Parameter-shared variational auto-encoding adversarial network for desert seismic data denoising in Northwest China

Abstract One of the key and difficult points in seismic data processing is seismic data denoising. Under the influence of the acquisition environment, the collected seismic data usually have low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and low resolution. In desert region of western China, different from other regions, the random noise there has complex characteristics of non-Gaussian, non-stationary and non-linearity. Its main frequency is quite low and its spectral overlap with those of effective signals. Moreover, large amount of data and intelligent requirements make traditional denoising methods encounter difficulties. In addition, the existing deep learning denoising methods also reveal two problems: first, they can only effectively suppress simple seismic noise such as Gaussian noise. But for the case of desert noise, they usually mistakenly judge noise as effective signals and destroy signal characteristic structure. Second, what is more important, in supervised-based methods paired noisy and pure data are usually used as training set. However, there is no noise-free data in actual desert seismic data, which severely limits the processing performance of supervised-based networks. Thus, a new parameter-shared variational auto-encoding adversarial network (PS-VAAN) is proposed for desert seismic data denoising in this paper. This new method includes two encoders, two generators and two discriminators . It can realize domain conversion from noisy data domain to pure data domain. We construct relatively complete unpaired pure and noisy data training sets for training, and design reconstruction loss function and adversarial loss function to optimize network parameters. Moreover, cycle-consistency loss is introduced to make sure two domains mapping into the same space. Compared with the state-of-art denoising methods on synthetic and actual seismic records, the proposed method not only has superior denoising ability, but also has strong feature extraction and fitting ability to recover effective signals with almost no energy loss .

[1]  Kamel Baddari,et al.  Seismic noise attenuation by means of an anisotropic non-linear diffusion filter , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[2]  Yu Zhang,et al.  Antileakage Fourier transform for seismic data regularization , 2005 .

[3]  Felix J. Herrmann,et al.  Seismic denoising with nonuniformly sampled curvelets , 2006, Computing in Science & Engineering.

[4]  Mirko van der Baan,et al.  Random and coherent noise attenuation by empirical mode decomposition , 2009 .

[5]  Koji Inoue,et al.  Automatic Arrival Time Detection for Earthquakes Based on Stacked Denoising Autoencoder , 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[6]  Yatong Zhou,et al.  Empirical Low-Rank Approximation for Seismic Noise Attenuation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[7]  M. Sacchi,et al.  Simultaneous seismic data denoising and reconstruction via multichannel singular spectrum analysis , 2011 .

[8]  P. E. Harris,et al.  Improving the performance of f-x prediction filtering at low signal-to-noise ratios , 1997 .

[9]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[10]  Max Welling,et al.  Auto-Encoding Variational Bayes , 2013, ICLR.

[11]  David O. Johnson,et al.  Improved automatic English proficiency rating of unconstrained speech with multiple corpora , 2016, Int. J. Speech Technol..

[12]  Yang Li,et al.  Non-subsampled Contourlet Transform Based Seismic Signal De-noising , 2009, 2009 WRI World Congress on Computer Science and Information Engineering.

[13]  Dominique Zosso,et al.  Variational Mode Decomposition , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[14]  S. Mostafa Mousavi,et al.  Seismic Signal Denoising and Decomposition Using Deep Neural Networks , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[15]  Yangkang Chen,et al.  Damped multichannel singular spectrum analysis for 3D random noise attenuation , 2016 .

[16]  Meng Zhang,et al.  Separating ground-roll from land seismic record via convolutional neural network , 2018 .

[17]  Simone Paolo Ponzetto,et al.  BabelNet: The automatic construction, evaluation and application of a wide-coverage multilingual semantic network , 2012, Artif. Intell..

[18]  Yue Li,et al.  Adaptive steering kernel regression for prestack seismogram denoising , 2015 .

[19]  Ali Gholami,et al.  Seismic random noise attenuation via 3D block matching , 2017 .

[20]  Yoshua Bengio,et al.  Generative Adversarial Nets , 2014, NIPS.

[21]  Yue Li,et al.  Low-Frequency Noise Suppression Method Based on Improved DnCNN in Desert Seismic Data , 2019, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[22]  S. Cao,et al.  The second-generation wavelet transform and its application in denoising of seismic data , 2005 .

[23]  Mokhtar Mohammadi,et al.  Seismic Random Noise Attenuation Using Synchrosqueezed Wavelet Transform and Low-Rank Signal Matrix Approximation , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[24]  M. Elad,et al.  $rm K$-SVD: An Algorithm for Designing Overcomplete Dictionaries for Sparse Representation , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[25]  Chao Zhang,et al.  Desert seismic random noise reduction based on LDA effective signal detection , 2019, Acta Geophysica.

[26]  Demetrio Labate,et al.  Optimally Sparse Multidimensional Representation Using Shearlets , 2007, SIAM J. Math. Anal..

[27]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.