Differentiating Phenotypes of Coronavirus Disease-2019 Pneumonia by Electric Impedance Tomography

Introduction Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia has different phenotypes. Selecting the patient individualized and optimal respirator settings for the ventilated patient is a challenging process. Electric impedance tomography (EIT) is a real-time, radiation-free functional imaging technique that can aid clinicians in differentiating the “low” (L-) and “high” (H-) phenotypes of COVID-19 pneumonia described previously. Methods Two patients (“A” and “B”) underwent a stepwise positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) recruitment by 3 cmH2O of steps from PEEP 10 to 25 and back to 10 cmH2O during a pressure control ventilation of 15 cmH2O. Recruitment maneuvers were performed under continuous EIT recording on a daily basis until patients required controlled ventilation mode. Results Patients “A” and “B” had a 7- and 12-day long trial, respectively. At the daily baseline, patient “A” had significantly higher compliance: mean ± SD = 53 ± 7 vs. 38 ± 5 ml/cmH2O (p < 0.001) and a significantly higher physiological dead space according to the Bohr–Enghoff equation than patient “B”: mean ± SD = 52 ± 4 vs. 45 ± 6% (p = 0.018). Following recruitment maneuvers, patient “A” had a significantly higher cumulative collapse ratio detected by EIT than patient “B”: mean ± SD = 0.40 ± 0.08 vs. 0.29 ± 0.08 (p = 0.007). In patient “A,” there was a significant linear regression between the cumulative collapse ratios at the end of the recruitment maneuvers (R2 = 0.824, p = 0.005) by moving forward in days, while not for patient “B” (R2 = 0.329, p = 0.5). Conclusion Patient “B” was recognized as H-phenotype with high elastance, low compliance, higher recruitability, and low ventilation-to-perfusion ratio; meanwhile patient “A” was identified as the L-phenotype with low elastance, high compliance, and lower recruitability. Observation by EIT was not just able to differentiate the two phenotypes, but it also could follow the transition from L- to H-type within patient “A.” Clinical Trial Registration www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04360837.

[1]  C. Guitart,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Chest electrical impedance tomography examination, data analysis, terminology, clinical use and recommendations: consensus statement of the TRanslational EIT developmeNt stuDy group. , 2022, Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature.

[2]  K. Möller,et al.  Detection of Different COVID-19 Pneumonia Phenotypes with Estimated Alveolar Collapse and Overdistention by Bedside Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2021, IFAC-PapersOnLine.

[3]  T. Kotani,et al.  Roles of Electrical Impedance Tomography in Determining a Lung Protective Strategy for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in the Era of Coronavirus Disease 2019 , 2021, JMA journal.

[4]  P. Pelosi,et al.  Computed tomography assessment of PEEP-induced alveolar recruitment in patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia , 2021, Critical Care.

[5]  A. Adler,et al.  The use of electrical impedance tomography for individualized ventilation strategy in COVID-19: a case report , 2021, BMC Pulmonary Medicine.

[6]  C. Stephani,et al.  Anatomic lung recruitment in the early phase of severe COVID-19-pneumonia , 2021, Pulmonology.

[7]  Karan Singh,et al.  COVID-19-RELATED ARDS PHENOTYPES AND PROGRESSION BETWEEN THEM: A CASE REPORT , 2020, Chest.

[8]  L. Vetrugno,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography and Prone Position During Ventilation in COVID-19 Pneumonia: Case Reports and a Brief Literature Review , 2020, Seminars in cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[9]  M. Tobin,et al.  P-SILI is not justification for intubation of COVID-19 patients , 2020, Annals of Intensive Care.

[10]  Mariano M Volpacchio,et al.  COVID-19: a hypothesis regarding the ventilation-perfusion mismatch , 2020, Critical Care.

[11]  D. Gommers,et al.  Electrical Impedance Tomography for Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Titration in COVID-19–related Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome , 2020, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[12]  P. Asfar,et al.  Recruitability and effect of PEEP in SARS-Cov-2-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome , 2020, Annals of Intensive Care.

[13]  D. Chiumello,et al.  COVID-19 pneumonia: ARDS or not? , 2020, Critical Care.

[14]  L. Camporota,et al.  COVID-19 pneumonia: different respiratory treatments for different phenotypes? , 2020, Intensive Care Medicine.

[15]  M. Wysocki,et al.  Assessment of Bohr and Enghoff Dead Space Equations in Mechanically Ventilated Children , 2017, Respiratory Care.

[16]  Steffen Leonhardt,et al.  Chest electrical impedance tomography examination, data analysis, terminology, clinical use and recommendations: consensus statement of the TRanslational EIT developmeNt stuDy group , 2016, Thorax.

[17]  Arthur S Slutsky,et al.  Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome The Berlin Definition , 2012 .

[18]  Marcelo B. P. Amato,et al.  Bedside estimation of recruitable alveolar collapse and hyperdistension by electrical impedance tomography , 2009, Intensive Care Medicine.

[19]  Guillermo Bugedo,et al.  Lung recruitment in patients with the acute respiratory distress syndrome. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Harki Tanaka,et al.  Imbalances in regional lung ventilation: a validation study on electrical impedance tomography. , 2004, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[21]  D. C. Henckel,et al.  Case report. , 1995, Journal.