How Do Firms Perceive Interactions with Researchers in Small Innovation Projects? Advantages and Barriers for Satisfactory Collaborations
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Edward J. Malecki,et al. The Geography of Innovation , 2021, Handbook of Regional Science.
[2] Ann Camilla Schulze-Krogh. Firms’ Absorptive Capacity for Research-Based Collaboration—an Analysis of a Norwegian R&D Brokering Policy Program , 2018 .
[3] M. Savona,et al. University–industry linkages and academic engagements: individual behaviours and firms’ barriers. Introduction to the special section , 2017 .
[4] Markus M. Bugge,et al. Advancing regional innovation systems: What does evolutionary economic geography bring to the policy table? , 2017 .
[5] M. Savona,et al. University–industry linkages and academic engagements: individual behaviours and firms’ barriers. Introduction to the special section , 2017, The Journal of Technology Transfer.
[6] Jan Fagerberg,et al. Innovation Policy: Rationales, Lessons and Challenges , 2017 .
[7] Magnus Gulbrandsen,et al. The effects of non-academic work experience on external interaction and research performance , 2017 .
[8] S. Iammarino,et al. Academic inventors: collaboration and proximity with industry , 2017 .
[9] Nicola Costantino,et al. Factors affecting the diffusion and success of collaborative interactions between university and industry: The case of research services , 2016 .
[10] F. Tödtling,et al. Innovation policies for regional structuralchange: Combining actor-based andsystem-based strategies , 2016 .
[11] Marco Sabbadin. Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D , 2016 .
[12] Claudia De Fuentes,et al. Geographic proximity and university–industry interaction: the case of Mexico , 2016 .
[13] B. Martin. R&D policy instruments – a critical review of what we do and don’t know , 2016 .
[14] Michaela Trippl,et al. The Role of Universities in Regional Development: Conceptual Models and Policy Institutions in the UK, Sweden and Austria , 2015 .
[15] Michaela Trippl,et al. Regional industrial path development in different regional innovation systems: A conceptual analysis , 2014 .
[16] Ken Dovey. Territorial Development and Action Research: Innovation through Dialogue , 2014 .
[17] L. N. Safiullin,et al. The Triple Helix Model of Innovation , 2014 .
[18] Giuseppe Calignano. UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO'S TRANSACTIONAL RELATIONS: ASSESSING THE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER OF A PUBLIC UNIVERSITY IN ITALY , 2014 .
[19] A. Widener. Where The Researchers Are , 2014 .
[20] Oliver Plum,et al. Knowledge bases, innovativeness and competitiveness in creative industries: the case of Hamburg’s video game developers , 2014 .
[21] Steinar Kvale,et al. Den kvalitativa forskningsintervjun , 2014 .
[22] Pablo D'Este,et al. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 11 . 06 Shaping the formation of university-industry research collaborations : what type of proximity does really matter ? , 2011 .
[23] X. Gellynck,et al. The importance of networks for knowledge exchange and innovation in the food industry , 2013 .
[24] A. Whalley,et al. Universities and Regional Development , 2013 .
[25] A. Salter,et al. Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations , 2012 .
[26] S. Jakobsen,et al. Continuity and change in path-dependent regional policy development: The regional implementation of the Norwegian VRI programme , 2012 .
[27] M. Savona,et al. What hampers innovation? Revealed barriers versus deterring barriers , 2012 .
[28] Marinko Škare,et al. The Role of Universities in Regional Development , 2012 .
[29] Azele Mathieu,et al. University-Industry interactions and knowledge transfer mechanisms: a critical survey , 2011 .
[30] A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al. Innovating in the Periphery: Firms, Values and Innovation in Southwest Norway , 2011 .
[31] Andrés Rodríguez-Pose,et al. When local interaction does not suffice : Sources of firm innovation in urban Norway , 2011 .
[32] Christoph Grimpe,et al. Delay and Secrecy: Does Industry Sponsorship Jeopardize Disclosure of Academic Research? , 2011 .
[33] A. Isaksen,et al. Different Modes of Innovation and the Challenge of Connecting Universities and Industry: Case Studies of Two Regional Industries in Norway , 2010 .
[34] Claudia De Fuentes,et al. Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and their benefits: evidence from Mexico , 2010 .
[35] Claudia De Fuentes,et al. Channels of interaction between public research organisations and industry and benefits for both agents: evidence from Mexico , 2010 .
[36] E. Giuliani,et al. Who are the researchers that are collaborating with industry? An analysis of the wine sectors in Chile, South Africa and Italy , 2010 .
[37] F. Lissoni,et al. University Research and Public–Private Interaction , 2010 .
[38] G. Easton. Critical realism in case study research , 2010 .
[39] Valeria Arza,et al. What drives the formation of ‘valuable’ university–industry linkages?: Insights from the wine industry , 2009 .
[40] Ana M. Bernardos,et al. Critical factors for success in university-industry research projects , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..
[41] Toshihiro Kodama,et al. The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages—An empirical study of TAMA in Japan , 2008 .
[42] Maryann Feldman,et al. Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level , 2008, Organ. Sci..
[43] Pablo D'Este,et al. University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors underlying the variety of interactions with industry? , 2007 .
[44] Harvey Goldstein,et al. Assessing the Regional Economic Development Impacts of Universities: A Review of Current Approaches , 2007 .
[45] Henry Etzkowitz,et al. The Triple Helix Model for Innovation: The University-industry-government interaction , 2007 .
[46] Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al. Explaining Spatial Patterns of Innovation: Analytical and Synthetic Modes of Knowledge Creation in the Medicon Valley Life-Science Cluster , 2008 .
[47] J. Fagerberg,et al. The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .
[48] Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al. Knowledge bases and Regional Innovation Systems: Comparing Nordic Clusters. , 2005 .
[49] Anthony Arundel,et al. Proximity and the use of public science by innovative European firms , 2004 .
[50] R. Nelson. The market economy, and the scientific commons , 2004 .
[51] Cheryl Conway,et al. Tiers of Engagement by Universities in their Region's Development , 2003 .
[52] David Charles,et al. Universities and Territorial Development: Reshaping the Regional Role of UK Universities , 2003 .
[53] H. Chesbrough. The Era of Open Innovation , 2003 .
[54] Rajneesh Narula,et al. Innovation systems and ‘inertia’ in R&D location: Norwegian firms and the role of systemic lock-in , 2002 .
[55] S. Zahra,et al. Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .
[56] B. Lundvall,et al. National systems of production, innovation and competence building , 2002 .
[57] Rebecca Henderson,et al. Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: Putting Patents in Context: Exploring Knowledge Transfer from MIT , 2002, Manag. Sci..
[58] Philip Cooke,et al. Biotechnology Clusters in the U.K.: Lessons from Localisation in the Commercialisation of Science , 2001 .
[59] L. Leydesdorff,et al. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and , 2000 .
[60] P. Cooke,et al. Regional innovation systems: Institutional and organisational dimensions , 1997 .
[61] R. Burgess. The Research Foundations of Graduate Education , 1996 .
[62] Jacqueline Senker,et al. Making sense of diversity: public-private sector research linkage in three technologies , 1994 .
[63] B. Dalum. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning , 1992 .
[64] Michael E. Porter,et al. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. , 1990 .
[65] Daniel A. Levinthal,et al. ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .