Quantification and persistence of COVID-19 virus in recently deceased individuals before and after embalming.

The COVID-19 pandemic severely affected the medical education worldwide. The infection risk for medical students and healthcare personnel who work with COVID-19 positive cadavers or tissues remains unclear. Moreover, COVID-19 positive cadavers have been rejected by medical schools, adversely impacting the continuum of medical education. Herein, the viral genome abundance in tissues from four COVID-19 positive donors before and after embalming were compared. Tissue samples were collected from the lungs, liver, spleen, and brain both pre- and postembalming. The possible presence of infectious COVID-19 was determined by inoculating human tissue homogenates onto a monolayer of human A549-hACE2 cells and observing for cytopathic effects up to 72 h postinoculation. A real- time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction was performed to quantify COVID-19 present in culture supernatants. Fully intact viral genome sequence was possible to obtain in samples with higher levels of virus, even several days postmortem. The embalming procedure described above substantially reduces the abundance of viable COVID-19 genomes in all tissues, sometimes even to undetectable levels. However, in some cases, COVID-19 RNA can still be detected, and a cytopathic effect can be seen both pre- and postembalmed tissues. This study suggests that embalmed COVID-19 positive cadavers might be used safely with appropriate precautions followed in gross anatomy laboratories and in clinical and scientific research. Deep lung tissue is the best specimen to test for the virus. If the tests on the lung tissues are negative, there is a very low likelihood that other tissues will show positive results.

[1]  S. Pittaluga,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 infection and persistence in the human body and brain at autopsy , 2022, Nature.

[2]  S. Ghosh Evolving strategies in whirlwind mode: The changing face of anatomy education during Covid‐19 pandemic , 2022, Anatomical sciences education.

[3]  P. Grossi,et al.  COVID-19 positive donor for solid organ transplantation , 2022, Journal of Hepatology.

[4]  W. Pawlina,et al.  The future of anatomy education: Learning from Covid‐19 disruption , 2022, Anatomical sciences education.

[5]  M. Vaccarezza,et al.  One year of anatomy teaching and learning in the outbreak: Has the Covid‐19 pandemic marked the end of a century‐old practice? A systematic review , 2021, Anatomical sciences education.

[6]  Y. Kawaoka,et al.  Enhanced fusogenicity and pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 Delta P681R mutation , 2021, Nature.

[7]  K. Jahangiri,et al.  Factors affecting management of corpses of the confirmed COVID-19 patients during pandemic: A systematic review , 2021, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine.

[8]  F. Quondamatteo,et al.  Neutralisation of SARS‐CoV‐2 by anatomical embalming solutions , 2021, Journal of anatomy.

[9]  Jessie S. Barrot,et al.  Students’ online learning challenges during the pandemic and how they cope with them: The case of the Philippines , 2021, Education and Information Technologies.

[10]  Kimberly S. Latacha,et al.  The state of anatomical donation programs amidst the SARS‐CoV‐2 (Covid‐19) pandemic , 2021, Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y. Print).

[11]  G. Musuka,et al.  Risk factors for COVID-19 among healthcare workers. A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2021, PloS one.

[12]  M. Manzanares-Céspedes,et al.  Body Donation, Teaching, and Research in Dissection Rooms in Spain in Times of Covid‐19 , 2021, Anatomical sciences education.

[13]  A. Berger,et al.  Infectivity of deceased COVID-19 patients , 2021, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[14]  S. S. S. N. Rajasekhar,et al.  The Cadaver Conundrum: Sourcing and Anatomical Embalming of Human Dead Bodies by Medical Schools during and after COVID-19 Pandemic: Review and Recommendations , 2021, SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.

[15]  O. Onigbinde COVID-19 pandemic era: How risky is the continuous usage of cadavers for teaching and research? , 2021, Morphologie.

[16]  I. Iavicoli,et al.  Analysis of the persistence time of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in the cadaver and the risk of passing infection to autopsy staff , 2021, The Medico-legal journal.

[17]  T. Chia,et al.  Covid‐19: Emerging Considerations for Body Sourcing and Handling. A Perspective View from Nigeria , 2020, Anatomical sciences education.

[18]  W. Pawlina,et al.  A Journey Like No Other: Anatomy 2020! , 2020, Anatomical sciences education.

[19]  M. Elhadi,et al.  Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical education: Medical students’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding electronic learning , 2020, PloS one.

[20]  N. Rodić,et al.  Positive Postmortem Test for SARS-CoV-2 Following Embalming in Confirmed COVID-19 Autopsy , 2020, American journal of clinical pathology.

[21]  A. Ajagbe,et al.  Post-COVID-19 pandemic: Standard operating procedures for gross anatomy laboratory in the new standard , 2020, Morphologie.

[22]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Effective use of the McNemar test , 2020, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[23]  R. Khalil,et al.  The sudden transition to synchronized online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic in Saudi Arabia: a qualitative study exploring medical students’ perspectives , 2020, BMC medical education.

[24]  Patricia Harrington,et al.  SARS-CoV-2 detection, viral load and infectivity over the course of an infection , 2020, Journal of Infection.

[25]  S. Dhawan Online Learning: A Panacea in the Time of COVID-19 Crisis , 2020, Journal of Educational Technology Systems.

[26]  P. Chaudhary,et al.  Cadaverless anatomy: Darkness in the times of pandemic Covid-19 , 2020, Morphologie.

[27]  D. Raoult,et al.  Viral RNA load as determined by cell culture as a management tool for discharge of SARS-CoV-2 patients from infectious disease wards , 2020, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases.

[28]  K. Ravi Dead Body Management in Times of Covid‐19 and its Potential Impact on the Availability of Cadavers for Medical Education in India , 2020, Anatomical sciences education.

[29]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Going Virtual to Support Anatomy Education: A STOPGAP in the Midst of the Covid‐19 Pandemic , 2020, Anatomical sciences education.

[30]  G. Kampf,et al.  Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents , 2020, Journal of Hospital Infection.

[31]  S. Ooi,et al.  Impact of SARS-CoV-2 virus pandemic on the future of cadaveric dissection anatomical teaching , 2020, Medical Education Online.

[32]  J. Cryan,et al.  A comparison of embalming fluids on the structures and properties of tissue in human cadavers , 2018, Anatomia, histologia, embryologia.

[33]  Sonja Zehetmayer,et al.  An omnibus test for the global null hypothesis , 2017, Statistical methods in medical research.

[34]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Virus characterization and discovery in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues , 2015, Journal of Virological Methods.

[35]  Erich Brenner,et al.  Human body preservation – old and new techniques , 2014, Journal of anatomy.

[36]  Ş. Ustaçelebi,et al.  Infective agents in fixed human cadavers: A brief review and suggested guidelines , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[37]  A. Rigby Statistical methods in epidemiology. VII. An overview of the χ 2 test for 2×2 contingency table analysis. , 2001, Disability and rehabilitation.

[38]  Wenlei Jiang,et al.  Formaldehyde-mediated aggregation of protein antigens: comparison of untreated and formalinized model antigens. , 2000, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[39]  M. Monden,et al.  Analysis of chemical modification of RNA from formalin-fixed samples and optimization of molecular biology applications for such samples. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[40]  D. Altman,et al.  Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. , 1995, BMJ.

[41]  B. Haldane THE ESTIMATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE LOGARITHM OF A RATIO OF FREQUENCIES , 1956, Annals of human genetics.