Cracking the cluster: The acquisition of verb raising in Dutch

In this paper, we argue that ascending verb cluster orders (1-2 and 1-2-3, e.g. moet eten ‘must eat’ and moet hebben gegeten ‘must have eaten’) are not only the default verb cluster orders in Standard Dutch as spoken in the Netherlands, but also play a crucial role in the acquisition of verb clusters. We administered a series of three sentence repetition tasks (SRTs) to a total of 120 children (2;8–5;6), and found that children, in contrast to what previous literature might predict, are much more likely to produce 1-2 orders than 2-1 orders. We propose an acquisition pathway in which we assume an OV stage (Vfin-final) and a 1-2 stage before children completely fine-tune their preferences toward adult-like behavior. We further argue that this pathway first applies to bipartite modal-infinitive clusters but is quickly expanded to include all cluster types. We believe our proposal has three advantages: it answers an important learnability question, explains the differences attested between the way children of different ages handle verb clusters, and strongly suggests that verb clusters follow one general rule, rather than several separate construction-specific ones.

[1]  S. Crain,et al.  Structure dependence in grammar formation , 1987 .

[2]  S. Barbiers,et al.  Word order variation in three-verb clusters and the division of labour between generative linguistics and sociolinguistics , 2005 .

[3]  Sjef Barbiers,et al.  Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten Deel II / Syntactic Atlas of the Dutch Dialects Volume II , 2008 .

[4]  B. Lust,et al.  Continuity and development in the acquisition of inversion in yes/no questions: dissociating movement and inflection , 2002, Journal of Child Language.

[5]  Mona Arfs Rood of Groen? De interne woordvolgorde in tweeeledige werkwoordelijke eindgroepen met een voltooid deelwoord en een hulpwerkwoord in bijzinnen in het hedendaags Nederlands , 2007 .

[6]  C.J.W. Zwart,et al.  Verb Clusters in Continental West Germanic Dialects , 1996 .

[7]  S. Barbiers,et al.  Werkwoordclusters en de grammatica van de rechterperiferie , 2008 .

[8]  A. Evers The transformational cycle in Dutch and German , 1975 .

[9]  Evie Coussé,et al.  Motivaties voor volgordevariatie : een diachrone studie van werkwoordvolgorde in het Nederlands , 2008 .

[10]  Susi Wurmbrand,et al.  Verb Clusters, Verb Raising, and Restructuring , 2007 .

[11]  Olaf Koeneman,et al.  Veranderingen in Friese werkwoordclusters , 2006 .

[12]  Jacqueline van Kampen,et al.  Typological guidance in the acquisition of V2 Dutch , 2010 .

[13]  R. Thornton,et al.  Negation in children's questions: the case of English , 1995 .

[14]  Gert De Sutter,et al.  Rood, groen, corpus! Een taalgebruiksgebaseerde analyse van woordvolgordevariatie in tweeledige werkwoordelijke eindgroepen , 2005 .

[15]  J. Saegert,et al.  Elicited Imitation in Second Language Learners , 1977, Language and speech.

[16]  Dirk Geeraerts,et al.  Regionale en stilistische effecten op de woordvolgorde in werkwoordelijke eindgroepen , 2005 .

[17]  Eric Hoekstra,et al.  Three-Verb Clusters in Interference Frisian: A Stochastic Model over Sequential Syntactic Input , 2016, Language and speech.

[18]  Shalom Zuckerman,et al.  The acquisition of "optional" movement , 2001 .

[19]  Norbert Corver,et al.  Syntax of Dutch , 2015 .

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  A A Montgomery,et al.  Sentence repetition in preschoolers: Effects of length, complexity, and word familiarity , 1978, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[22]  Evie Coussé,et al.  Variabele werkwoordsvolgorde in de Nederlandse werkwoordelijke eindgroep: een taalgebruiksgebaseerd perspectief op de synchronie en diachronie van de zgn. rode en groene woordvolgorde , 2008 .

[23]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[24]  J.P.A. Stroop,et al.  Twee- en meerledige werkwoordsgroepen in gesproken Nederlands , 2009 .