Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and out-of-field cell survival responses to passive scattering and pencil beam scanning proton beam deliveries

The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of passive scattered (PS) and pencil beam scanned (PBS) proton beam delivery techniques for uniform beam configurations was determined by clonogenic survival. The radiobiological impact of modulated beam configurations on cell survival occurring in- or out-of-field for both delivery techniques was determined with intercellular communication intact or physically inhibited. Cell survival responses were compared to those observed using a 6 MV photon beam produced with a linear accelerator. DU-145 cells showed no significant difference in survival response to proton beams delivered by PS and PBS or 6 MV photons taking into account a RBE of 1.1 for protons at the centre of the spread out Bragg peak. Significant out-of-field effects similar to those observed for 6 MV photons were observed for both PS and PBS proton deliveries with cell survival decreasing to 50-60% survival for scattered doses of 0.05 and 0.03 Gy for passive scattered and pencil beam scanned beams respectively. The observed out-of-field responses were shown to be dependent on intercellular communication between the in- and out-of-field cell populations. These data demonstrate, for the first time, a similar RBE between passive and actively scanned proton beams and confirm that out-of-field effects may be important determinants of cell survival following exposure to modulated photon and proton fields.

[1]  N Suchowerska,et al.  Cellular response to modulated radiation fields , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  H Paganetti,et al.  Elevated LET components in clinical proton beams , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  M Goitein,et al.  Biophysical modelling of proton radiation effects based on amorphous track models , 2001, International journal of radiation biology.

[4]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Range uncertainty in proton therapy due to variable biological effectiveness. , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  A review of dosimetry studies on external-beam radiation treatment with respect to second cancer induction , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  A. Hounsell,et al.  Dose, dose-rate and field size effects on cell survival following exposure to non-uniform radiation fields , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  Richard Pötter,et al.  Treatment planning comparison of conventional, 3D conformal, and intensity-modulated photon (IMRT) and proton therapy for paranasal sinus carcinoma. , 2004, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  Alexei Trofimov,et al.  Radiotherapy treatment of early-stage prostate cancer with IMRT and protons: a treatment planning comparison. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  N Suchowerska,et al.  In vitro response of tumour cells to non-uniform irradiation , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  U Oelfke,et al.  Measurements of relative biological effectiveness of the 70 MeV proton beam at TRIUMF using Chinese hamster V79 cells and the high-precision cell sorter assay. , 1996, Radiation research.

[11]  Masahiko Watanabe,et al.  Comparison of biological effectiveness of carbon-ion beams in Japan and Germany. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Anatoly Rosenfeld,et al.  Assessment of out-of-field absorbed dose and equivalent dose in proton fields. , 2009, Medical physics.

[13]  A J Lomax,et al.  A treatment planning inter-comparison of proton and intensity modulated photon radiotherapy. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  A. Hounsell,et al.  Out-of-field cell survival following exposure to intensity-modulated radiation fields. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  H. Blattmann Beam delivery systems for charged particles , 1992, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[16]  Harald Paganetti,et al.  Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Kevin M. Prise,et al.  Radiation-induced bystander signalling in cancer therapy , 2009, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[18]  C. Mothersill,et al.  Medium from irradiated human epithelial cells but not human fibroblasts reduces the clonogenic survival of unirradiated cells. , 1997, International journal of radiation biology.

[19]  A. Hounsell,et al.  Cell Survival Responses after Exposure to Modulated Radiation Fields , 2012, Radiation research.

[20]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[21]  Zuofeng Li,et al.  Prescribing, Recording, and Reporting Proton-Beam Therapy , 2009 .

[22]  R. Mohan,et al.  Preclinical biologic assessment of proton beam relative biologic effectiveness at Proton Therapy Center Houston. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.