Indexing the approximate number system.

Much recent research attention has focused on understanding individual differences in the approximate number system, a cognitive system believed to underlie human mathematical competence. To date researchers have used four main indices of ANS acuity, and have typically assumed that they measure similar properties. Here we report a study which questions this assumption. We demonstrate that the numerical ratio effect has poor test-retest reliability and that it does not relate to either Weber fractions or accuracy on nonsymbolic comparison tasks. Furthermore, we show that Weber fractions follow a strongly skewed distribution and that they have lower test-retest reliability than a simple accuracy measure. We conclude by arguing that in the future researchers interested in indexing individual differences in ANS acuity should use accuracy figures, not Weber fractions or numerical ratio effects.

[1]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Symbolic arithmetic knowledge without instruction , 2007, Nature.

[2]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  The role of the left intraparietal sulcus in the relationship between symbolic number processing and children's arithmetic competence , 2012, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Intuitive sense of number correlates with math scores on college-entrance examination. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[4]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  A Computational Model of Number Comparison , 2020, Proceedings of the Twenty First Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.

[5]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Nonsymbolic Arithmetic in Adults and Young Children , 2003 .

[6]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[7]  R. Church,et al.  A mode control model of counting and timing processes. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[8]  Bert De Smedt,et al.  Numerical Magnitude Representations and Individual Differences in Children's Arithmetic Strategy Use , 2012 .

[9]  Sian L. Beilock,et al.  Numerical ordering ability mediates the relation between number-sense and arithmetic competence , 2011, Cognition.

[10]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Automatic quantity processing in 5-year olds and adults , 2008, Cognitive Processing.

[11]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  A Two-Minute Paper-and-Pencil Test of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Numerical Magnitude Processing Explains Variability in Primary School Children's Arithmetic Competence , 2013, PloS one.

[12]  B. Reynvoet,et al.  Predictors for Mathematics Achievement? Evidence From a Longitudinal Study , 2012 .

[13]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number-space mappings: what underlies mathematics achievement? , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[14]  Anthony J Bishara,et al.  Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[15]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Impaired acuity of the approximate number system underlies mathematical learning disability (dyscalculia). , 2011, Child development.

[16]  Janosch Linkersdörfer,et al.  Symbolic and non-symbolic distance effects in children and their connection with arithmetic skills , 2011, Journal of Neurolinguistics.

[17]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Non-verbal number acuity correlates with symbolic mathematics achievement: But only in children , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[19]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[20]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. , 2011, Developmental science.

[21]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  Nonsymbolic number and cumulative area representations contribute shared and unique variance to symbolic math competence , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[22]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The interplay between nonsymbolic number and its continuous visual properties. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[23]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Measuring the Approximate Number System , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[24]  Xinlin Zhou,et al.  Cognitive correlates of performance in advanced mathematics. , 2012, The British journal of educational psychology.

[25]  Alain Content,et al.  Judgement of discrete and continuous quantity in adults: Number counts! , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[26]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Variability signatures distinguish verbal from nonverbal counting for both large and small numbers , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[27]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Continuous visual properties explain neural responses to nonsymbolic number. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[29]  C. Gilmore,et al.  Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[30]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[31]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[32]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Developmental trajectory of number acuity reveals a severe impairment in developmental dyscalculia , 2010, Cognition.

[33]  C. Kowalski.  On the Effects of Non‐Normality on the Distribution of the Sample Product‐Moment Correlation Coefficient , 1972 .

[34]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best Practices in Data Transformation: The Overlooked Effect of Minimum Values , 2008 .

[35]  Stella F. Lourenco,et al.  The approximate number system and its relation to early math achievement: evidence from the preschool years. , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[36]  Neil Marlow,et al.  Individual Differences in Inhibitory Control, Not Non-Verbal Number Acuity, Correlate with Mathematics Achievement , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  L. Aiken.  Psychological testing and assessment , 1976 .

[38]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Preschoolers' Precision of the Approximate Number System Predicts Later School Mathematics Performance , 2011, PloS one.

[39]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Challenging the reliability and validity of cognitive measures: the case of the numerical distance effect. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[40]  Matthew Inglis,et al.  Sampling from the mental number line: How are approximate number system representations formed? , 2013, Cognition.

[41]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Using eye tracking to study numerical cognition: the case of the ratio effect , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Lieven Verschaffel,et al.  Do numerical magnitude comparison skills predict individual differences in mathematical achievement , 2009 .

[43]  Evelyn H. Kroesbergen,et al.  Early Numerical Development and the Role of Non-Symbolic and Symbolic Skills. , 2013 .

[44]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Number sense across the lifespan as revealed by a massive Internet-based sample , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[45]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Nonsymbolic numerical magnitude comparison: reliability and validity of different task variants and outcome measures, and their relationship to arithmetic achievement in adults. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[46]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Mapping numerical magnitudes onto symbols: the numerical distance effect and individual differences in children's mathematics achievement. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[47]  Jacqueline Leybaert,et al.  Does math education modify the approximate number system? A comparison of schooled and unschooled adults , 2013, Trends in Neuroscience and Education.

[48]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Sometimes area counts more than number , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[49]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Nicole M. McNeil,et al.  ANS acuity and mathematics ability in preschoolers from low-income homes: contributions of inhibitory control. , 2013, Developmental science.

[51]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Individual differences in non-verbal number acuity correlate with maths achievement , 2008, Nature.

[52]  Silke M. Göbel,et al.  Impact of High Mathematics Education on the Number Sense , 2012, PloS one.

[53]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  Non-symbolic arithmetic in adults and young children , 2006, Cognition.