Effect of Microtopography, Slope Length and Gradient, and Vegetative Cover on Overland Flow Through Simulation

Overland flow on a hillslope is significantly influenced by its microtopography, slope length and gradient, and vegetative cover. A 1D kinematic wave model in conjunction with a revised form of the Green-Ampt infiltration equation was employed to evaluate the effect of these surface conditions. The effect of these conditions was treated through the resistance parameter in the kinematic wave model. The resistance in this paper was considered to be made up of grain resistance, form resistance, and wave resistance. It was found that irregular slopes with microtopography eroded more easily than did regular slopes. The effect of the slope gradient on flow velocity and flow shear stress could be negative or positive. With increasing slope gradient, the flow velocity and shear stress first increased to a peak value, then decreased again, suggesting that there exists a critical slope gradient for flow velocity and shear stress. The vegetative cover was found to protect soil from erosion primarily by enhancing erosion-resisting capacity rather than by decreasing the eroding capability of overland flow.

[1]  D. Storm,et al.  Applicability of St. Venant Equations for Two‐Dimensional Overland Flows over Rough Infiltrating Surfaces , 1993 .

[2]  Mark M. Meerschaert,et al.  Mathematical Modeling , 2014, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining.

[3]  H. A. Einstein,et al.  Fluid resistance of composite roughness , 1950 .

[4]  Gokmen Tayfur,et al.  Modeling Two-Dimensional Erosion Process over Infiltrating Surfaces , 2001 .

[5]  RUNOFF GENERATION CHARACTERISTICS IN TYPICAL EROSION REGIONS ON THE LOESS PLATEAU , 2001 .

[6]  Gokmen Tayfur,et al.  Areally-averagei overland flow equations at hillslope scale , 1998 .

[7]  Claudio O. Stöckle,et al.  Modelling overland flow based on Saint‐Venant equations for a discretized hillslope system , 2002 .

[8]  V. Singh,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Watershed Hydrology , 2002 .

[9]  D. S. L. Lawrence,et al.  Hydraulic resistance in overland flow during partial and marginal surface inundation: Experimental observations and modeling , 2000 .

[10]  A. Parsons,et al.  Field And Laboratory Studies Of Resistance To Interrill Overland Flow On Semi-Arid Hillslopes, Southern Arizona , 1992 .

[11]  Christian Valentin,et al.  A runoff capability classification system based on surface features criteria in semi-arid areas of West Africa , 1992 .

[12]  W. Wallender,et al.  Runoff from orchard floors—micro-plot field experiments and modeling , 2002 .

[13]  H Rajaie,et al.  Runoff hydrograph simulation based on time variable isochrone technique , 2002 .

[14]  R. Prasad,et al.  Runoff processes in headwater catchments—an experimental study in Western Ghats, South India , 2000 .

[15]  Rao S. Govindaraju,et al.  A simplified model for two-dimensional overland flows , 1992 .

[16]  David A. Woolhiser,et al.  Unsteady, one‐dimensional flow over a plane—The rising hydrograph , 1967 .

[17]  Curtis L. Larson,et al.  Modeling infiltration during a steady rain , 1973 .

[18]  Ruh-Ming Li,et al.  RAINFALL EFFECT ON SHEET FLOW OVER SMOOTH SURFACE , 1973 .

[19]  A. Parsons,et al.  Resistance to overland flow on desert hillslopes , 1986 .

[20]  V. T. Chow.  Open-channel hydraulics , 1959 .

[21]  J. Lima.  Overland flow under rainfall : some aspects related to modelling and conditioning factors , 1989 .

[22]  陈力,et al.  INFLUENCES OF SLOPE GRADIENT ON SOIL EROSION , 2001 .

[23]  V. Singh,et al.  Kinematic Wave Modeling in Water Resources: Surface-Water Hydrology , 1996 .