L1 INFLUENCE ON THE ACQUISITION ORDER OF ENGLISH GRAMMATICAL MORPHEMES

We revisit morpheme studies to evaluate the long-standing claim for a universal order of acquisition. We investigate the L2 acquisition order of six English grammatical morphemes by learners from seven L1 groups across five proficiency levels. Data are drawn from approximately 10,000 written exam scripts from the Cambridge Learner Corpus. The study establishes clear L1 influence on the absolute accuracy of morphemes and their acquisition order, therefore challenging the widely held view that there is a universal order of acquisition of L2 morphemes. Moreover, we find that L1 influence is morpheme specific, with morphemes encoding language-specific concepts most vulnerable to L1 influence.

[1]  E. Ziegel,et al.  Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference , 1993 .

[2]  R. Dekeyser,et al.  Explaining the “Natural Order of L2 Morpheme Acquisition” in English: A Meta-analysis of Multiple Determinants , 2001 .

[3]  Keumsil Kim Yoon.  CHALLENGING PROTOTYPE DESCRIPTIONS: PERCEPTION OF NOUN COUNTABILITY AND INDEFINITE VS. ZERO ARTICLE USE , 1993 .

[4]  Jenifer Larson-Hall,et al.  Improving Data Analysis in Second Language Acquisition by Utilizing Modern Developments in Applied Statistics , 2010 .

[5]  Michael J. Crawley,et al.  The R book , 2022 .

[6]  Helen Yannakoudakis,et al.  A New Dataset and Method for Automatically Grading ESOL Texts , 2011, ACL.

[7]  Stuart D. Shaw,et al.  Examining Writing: Research and Practice in Assessing Second Language Writing , 2007 .

[8]  N. Ellis.  Selective Attention and Transfer Phenomena in L2 Acquisition: Contingency, Cue Competition, Salience, Interference, Overshadowing, Blocking, and Perceptual Learning , 2006 .

[9]  Philip M. McCarthy,et al.  MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[10]  D Nicholls,et al.  The Cambridge Learner Corpus-Error coding and analysis , 1999 .

[11]  R. Dekeyser.  WHAT MAKES LEARNING SECOND-LANGUAGE GRAMMAR DIFFICULT? AREVIEW OF ISSUES , 2005 .

[12]  Michael Milanovic,et al.  Continuity and innovation : revising the Cambridge Proficiency in English Examination, 1913-2002 , 2003 .

[13]  G. Cinque.  A Note on Mood, Modality, Tense and Aspect Affixes in Turkish , 2002 .

[14]  Donna Lardiere,et al.  Ultimate Attainment in Second Language Acquisition: A Case Study , 2006 .

[15]  Jesse Egbert,et al.  Bootstrapping in Applied Linguistics: Assessing its Potential Using Shared Data , 2014 .

[16]  Folkert Kuiken,et al.  The influence of complexity in monologic versus dialogic tasks in Dutch L2 , 2007 .

[17]  Myong-Hee Choi,et al.  Testing Eubank's Optional Verb-Raising in L2 Grammars of Korean Speakers , 2005 .

[18]  Scott Jarvis,et al.  Detecting L2 Writers’ L1s on the Basis of their Lexical Styles , 2012 .

[19]  R. Andersen.  AN IMPLICATIONAL MODEL FOR SECOND LANGUAGE RESEARCH , 1978 .

[20]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  NATURAL SEQUENCES IN CHILD SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION1 , 1974 .

[21]  Neal Snape.  Resetting the Nominal Mapping Parameter in L2 English: Definite article use and the count–mass distinction* , 2008, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[22]  Yuko Goto Butler,et al.  SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS' THEORIES ON THE USE OF ENGLISH ARTICLES , 2002, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[23]  Tania Ionin,et al.  The Role of L1 Transfer in the Interpretation of Articles with Definite Plurals in L2 English , 2010 .

[24]  Ted Briscoe,et al.  The Second Release of the RASP System , 2006, ACL.

[25]  Marina K. Burt,et al.  SHOULD WE TEACH CHILDREN SYNTAX , 1973 .

[26]  Andreas Digeser,et al.  Understanding second language acquisition , 1988, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[27]  C. Perdue,et al.  IN FIRST AND SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2004 .

[28]  K. Hakuta.  A CASE STUDY OF A JAPANESE CHILD LEARNING ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE1,2 , 1976 .

[29]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  Is the Acquisition Order of Grammatical Morphemes Impervious to L1 Knowledge? Evidence From the Acquisition of Plural ‐s, Articles, and Possessive ’s , 2009 .

[30]  P. A. Villiers,et al.  A cross-sectional study of the acquisition of grammatical morphemes in child speech , 1973, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[31]  Scott Jarvis,et al.  Methodological Rigor in the Study of Transfer: Identifying L1 Influence in them Interlanguage Lexicon , 2000 .

[32]  Paula Buttery,et al.  Criterial Features in Learner Corpora: Theory and Illustrations , 2010 .

[33]  D. Larsen-Freeman.  AN EXPLANATION FOR THE MORPHEME ACQUISITION ORDER OF SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNERS , 1976 .

[34]  Artemis Alexiadou,et al.  Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase , 1998 .

[35]  Teresa Pica,et al.  ADULT ACQUISITION OF ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS OF EXPOSURE , 1983 .

[36]  Juana M. Liceras,et al.  Functional Categories and Acquisition Orders , 1994 .

[37]  Roumyana Slabakova,et al.  The bottleneck of second language acquisition , 2014 .

[38]  Ianthi Maria Tsimpli,et al.  The Interpretability Hypothesis: evidence from wh-interrogatives in second language acquisition , 2007 .

[39]  Yo In'nami,et al.  Effects of Text Length on Lexical Diversity Measures: Using Short Texts with Less than 200 Tokens. , 2012 .

[40]  Nina Vyatkina.  Approaching Language Transfer Through Text Classification: Explorations in the Detection-Based Approach. , 2014 .

[41]  Xiaofei Lu,et al.  Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing , 2010 .

[42]  E. Jelinek.  Empty categories, case, and configurationality , 1984 .

[43]  Thomas Lindauer.  Attributive Genitive Constructions in German , 1998 .

[44]  D. Freeman,et al.  The Acquisition of Grammatical Morphemes by Adult ESL Students. , 1975 .

[45]  Roger W. Brown,et al.  A First Language: The Early Stages , 1974 .

[46]  Yasuhiro Shirai,et al.  Where the Progressive and the Resultative Meet , 1998 .

[47]  D. Slobin.  From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking” , 1996 .

[48]  Roger Hawkins,et al.  Towards an account of the possessive constructions: NP's N and the N of NP1 , 1981, Journal of Linguistics.

[49]  M. Durrell.  Hammer’s German Grammar and Usage , 1991 .

[50]  Y. Shirai.  The emergence of tense-aspect morphology in Japanese: universal predisposition? , 1998 .

[51]  Teresa Pica,et al.  Methods of Morpheme Quantification: Their Effect on the Interpretation of Second Language Data , 1983, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[52]  Nuria Sagarra,et al.  THE BOUNDS OF ADULT LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2010, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[53]  G. Müller.  A Distributed Morphology Approach to Syncretism in Russian Noun Inflection � , 2004 .

[54]  P. Robinson.  Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: exploring interactions in a componential framework , 2001 .

[55]  Johanne Paradis,et al.  Articles in child L2 English: When L1 and L2 acquisition meet at the interface , 2012 .

[56]  Seán Devitt,et al.  Language Processing and Second Language Development: Processability Theory , 2000 .

[57]  Terence Odlin,et al.  Language Transfer: Contents , 1989 .

[58]  Jürgen M. Meisel.  First and Second Language Acquisition: Index , 2011 .

[59]  Tania Ionin,et al.  This is Definitely Specific: Specificity and Definiteness in Article Systems , 2006 .

[60]  Eun-Hee Lee,et al.  Dynamic and Stative Information in Temporal Reasoning: Interpretation of Korean Past Markers in Narrative Discourse , 2007 .

[61]  Carolyn G. Madden,et al.  IS THERE A “NATURAL SEQUENCE” IN ADULT SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNING? , 1974 .

[62]  Roger Hawkey.  Examining FCE and CAE: Key Issues and Recurring Themes in Developing the First Certificate in English and Certificate in Advanced English Exams , 2009 .