COLLISIONS BETWEEN GRAVITY-DOMINATED BODIES. I. OUTCOME REGIMES AND SCALING LAWS

Collisions are the core agent of planet formation. In this work, we derive an analytic description of the dynamical outcome for any collision between gravity-dominated bodies. We conduct high-resolution simulations of collisions between planetesimals; the results are used to isolate the effects of different impact parameters on collision outcome. During growth from planetesimals to planets, collision outcomes span multiple regimes: cratering, merging, disruption, super-catastrophic disruption, and hit-and-run events. We derive equations (scaling laws) to demarcate the transition between collision regimes and to describe the size and velocity distributions of the post-collision bodies. The scaling laws are used to calculate maps of collision outcomes as a function of mass ratio, impact angle, and impact velocity, and we discuss the implications of the probability of each collision regime during planet formation. Collision outcomes are described in terms of the impact conditions and the catastrophic disruption criteria, Q*RD—the specific energy required to disperse half the total colliding mass. All planet formation and collisional evolution studies have assumed that catastrophic disruption follows pure energy scaling; however, we find that catastrophic disruption follows nearly pure momentum scaling. As a result, Q*RD is strongly dependent on the impact velocity and projectile-to-target mass ratio in addition to the total mass and impact angle. To account for the impact angle, we derive the interacting mass fraction of the projectile; the outcome of a collision is dependent on the kinetic energy of the interacting mass rather than the kinetic energy of the total mass. We also introduce a new material parameter, c*, that defines the catastrophic disruption criteria between equal-mass bodies in units of the specific gravitational binding energy. For a diverse range of planetesimal compositions and internal structures, c* has a value of 5 ± 2; whereas for strengthless planets, we find c* = 1.9 ± 0.3. We refer to the catastrophic disruption criteria for equal-mass bodies as the principal disruption curve, which is used as the reference value in the calculation of Q*RD for any collision scenario. The analytic collision model presented in this work will significantly improve the physics of collisions in numerical simulations of planet formation and collisional evolution.

[1]  Harold F. Levison,et al.  Recent Origin of the Solar System Dust Bands , 2003 .

[2]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  Growth and Evolution of Asteroids , 2009 .

[3]  Sarah T. Stewart,et al.  VELOCITY-DEPENDENT CATASTROPHIC DISRUPTION CRITERIA FOR PLANETESIMALS , 2009 .

[4]  V. Svetsov Cratering erosion of planetary embryos , 2011 .

[5]  Kevin R. Housen,et al.  Scale Effects in Strength-Dominated Collisions of Rocky Asteroids , 1999 .

[6]  Hidekazu Tanaka,et al.  PLANETARY CORE FORMATION WITH COLLISIONAL FRAGMENTATION AND ATMOSPHERE TO FORM GAS GIANT PLANETS , 2011, 1106.2047.

[7]  T. Matsui,et al.  Laboratory simulation of planetesimal collision , 1982 .

[8]  S. Kenyon,et al.  Variations on Debris Disks: Icy Planet Formation at 30-150 AU for 1-3 M☉ Main-Sequence Stars , 2008, 0807.1134.

[9]  S. Stewart,et al.  Full numerical simulations of catastrophic small body collisions , 2008, 0811.0175.

[10]  W. Kuhs Physics and Chemistry of Ice , 2007 .

[11]  K. Holsapple THE SCALING OF IMPACT PROCESSES IN PLANETARY SCIENCES , 1993 .

[12]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  Formation of Asteroid Families by Catastrophic Disruption: Simulations with Fragmentation and Gravitational Reaccumulation , 2003 .

[13]  W. Benz,et al.  The Origin of Mercury , 2007 .

[14]  D. Lin,et al.  TOWARD A DETERMINISTIC MODEL OF PLANETARY FORMATION. VI. DYNAMICAL INTERACTION AND COAGULATION OF MULTIPLE ROCKY EMBRYOS AND SUPER-EARTH SYSTEMS AROUND SOLAR-TYPE STARS , 2010, 1006.2584.

[15]  Willy Benz,et al.  Extrasolar planet population synthesis I: Method, formation tracks and mass-distance distribution , 2009, 0904.2524.

[16]  R. Canup,et al.  Simulations of a late lunar-forming impact , 2004 .

[17]  Akira Fujiwara,et al.  Destruction of basaltic bodies by high-velocity impact , 1977 .

[18]  S. Stewart,et al.  COLLISIONS BETWEEN GRAVITY-DOMINATED BODIES. II. THE DIVERSITY OF IMPACT OUTCOMES DURING THE END STAGE OF PLANET FORMATION , 2011, 1109.4588.

[19]  Scott J. Kenyon,et al.  RAPID FORMATION OF ICY SUPER-EARTHS AND THE CORES OF GAS GIANT PLANETS , 2008, 0811.4665.

[20]  Collisional processes in extrasolar planetesimal discs – dust clumps in Fomalhaut's debris disc , 2002, astro-ph/0204034.

[21]  Lars Hernquist,et al.  WATER/ICY SUPER-EARTHS: GIANT IMPACTS AND MAXIMUM WATER CONTENT , 2010, 1007.3212.

[22]  Kevin R. Housen,et al.  Ejecta from impact craters , 2011 .

[23]  Robert A. Marcus,et al.  THE FORMATION OF THE COLLISIONAL FAMILY AROUND THE DWARF PLANET HAUMEA , 2010, 1003.5822.

[24]  Robert Jedicke,et al.  The fossilized size distribution of the main asteroid belt , 2003 .

[25]  J. J. Wu,et al.  Coefficient of restitution and rotational motions of rockfall impacts , 2002 .

