The social processes of production and validation of knowledge in particle physics: Preliminary theoretical and methodological observations

Abstract This paper explores the complementarities and differences between Bourdieu's Field Theory and Social Network Analysis from both a theoretical and methodological perspective. The argument is applied to a case study about the social production and validation of knowledge in particle physics in Italy. The methodological choices that have lead the research project are presented and justified, and provide a good example about the strengths and the weaknesses of the two theoretical perspectives combined. While the Field Theory approach allows mapping the combination and distribution of symbolic capital within a social structure of objective relationships, SNA is useful to analyze the concrete set of interactions within physicists, in which the dynamics of power, alliances, conflicts and exchange take place. Data have been collected using a mixed method strategy, which entails desk research, on line questionnaires and qualitative interviews. Some potential strategies for analyzing the data are presented in the discussion section.

[1]  Karin D. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  The Couch, the Cathedral, and the Laboratory : On the Relationship between Experiment and Laboratory in Science , 1992 .

[2]  M. Tomassini,et al.  Empirical analysis of the evolution of a scientific collaboration network , 2007 .

[3]  Norman P. Hummon,et al.  Connectivity in a citation network: The development of DNA theory☆ , 1989 .

[4]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[5]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[6]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice by H. M. Collins (review) , 1988, Technology and Culture.

[7]  Martin Hollis,et al.  Rationality and Relativism , 1983 .

[8]  David Krackhardt,et al.  Cognitive social structures , 1987 .

[9]  B. Barnes,et al.  Relativism, rationalism and the sociology of knowledge , 1982 .

[10]  Jeffrey C. Johnson.  Selecting ethnographic informants , 1992 .

[11]  A. Spicer,et al.  Is Actor Network Theory Critique? , 2008 .

[12]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign. , 1955 .

[13]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign , 1968 .

[14]  Daren Yu,et al.  Effect of the age of papers on the preferential attachment in citation networks , 2009 .

[15]  D. Krackhardt.  Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. , 1990 .

[16]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign , 1954 .

[17]  P. Lazarsfeld,et al.  6. Katz, E. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications , 1956 .

[18]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the absorptive capacity field , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[19]  C. Martin,et al.  SA science and technology indicators , 1994 .

[20]  Sofía Liberman,et al.  The flow of knowledge: Scientific contacts in formal meetings , 1997 .

[21]  John Scott.  What is social network analysis , 2010 .

[22]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[23]  A. Bruni,et al.  Reassembling the Social—An Introduction to Actor Network Theory , 2007 .

[24]  A. Michaelson.  The development of a scientific specialty as diffusion through social relations: the case of role analysis , 1993 .

[25]  M. Mulkay,et al.  Opening Pandora's Box: A Sociological Analysis of Scientists' Discourse , 1984 .

[26]  A. Pickering.  Science as practice and culture , 1992 .

[27]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Science of Science and Reflexivity , 2004 .

[28]  P. Bourdieu.  Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste* , 2018, Food and Culture.

[29]  Stanley Wasserman,et al.  Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications , 1994, Structural analysis in the social sciences.

[30]  Jenine K. Harris,et al.  Forty years of secondhand smoke research: the gap between discovery and delivery. , 2009, American journal of preventive medicine.

[31]  S. Liberman,et al.  Bonding number in scientific disciplines , 1998 .

[32]  Leah A. Lievrouw,et al.  Triangulation as a research strategy for identifying invisible colleges among biomedical scientists , 1987 .

[33]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Social networks as normal science , 1993 .

[34]  Geoffrey Johnson.  The Small World , 1953 .

[35]  D. Price.  Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .

[36]  Elliot Noma.  Untangling citation networks , 1982, Inf. Process. Manag..

[37]  H. Russell Bernard,et al.  Estimating the size of an average personal network and of an event subpopulation: Some empirical results☆ , 1991 .

[38]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[39]  Georg Simmel.  Soziologie: Untersuchungen Über Die Formen Der Vergesellschaftung , 2009 .

[40]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[41]  P. Bourdieu.  Forms of Capital , 2002 .

[42]  L. Guest.  The People's Choice: How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. , 1946 .

[43]  J. Richardson.  Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education , 1986 .

[44]  Renaud Lambiotte,et al.  Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[45]  P. Bourdieu,et al.  实践与反思 : 反思社会学导引 = An invitation to reflexive sociology , 1994 .