The use of noise equivalent count rate and the NEMA phantom for PET image quality evaluation.

PET image quality is directly associated with two important parameters among others: count-rate performance and image signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The framework of noise equivalent count rate (NECR) was developed back in the 1990s and has been widely used since then to evaluate count-rate performance for PET systems. The concept of NECR is not entirely straightforward, however, and among the issues requiring clarification are its original definition, its relationship to image quality, and its consistency among different derivation methods. In particular, we try to answer whether a higher NECR measurement using a standard NEMA phantom actually corresponds to better imaging performance. The paper includes the following topics: 1) revisiting the original analytical model for NECR derivation; 2) validating three methods for NECR calculation based on the NEMA phantom/standard; and 3) studying the spatial dependence of NECR and quantitative relationship between NECR and image SNR.

[1]  Z. Burbar,et al.  The ECAT HRRT: an example of NEMA scatter estimation issues for LSO based PET systems , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[2]  Val J Lowe,et al.  NEMA NU 2-2001 performance measurements of an LYSO-based PET/CT system in 2D and 3D acquisition modes. , 2006, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  P E Kinahan,et al.  Measured count-rate performance of the Discovery STE PET/CT scanner in 2D, 3D and partial collimation acquisition modes , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[4]  E. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring PET scanner sensitivity: relating countrates to image signal-to-noise ratios using noise equivalents counts , 1990 .

[5]  V. Bettinardi,et al.  Performance measurements for the PET/CT Discovery-600 using NEMA NU 2-2007 standards. , 2011, Medical physics.

[6]  T. Budinger.  Time-of-flight positron emission tomography: status relative to conventional PET. , 1983, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  David Brasse,et al.  Correction methods for random coincidences in fully 3D whole-body PET: impact on data and image quality. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  John W. Clark,et al.  Reliability of predicting image signal-to-noise ratio using noise equivalent count rate in PET imaging. , 2012, Medical physics.

[9]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Optimization of injected dose based on noise equivalent count rates for 2- and 3-dimensional whole-body PET. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  Stefan Eberl,et al.  Optimizing injected dose in clinical PET by accurately modeling the counting-rate response functions specific to individual patient scans. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Roberta Matheoud,et al.  Performance characteristics obtained for a new 3-dimensional lutetium oxyorthosilicate-based whole-body PET/CT scanner with the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2001 standard. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  T. Beyer,et al.  Evaluation of clinical PET count rate performance , 2002 .

[13]  S. Surti,et al.  Count-rate dependent event mispositioning and NEC in PET , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  Hao Peng,et al.  Design study of a high-resolution breast-dedicated PET system built from cadmium zinc telluride detectors , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[15]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  PET: Physics, Instrumentation, and Scanners , 2006 .

[16]  J. Karp,et al.  Evaluation of image Signal-to-Noise Ratio in Time-of-Flight PET , 2011, 2011 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[17]  C Lartizien,et al.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.