Creating a neuroprosthesis for active tactile exploration of textures

Significance Sensory neuroprostheses offer the promise of restoring perceptual function to people with impaired sensation. Here, we developed a paradigm using intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) for encoding the sensation of fingertip motion against texture. Monkeys learned to interpret time-varying ICMS patterns, evoked by the interplay of their voluntary movements and specific object textures, and discriminated texture coarseness relying solely on these pulse trains. As such, variations in exploration strategy directly affected the timing of individual stimulation pulses. Crucially, this encoding enabled real-time active exploration of textures. We propose that this approach could equip upper-limb neuroprostheses with functional access to texture features acquired during active exploration of natural objects. Intracortical microstimulation (ICMS) of the primary somatosensory cortex (S1) can produce percepts that mimic somatic sensation and, thus, has potential as an approach to sensorize prosthetic limbs. However, it is not known whether ICMS could recreate active texture exploration—the ability to infer information about object texture by using one’s fingertips to scan a surface. Here, we show that ICMS of S1 can convey information about the spatial frequencies of invisible virtual gratings through a process of active tactile exploration. Two rhesus monkeys scanned pairs of visually identical screen objects with the fingertip of a hand avatar—controlled first via a joystick and later via a brain–machine interface—to find the object with denser virtual gratings. The gratings consisted of evenly spaced ridges that were signaled through individual ICMS pulses generated whenever the avatar’s fingertip crossed a ridge. The monkeys learned to interpret these ICMS patterns, evoked by the interplay of their voluntary movements and the virtual textures of each object, to perform a sensory discrimination task. Discrimination accuracy followed Weber’s law of just-noticeable differences (JND) across a range of grating densities; a finding that matches normal cutaneous sensation. Moreover, 1 monkey developed an active scanning strategy where avatar velocity was integrated with the ICMS pulses to interpret the texture information. We propose that this approach could equip upper-limb neuroprostheses with direct access to texture features acquired during active exploration of natural objects.

[1]  Mikhail A Lebedev,et al.  Virtual Active Touch Using Randomly Patterned Intracortical Microstimulation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[2]  Eric E. Thomson,et al.  Perceiving Invisible Light through a Somatosensory Cortical Prosthesis , 2013, Nature Communications.

[3]  T. Kuiken,et al.  Sensory capacity of reinnervated skin after redirection of amputated upper limb nerves to the chest , 2009, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[4]  P. Rossini,et al.  Intraneural stimulation elicits discrimination of textural features by artificial fingertip in intact and amputee humans , 2016, eLife.

[5]  Robert A. Gaunt,et al.  Progress towards restoring upper limb movement and sensation through intracortical brain-computer interfaces , 2018, Current Opinion in Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  E. Moberg Criticism and studvy of methods for examining sensibility in the hand* , 1962, Neurology.

[7]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  A closed-loop hand prosthesis with simultaneous intraneural tactile and position feedback , 2018, Science Robotics.

[8]  J. Randall Flanagan,et al.  Coding and use of tactile signals from the fingertips in object manipulation tasks , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Solaiman Shokur,et al.  A Brain-Machine Interface Enables Bimanual Arm Movements in Monkeys , 2013, Science Translational Medicine.

[10]  Hannes Bleuler,et al.  Active tactile exploration enabled by a brain-machine-brain interface , 2011, Nature.

[11]  J. Flanagan,et al.  Modulation of grip force with load force during point-to-point arm movements , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[12]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Expanding the primate body schema in sensorimotor cortex by virtual touches of an avatar , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  Stephen T. Foldes,et al.  Intracortical microstimulation of human somatosensory cortex , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.

[14]  M. Sommer,et al.  Corollary discharge across the animal kingdom , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[15]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  R. Romo,et al.  Somatosensory discrimination based on cortical microstimulation , 1998, Nature.

[17]  Joseph E O'Doherty,et al.  A learning–based approach to artificial sensory feedback leads to optimal integration , 2014, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Mikhail A Lebedev,et al.  Stochastic Facilitation of Artificial Tactile Sensation in Primates , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The neural basis of the Weber–Fechner law: a logarithmic mental number line , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[20]  Silvestro Micera,et al.  Multisensory bionic limb to achieve prosthesis embodiment and reduce distorted phantom limb perceptions , 2018, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[21]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[22]  Gislin Dagnelie,et al.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis , 2003, Vision Research.

[23]  Sliman J. Bensmaia,et al.  High-dimensional representation of texture in somatosensory cortex of primates , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  E. Fetz,et al.  Direct electrical stimulation of the somatosensory cortex in humans using electrocorticography electrodes: a qualitative and quantitative report , 2013, Journal of neural engineering.

[25]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Brain–machine interfaces: past, present and future , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[26]  S. Bolanowski,et al.  Four channels mediate the mechanical aspects of touch. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  N A Fitzsimmons,et al.  Primate Reaching Cued by Multichannel Spatiotemporal Cortical Microstimulation , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[28]  Joseph E. O’Doherty,et al.  Unscented Kalman Filter for Brain-Machine Interfaces , 2009, PloS one.

[29]  S. Bensmaia,et al.  Behavioral assessment of sensitivity to intracortical microstimulation of primate somatosensory cortex , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[30]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[31]  G. Ekman Weber's Law and Related Functions , 1959 .

[32]  R. S. Johansson,et al.  Roles of glabrous skin receptors and sensorimotor memory in automatic control of precision grip when lifting rougher or more slippery objects , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[33]  D. Vorberg,et al.  Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: Pitfalls and improved estimators , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[34]  William M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Better speech recognition with cochlear implants , 1991, Nature.

[35]  M. Keith,et al.  A neural interface provides long-term stable natural touch perception , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[36]  D. Atkins,et al.  Epidemiologic Overview of Individuals with Upper-Limb Loss and Their Reported Research Priorities , 1996 .

[37]  Jeffrey G. Ojemann,et al.  Ownership of an artificial limb induced by electrical brain stimulation , 2016, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  Miguel A L Nicolelis,et al.  Embedding a Panoramic Representation of Infrared Light in the Adult Rat Somatosensory Cortex through a Sensory Neuroprosthesis , 2016, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  D. J. Warren,et al.  A neural interface for a cortical vision prosthesis , 1999, Vision Research.

[40]  Luca Citi,et al.  Restoring Natural Sensory Feedback in Real-Time Bidirectional Hand Prostheses , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[41]  Jack W. Judy,et al.  Perceived intensity of somatosensory cortical electrical stimulation , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  Benoit P. Delhaye,et al.  The neural basis of perceived intensity in natural and artificial touch , 2016, Science Translational Medicine.