Development of a Wearable Sensor System for Dynamically Mapping the Behavior of an Energy Storing and Returning Prosthetic Foot

Abstract It has been recognized that that the design and prescription of Energy Storing and Returning prosthetic running feet are not well understood and that further information on their performance would be beneficial to increase this understanding. Dynamic analysis of an amputee wearing a prosthetic foot is typically performed using reflective markers and motion-capture systems. High-speed cameras and force plates are used to collect data of a few strides. This requires specialized and expensive equipment in an unrepresentative environment within a large area. Inertial Measurement Units are also capable of being used as wearable sensors but suffer from drift issues. This paper presents the development of a wearable sensing system that records the action of an Energy Storing and Returning prosthetic running foot (sagittal plane displacement and ground contact position) which could have research and/or clinical applications. This is achieved using five standalone pieces of apparatus including foot-mounted pressure sensors and a rotary vario-resistive displacement transducer. It is demonstrated, through the collection of profiles for both foot deflection and ground contact point over the duration of a stride, that the system can be attached to an amputee’s prosthesis and used in a non-laboratory environment. It was found from the system that the prosthetic ground contact point, for the amputee tested, progresses along the effective metatarsal portion of the prosthetic foot towards the distal end of the prosthesis over the duration of the stride. Further investigation of the effective stiffness changes of the foot due to the progression of the contact point is warranted.

[1]  Brian J. Hafner,et al.  Clinical Prescription and Use of Prosthetic Foot and Ankle Mechanisms: A Review of the Literature , 2005 .

[2]  Tao Liu,et al.  Development of a wearable sensor system for quantitative gait analysis , 2009 .

[3]  J G Buckley Biomechanical adaptations of transtibial amputee sprinting in athletes using dedicated prostheses. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[4]  Hugh M Herr,et al.  Running-specific prostheses limit ground-force during sprinting , 2010, Biology Letters.

[5]  J Perry,et al.  Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic elastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. , 1990, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[6]  Eduardo Palermo,et al.  Experimental evaluation of accuracy and repeatability of a novel body-to-sensor calibration procedure for inertial sensor-based gait analysis , 2014 .

[7]  M Hillery,et al.  The design and testing of a composite lower limb prosthesis , 2000, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.

[8]  Thompson Sarkodie-Gyan,et al.  Analysis of muscle activity during gait cycle using fuzzy rule-based reasoning , 2010 .

[9]  R. Cooper,et al.  Adaptive Sports Technology and Biomechanics: Prosthetics , 2014, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[10]  Mauro Serpelloni,et al.  Wireless Instrumented Crutches for Force and Movement Measurements for Gait Monitoring , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[11]  John R. Rebula,et al.  Measurement of foot placement and its variability with inertial sensors. , 2013, Gait & posture.

[12]  D. Childress,et al.  The Effective Foot Length Ratio: A Potential Tool for Characterization and Evaluation of Prosthetic Feet , 2004 .

[13]  Shihab Asfour,et al.  A New Methodology to Measure the Running Biomechanics of Amputees , 2009, Prosthetics and orthotics international.

[14]  Joan E Sanders,et al.  Transtibial energy-storage-and-return prosthetic devices: a review of energy concepts and a proposed nomenclature. , 2002, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[15]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle Foot Versus Standard SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[16]  John Michael,et al.  Energy Storing Feet : A Clinical Comparison by , 2009 .

[17]  Luciano Boquete,et al.  A portable wireless biometric multi-channel system , 2012 .

[18]  Zhiqing Cheng,et al.  Capturing Human Motion in Natural Environments , 2015 .

[19]  Ong Zhi Chao Analysis of Composite Prosthetic Energy-Storing- and- Returning (ESR) feet: A comparison between FEA and the experimental analysis , 2012 .

[20]  Markus Windolf,et al.  Systematic accuracy and precision analysis of video motion capturing systems--exemplified on the Vicon-460 system. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[21]  ScienceDirect PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation. , 2009 .

[22]  R. Marshall,et al.  Relationships between ground reaction force impulse and kinematics of sprint-running acceleration. , 2005, Journal of applied biomechanics.

[23]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  Performance enhancement of bi-lateral lower-limb amputees in the latter phases of running events: an initial investigation , 2013 .

[24]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  Modal analysis of composite prosthetic energy-storing-and-returning feet: an initial investigation , 2013 .

[25]  J. Lehmann,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/Lite Foot versus SACH foot. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Johanne L Mattie,et al.  Biomechanical characteristics, patient preference and activity level with different prosthetic feet: a randomized double blind trial with laboratory and community testing. , 2015, Journal of biomechanics.

[27]  Siamak Noroozi,et al.  How should we assess the mechanical properties of lower-limb prosthesis technology used in elite sport?: An initial investigation , 2013 .