Vehicle automation: A remedy for driver stress?

The present study addressed the effects of stress, vehicle automation and subjective state on driver performance and mood in a simulated driving task. A total of 168 college students participated. Participants in the stress-induction condition completed a ‘winter’ drive, which included periodic loss of control episodes. Participants in the no-stress-induction condition were not exposed to loss of control. An additional, independent manipulation of vehicle speed was also conducted, consisting of two control conditions requiring manual speed regulation and a third in which vehicle speed was automatically regulated by the simulation. Stress and automation both influenced subjective distress, but the two factors did not interact. Driver performance data indicated that vehicle automation impacted performance similarly in the stress and no-stress conditions. Individual differences in subjective stress response and performance were also investigated. Resource theory provides a framework that partially but not completely explains the relationship between vehicle automation and driver stress. Implications for driver workload, safety and training are discussed.

[1]  G. Matthews,et al.  Worry and Information‐Processing , 2008 .

[2]  Abuse.  Humans and Automation : Use , Misuse , Disuse , , 2008 .

[3]  C. Spence,et al.  The differential effect of vibrotactile and auditory cues on visual spatial attention , 2006, Ergonomics.

[4]  John D. Lee,et al.  Human Factors and Ergonomics in Automation Design , 2006 .

[5]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  The ironies of vehicle feedback in car design , 2006, Ergonomics.

[6]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone , 2005 .

[7]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control , 2005, Ergonomics.

[8]  Mark J.M. Sullman.  The Application of Accident Script Analysis to Truck Crashes , 2005 .

[9]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload , 2004, Ergonomics.

[10]  John D. Lee,et al.  Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance , 2004, Hum. Factors.

[11]  David B. Kaber,et al.  The effects of level of automation and adaptive automation on human performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task , 2004 .

[12]  Francesc Marcé i Puig.  Designing the stress , 2004 .

[13]  Rebecca A. Grier,et al.  Fundamental dimensions of subjective state in performance settings: task engagement, distress, and worry. , 2002, Emotion.

[14]  G. Matthews,et al.  Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  G. Matthews.  Towards a transactional ergonomics for driver stress and fatigue , 2002 .

[16]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Attention and automation: New perspectives on mental underload and performance , 2002 .

[17]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  AUTOMATING THE DRIVER'S CONTROL TASKS , 2001 .

[18]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Where Is Computing Driving Cars? , 2001, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  G. Matthews.  A TRANSACTIONAL MODEL OF DRIVER STRESS , 2001 .

[20]  Özgür Simsek,et al.  SECONDARY-TASK MEASURES OF DRIVER WORKLOAD , 2001 .

[21]  G. Matthews.  Human Performance: Cognition, Stress and Individual Differences , 2000 .

[22]  Constance S. Royden,et al.  From vision to action: experiments and models of steering control during driving. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part A.

[24]  Lisa Dorn,et al.  Driver Stress and Performance on a Driving Simulator , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[25]  G. Matthews,et al.  Arousal and vigilance: The role of task demands. , 1998 .

[26]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[27]  H. Gr.  Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload; a cognitive-energetical framework. , 1997 .

[28]  G. R. J. Hockey.  Compensatory control in the regulation of human performance under stress and high workload: A cognitive-energetical framework , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[29]  G. Matthews,et al.  A COMPREHENSIVE QUESTIONNAIRE MEASURE OF DRIVER STRESS AND AFFECT , 1997 .

[30]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  Individual Differences in Driver Stress and Performance , 1996 .

[31]  Angus S. McDonald,et al.  Psychiatric disorders and accidental injury , 1996 .

[32]  Roger E. Kirk,et al.  Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). , 1995 .

[33]  Rapid Thermal Multiprocessor,et al.  Supervisory Control of a , 1993 .

[34]  N Moray,et al.  Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. , 1992, Ergonomics.

[35]  S. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data , 1991 .

[36]  G. Matthews,et al.  Personality correlates of driver stress , 1991 .

[37]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  The stress of driving: A diary study , 1990 .

[38]  P. Hancock,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Stress and Sustained Attention , 1989, Human factors.

[39]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[40]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[41]  S. Folkman,et al.  Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York, NY: Springer; , 1984 .

[42]  A T Welford,et al.  Mental work-load as a function of demand, capacity, strategy and skill. , 1978, Ergonomics.

[43]  Daniel G Bobrow,et al.  On data-limited and resource-limited processes , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1974 .

[45]  R. Kirk.  Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences , 1970 .

[46]  William G. Cochran,et al.  Experimental Designs, 2nd Edition , 1950 .