Multidimensional Scaling

Brain mapping data consists of 3D images of brain function (blood flow or blood oxygenation dependent response), or brain anatomy (MRI images), repeated under different experimental conditions and over different subjects. We can regard the image values, sampled at up to 500,000 voxels, as a very high dimensional multivariate observation, but a better approach is to model them as a continuous function or random field. The result of the statistical analysis is an image of test statistics, and our main interest is how to deal with them. We use a topological quantity, the Euler characteristic of the excursion set of a random field, as a tool to test for localised changes. The data is highly non-isotropic, that is, the effective smoothness is not constant across the image, so the usual random field theory does not apply. We propose a solution that warps the data to isotropy using local multidimensional scaling. Recent theoretical work has shown that the subsequent corrections to the random field theory can be done without actually doing the warping (Taylor and Adler, 2002). We shall apply these methods to a set of 151 brain images from the Human Brain Mapping data base.

[1]  A. R. McIntosh,et al.  An Examination of the Effects of Stimulus Type, Encoding Task, and Functional Connectivity on the Role of Right Prefrontal Cortex in Recognition Memory , 2001, NeuroImage.

[2]  R. Adler,et al.  The Geometry of Random Fields , 1982 .

[3]  K. Worsley,et al.  The geometry of correlation fields with an application to functional connectivity of the brain , 1999 .

[4]  Robert J. Adler,et al.  Euler characteristics for Gaussian fields on manifolds , 2003 .

[5]  K. Worsley,et al.  THE DETECTION OF LOCAL SHAPE CHANGES VIA THE GEOMETRY OF HOTELLING’S T 2 FIELDS 1 , 1999 .

[6]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging , 1997, NeuroImage.

[7]  R. Adler On excursion sets, tube formulas and maxima of random fields , 2000 .

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visual Search: Regional Segregations within the Frontal Eye Fields and Effective Connectivity of the Superior Colliculus , 2002, NeuroImage.

[9]  Ingrid S. Johnsrude,et al.  Can Meaningful Effective Connectivities Be Obtained between Auditory Cortical Regions? , 2001, NeuroImage.

[10]  Lars Kai Hansen,et al.  The Quantitative Evaluation of Functional Neuroimaging Experiments: The NPAIRS Data Analysis Framework , 2000, NeuroImage.

[11]  K. Worsley,et al.  Local Maxima and the Expected Euler Characteristic of Excursion Sets of χ 2, F and t Fields , 1994, Advances in Applied Probability.

[12]  Gary F. Egan,et al.  Abnormal Functional Connectivity in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder , 2002, NeuroImage.

[13]  K. Worsley,et al.  Boundary corrections for the expected Euler characteristic of excursion sets of random fields, with an application to astrophysics , 1995, Advances in Applied Probability.