How Do Firms Perceive Interactions with Researchers in Small Innovation Projects? Advantages and Barriers for Satisfactory Collaborations

[1]  Edward J. Malecki,et al.  The Geography of Innovation , 2021, Handbook of Regional Science.

[2]  Ann Camilla Schulze-Krogh Firms’ Absorptive Capacity for Research-Based Collaboration—an Analysis of a Norwegian R&D Brokering Policy Program , 2018 .

[3]  M. Savona,et al.  University–industry linkages and academic engagements: individual behaviours and firms’ barriers. Introduction to the special section , 2017 .

[4]  Markus M. Bugge,et al.  Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? , 2017 .

[5]  M. Savona,et al.  University–industry linkages and academic engagements: individual behaviours and firms’ barriers. Introduction to the special section , 2017, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[6]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  Innovation Policy: Rationales, Lessons and Challenges , 2017 .

[7]  Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al.  The effects of non-academic work experience on external interaction and research performance , 2017 .

[8]  S. Iammarino,et al.  Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry , 2017 .

[9]  Nicola Costantino,et al.  Factors affecting the diffusion and success of collaborative interactions between university and industry: The case of research services , 2016 .

[10]  F. Tödtling,et al.  Innovation policies for regional structuralchange: Combining actor-based andsystem-based strategies , 2016 .

[11]  Marco Sabbadin Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D , 2016 .

[12]  Claudia De Fuentes,et al.  Geographic proximity and university–industry interaction: the case of Mexico , 2016 .

[13]  B. Martin R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know , 2016 .

[14]  Michaela Trippl,et al.  The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria , 2015 .

[15]  Michaela Trippl,et al.  Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis , 2014 .

[16]  Ken Dovey Territorial Development and Action Research: Innovation through Dialogue , 2014 .

[17]  L. N. Safiullin,et al.  The Triple Helix Model of Innovation , 2014 .

[18]  Giuseppe Calignano UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO'S TRANSACTIONAL RELATIONS: ASSESSING THE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER OF A PUBLIC UNIVERSITY IN ITALY , 2014 .

[19]  A. Widener Where The Researchers Are , 2014 .

[20]  Oliver Plum,et al.  Knowledge bases, innovativeness and competitiveness in creative industries: the case of Hamburg’s video game developers , 2014 .

[21]  Steinar Kvale,et al.  Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun , 2014 .

[22]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 11 . 06 Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations : what type of proximity does really matter ? , 2011 .

[23]  X. Gellynck,et al.  The importance of networks for knowledge exchange and innovation in the food industry , 2013 .

[24]  A. Whalley,et al.  Universities and Regional Development , 2013 .

[25]  A. Salter,et al.  Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .

[26]  S. Jakobsen,et al.  Continuity and change in path-dependent regional policy development: The regional implementation of the Norwegian VRI programme , 2012 .

[27]  M. Savona,et al.  What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers , 2012 .

[28]  Marinko Škare,et al.  The Role of Universities in Regional Development , 2012 .

[29]  Azele Mathieu,et al.  University-Industry interactions and knowledge transfer mechanisms: a critical survey , 2011 .

[30]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Innovating in the Periphery: Firms, Values and Innovation in Southwest Norway , 2011 .

[31]  Andrés Rodríguez-Pose,et al.  When local interaction does not suffice : Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway , 2011 .

[32]  Christoph Grimpe,et al.  Delay and Secrecy: Does Industry Sponsorship Jeopardize Disclosure of Academic Research? , 2011 .

[33]  A. Isaksen,et al.  Different Modes of Innovation and the Challenge of Connecting Universities and Industry: Case Studies of Two Regional Industries in Norway , 2010 .

[34]  Claudia De Fuentes,et al.  Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico , 2010 .

[35]  Claudia De Fuentes,et al.  Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and benefits for both agents: evidence from Mexico , 2010 .

[36]  E. Giuliani,et al.  Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy , 2010 .

[37]  F. Lissoni,et al.  University Research and Public–Private Interaction , 2010 .

[38]  G. Easton Critical realism in case study research , 2010 .

[39]  Valeria Arza,et al.  What drives the formation of ‘valuable’ university–industry linkages?: Insights from the wine industry , 2009 .

[40]  Ana M. Bernardos,et al.  Critical factors for success in university-industry research projects , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[41]  Toshihiro Kodama,et al.  The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages—An empirical study of TAMA in Japan , 2008 .

[42]  Maryann Feldman,et al.  Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..

[43]  Pablo D'Este,et al.  University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .

[44]  Harvey Goldstein,et al.  Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches , 2007 .

[45]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Triple Helix Model for Innovation: The University-industry-government interaction , 2007 .

[46]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Explaining Spatial Patterns of Innovation: Analytical and Synthetic Modes of Knowledge Creation in the Medicon Valley Life-Science Cluster , 2008 .

[47]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[48]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Knowledge bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. , 2005 .

[49]  Anthony Arundel,et al.  Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .

[50]  R. Nelson The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .

[51]  Cheryl Conway,et al.  Tiers of Engagement by Universities in their Region's Development , 2003 .

[52]  David Charles,et al.  Universities and Territorial Development: Reshaping the Regional Role of UK Universities , 2003 .

[53]  H. Chesbrough The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .

[54]  Rajneesh Narula,et al.  Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in , 2002 .

[55]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[56]  B. Lundvall,et al.  National systems of production, innovation and competence building , 2002 .

[57]  Rebecca Henderson,et al.  Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[58]  Philip Cooke,et al.  Biotechnology Clusters in the U.K.: Lessons from Localisation in the Commercialisation of Science , 2001 .

[59]  L. Leydesdorff,et al.  The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .

[60]  P. Cooke,et al.  Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .

[61]  R. Burgess The Research Foundations of Graduate Education , 1996 .

[62]  Jacqueline Senker,et al.  Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkage in three technologies , 1994 .

[63]  B. Dalum National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .

[64]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .

[65]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .