The Relevance of Social Theory in the Practice of Environmental Management

In this paper I argue that the dominance of certain paradigms and theories on policies can have an influence on the value added by impact assessments. A link exists between paradigms and theories and policies and consequently the practices humans develop to tackle real world problems. I also argue that different types of thinking (contained in paradigms and theories) need to be integrated, at least at the scientific level, to enhance our understanding of social phenomena. This in turn can have a positive influence on policy processes that follow impact assessment recommendations. I am not arguing for the adoption of theoretical positions by practitioners, Instead, I contend that if impact assessments are informed by a variety of paradigms and theories, the policy practitioner might have a better understanding of the issue and the moral choices he or she needs to make. I will highlight the connection between theory and policies with practical examples from the social impact assessment of the De Hoop Dam, which was constructed on the Steelpoort River. I also argue for an integration of different theories to give a deeper understanding of real world problems.

[1]  C. Wight,et al.  International Relations and Social Science , 2013 .

[2]  J. Rosenau.  Governance Without Government: Governance, order, and change in world politics , 1992 .

[3]  R. Lebow.  A Cultural Theory of International Relations: Frontmatter , 2008 .

[4]  R. Lebow.  What Can We Know? How Do We Know? , 2007 .

[5]  Sharon Pollard,et al.  Towards Adaptive Integrated Water Resources Management in Southern Africa: The Role of Self-organisation and Multi-scale Feedbacks for Learning and Responsiveness in the Letaba and Crocodile Catchments , 2011 .

[6]  William R. Sheate,et al.  Knowledge brokerage - potential for increased capacities and shared power in impact assessment , 2013 .

[7]  N. Funke,et al.  The politics of establishing catchment management agencies in South Africa: the case of the Breede–Overberg Catchment Management Agency , 2016 .

[8]  R. Meissner.  Interest groups and the proposed Epupa Dam : towards a theory of water politics , 2005 .

[9]  R. Cox.  Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory , 1981, Culture, Ideology, and World Order.

[10]  E. Guba,et al.  Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. , 2005 .

[11]  Allan Curtis,et al.  Nipped in the Bud: Why Regional Scale Adaptive Management Is Not Blooming , 2005, Environmental management.

[12]  J. Rosenau.  The theoretical imperative: Unavoidable explication , 2003 .

[13]  George H. Stankey,et al.  Adaptive Management and the Northwest Forest Plan: Rhetoric and Reality , 2003, Journal of Forestry.

[14]  M. Hoffmann.  Constructing a complex world: The frontiers of international relations theory and foreign policy‐making , 2003 .

[15]  R. Cox,et al.  Approaches to world order: Beyond international relations theory: Robert W. Cox and approaches to world order , 1996 .

[16]  R. Weber.  Editor's comments: the rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: a personal view , 2004 .

[17]  Bram F. Noble,et al.  Promise and dismay: The state of strategic environmental assessment systems and practices in Canada , 2009 .

[18]  R. Meissner.  The Governance of Urban Wastewater Treatment Infrastructure in the Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality and the Application of Analytic Eclecticism , 2015 .

[19]  David A. Lake.  Theory is dead, long live theory: The end of the Great Debates and the rise of eclecticism in International Relations , 2013 .

[20]  C. Wight,et al.  After Postpositivism? The Promises of Critical Realism , 2000 .

[21]  A. Isaacman,et al.  Dams, Displacement, and the Delusion of Development: Cahora Bassa and Its Legacies in Mozambique, 1965–2007 , 2013 .

[22]  J. Goldstone.  Usable Theory: Analytic Tools for Social and Political Research , 2011 .

[23]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Walking the sustainability assessment talk — Progressing the practice of environmental impact assessment (EIA) , 2012 .

[24]  S. Walt,et al.  Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations , 2013 .

[25]  S. Hilton,et al.  The pursuit of ignorance , 2016, British Medical Journal.

[26]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[27]  M. Zacher,et al.  Governance Without Government: The decaying pillars of the Westphalian temple: implications for international order and governance , 1992 .

[28]  N. Funke,et al.  The status quo of research on South Africa's water resource management institutions , 2013 .

[29]  P. Morgan.  National and international security: Theory then, theory now , 2003 .

[30]  E. Herring.  Response to Mervyn Frost: The systematic violation of ethical norms in British Foreign Policy , 1999 .

[31]  R. Duvall,et al.  On the practical significance of critical international relations theory , 2003 .

[32]  R. Meissner.  The transnational role and involvement of interest groups in water politics : a comparative analysis of selected Southern African case studies , 2006 .

[33]  A. Toje.  Ethics in Foreign Policy: Bridging the Gap between Theory and Practice , 2002 .

[34]  J. Hobson,et al.  Everyday Politics of the World Economy: Everyday IPE: revealing everyday forms of change in the world economy , 2007 .

[35]  M. Claassen.  Integrated Water Resource Management in South Africa , 2013 .

[36]  J. Hobson,et al.  1 Everyday IPE : revealing everyday forms of change in the world economy , 2007 .