[26]  W. Benz Low Velocity Collisions and the Growth of Planetesimals , 2000 .

[27]  Jaymie M. Matthews,et al.  A SUPER-EARTH TRANSITING A NAKED-EYE STAR , 2011, 1104.5230.

[28]  R. Canup,et al.  A Giant Impact Origin of Pluto-Charon , 2005, Science.

[29]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  Fragment properties at the catastrophic disruption threshold: The effect of the parent body’s internal structure , 2009, 0911.3937.

[30]  R. Canup Lunar-forming collisions with pre-impact rotation , 2007 .

[31]  P. Tanga,et al.  Collisions and Gravitational Reaccumulation: Forming Asteroid Families and Satellites , 2001, Science.

[33]  K. Holsapple,et al.  Point source solutions and coupling parameters in cratering mechanics , 1987 .

[34]  H. Melosh,et al.  ASTEROIDS : SHATTERED BUT NOT DISPERSED , 1997 .

[35]  K. Holsapple,et al.  On the fragmentation of asteroids and planetary satellites , 1990 .

[36]  W. Benz,et al.  Extrasolar planet population synthesis. III. Formation of planets around stars of different masses , 2011, 1101.0513.

[37]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  Size-frequency distributions of fragments from SPH/N-body simulations of asteroid impacts: Comparison with observed asteroid families , 2007 .

[38]  A. Morbidelli A coherent and comprehensive model of the evolution of the outer Solar System , 2010, 1010.6221.

[39]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  Hit-and-run planetary collisions , 2006, Nature.

[40]  Z. Leinhardt,et al.  A fast method for finding bound systems in numerical simulations: Results from the formation of asteroid binaries , 2005 .

[41]  Planetesimals to protoplanets – II. Effect of debris on terrestrial planet formation , 2009, 0903.2354.

[42]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  Accretion Efficiency during Planetary Collisions , 2004 .

[43]  F. Fressin,et al.  CHARACTERISTICS OF PLANETARY CANDIDATES OBSERVED BY KEPLER. II. ANALYSIS OF THE FIRST FOUR MONTHS OF DATA , 2011, 1102.0541.

[44]  Lars Hernquist,et al.  MINIMUM RADII OF SUPER-EARTHS: CONSTRAINTS FROM GIANT IMPACTS , 2010, 1003.0451.

[45]  Dale P. Cruikshank,et al.  The solar system beyond Neptune , 2008 .

[46]  Harold F. Levison,et al.  On the Character and Consequences of Large Impacts in the Late Stage of Terrestrial Planet Formation , 1999 .

[47]  Eiichiro Kokubo,et al.  FORMATION OF TERRESTRIAL PLANETS FROM PROTOPLANETS UNDER A REALISTIC ACCRETION CONDITION , 2010, 1003.4384.

[48]  S. Weidenschilling Initial sizes of planetesimals and accretion of the asteroids , 2011 .

[49]  Austin,et al.  KEPLER'S FIRST ROCKY PLANET: KEPLER-10b , 2011, 1102.0605.

[50]  S. Aarseth,et al.  N-body simulations of planetary formation , 1990, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.

[51]  Sarah T. Stewart,et al.  Dynamic fault weakening and the formation of large impact craters , 2009 .

[52]  S. Ida,et al.  A POPULATION OF VERY HOT SUPER-EARTHS IN MULTIPLE-PLANET SYSTEMS SHOULD BE UNCOVERED BY KEPLER , 2010, 1010.3705.

[53]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  The formation of asteroid satellites in large impacts: Results from numerical simulations , 2004 .

[54]  Z. Leinhardt,et al.  N-body simulations of planetesimal evolution: Effect of varying impactor mass ratio , 2001 .

[55]  J. Chambers Making More Terrestrial Planets , 2001 .

[56]  D. Lin,et al.  Dynamical Shake-up of Planetary Systems. I. Embryo Trapping and Induced Collisions by the Sweeping Secular Resonance and Embryo-Disk Tidal Interaction , 2005 .

[57]  Derek C. Richardson,et al.  Karin cluster formation by asteroid impact , 2006 .

[58]  E. Kokubo,et al.  Formation of Protoplanet Systems and Diversity of Planetary Systems , 2002 .

[59]  Harold F. Levison,et al.  Asteroids Were Born Big , 2009, 0907.2512.

[60]  Howard Isaacson,et al.  The Occurrence and Mass Distribution of Close-in Super-Earths, Neptunes, and Jupiters , 2010, Science.

[61]  Karim Shariff,et al.  Toward Planetesimals: Dense Chondrule Clumps in the Protoplanetary Nebula , 2008, 0804.3526.

[62]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  Impact Simulations with Fracture. I. Method and Tests , 1994 .

[63]  Manabu Kato,et al.  Ice-on-Ice Impact Experiments , 1995 .

[64]  Erik Asphaug,et al.  Similar-sized collisions and the diversity of planets , 2010 .

[65]  W. Benz,et al.  Catastrophic Disruptions Revisited , 1999 .

[66]  Jeffrey S. Oishi,et al.  Rapid planetesimal formation in turbulent circumstellar disks , 2007, Nature.

[67]  Lars Hernquist,et al.  COLLISIONAL STRIPPING AND DISRUPTION OF SUPER-EARTHS , 2009, 0907.0234.

[68]  Willy Benz,et al.  Collisional stripping of Mercury's mantle , 1988 .

[69]  Alessandro Morbidelli,et al.  A low mass for Mars from Jupiter’s early gas-driven migration , 2011, Nature.