Guidelines for the design of a mobile phone application for deaf people

Deaf people in South Africa are no longer a minority group and their needs regarding communication and interaction must therefore be taken into consideration. This demographic does not communicate and interact in the same way as hearing people, which means that any existing usability or accessibility guidelines do not apply. As a result, Deaf people do not have access to information in the same way that a hearing person does. Providing proper access to Information and Communications Technology services, which meet their particular needs, will help the hearing impaired to better integrate into society. The importance of demolishing the communication barrier between the hearing and the hearing impaired is very important. Many people assume that sign language is somehow based on oral language. However, this is not the case. Sign languages are natural visual-spatial languages, and form a contrast with spoken languages which are auditory-vocal based. Acknowledging this fact in 2008, the South African Sign Language Policy Implementation Conference together with several governmental bodies suggested that South African Sign Language should become recognized as the 12 official language of South Africa. Due to the fact that cell phone technology continues to evolve, it will remain a tool of communication upon which Deaf people heavily rely on. The cell phone fulfils a basic need for everyone, but especially for the Deaf demographic as they rely on the short message system to communicate. Deaf people are currently faced with a lack of appropriate mobile phone applications, which would allow them to communicate with hearing as well as deaf people. The primary objective of this research was therefore to make mobile technology equally accessible meaning usable to members of the Deaf demographic. The focus of the research was to investigate the communication barrier and a range of variables that can influence the deaf user’s experience. Topics such as user interface design, usability and interaction were investigated. The outcome of this research was to propose a set of guidelines that, when applied to the design of a website or to phone application accessibility, would ensure communication and interaction from a deaf user. The proposed set of guidelines was then applied to the design of the high fidelity prototype of a mobile phone application. The specific application is a messaging phone application that allows deaf users to communicate with other deaf and hearing users via short message system. A mobile phone application that allows Deaf people to send and receive messages based on the sign language alphabet. The application was named Signchat. Purpose of this was to visibly display how the guidelines were implemented in Signchat. While Signchat’s main purpose is to accommodate the needs of Deaf people, it is also a learning tool and an application that bridges the gap by allowing deaf and hearing users to communicate.

[1]  Bengt Sandblad,et al.  Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) , 2013 .

[2]  Debra Aarons South African Sign Language: Changing policies. , 2013 .

[3]  Timothy Reagan,et al.  South African Sign Language and language-in-education policy in South Africa , 2012 .

[4]  S. Moodley,et al.  ECD policies in South Africa What about children with disabilities , 2011 .

[5]  A. Finlay,et al.  Global Information Society Watch 2011 : internet rights and democratisation; focus on freedom of expression and association online , 2011 .

[6]  D. Swanepoel,et al.  Early hearing detection and intervention in South Africa. , 2009, International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology.

[7]  Barbara Arfé,et al.  Hyperlink format, categorization abilities and memory span as contributors to deaf users hypertext access. , 2008, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[8]  Ornella Mich,et al.  Constraint-based Temporal Reasoning and E-Learning Tools for Deaf Users. A Literature Review , 2008 .

[9]  Sri Hastuti Kurniawan,et al.  A method and advisor tool for multimedia user interface design , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[10]  Marilyn Lichtman,et al.  Qualitative Research in Education: A User's Guide , 2006 .

[11]  Brian Kelly,et al.  Implementing a Holistic Approach to E-Learning Accessibility , 2005 .

[12]  L. Azbel,et al.  How do the deaf read ? The paradox of performing a phonemic task without sound , 2004 .

[13]  R. Abusabha,et al.  Qualitative vs quantitative methods: two opposites that make a perfect match. , 2003, Journal of the American Dietetic Association.

[14]  Philip E. T. Lewis,et al.  Research Methods for Business Students Instructors Manual (3rd edition) , 2003 .

[15]  T. Egan Grounded Theory Research and Theory Building , 2002 .

[16]  C. Brookes Speech-to-text systems for deaf, deafened and hard-of-hearing people , 2000 .

[17]  K. Hambridge Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[18]  S. Lester An introduction to phenomenological research , 1999 .

[19]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Survey Research Methodology in Management Information Systems: An Assessment , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Tom Carey,et al.  ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction , 1992 .

[21]  M. Easterby-Smith,et al.  Management Research: An Introduction , 1991 .

[22]  Earl R. Babbie,et al.  The practice of social research , 1969 .