Reliability analysis for preventive maintenance based on classical and Bayesian semi-parametric degradation approaches using locomotive wheel-sets as a case study

This paper undertakes a general reliability study using both classical and Bayesian semi-parametric degradation approaches. The goal is to illustrate how degradation data can be modelled and analysed to flexibly determine reliability to support preventive maintenance strategy making, based on a general data-driven framework. With the proposed classical approach, both accelerated life tests (ALT) and design of experiments (DOE) technology are used to determine how each critical factor affects the prediction of performance. With the Bayesian semi-parametric approach, a piecewise constant hazard regression model is used to establish the lifetime using degradation data. Gamma frailties are included to explore the influence of unobserved covariates within the same group. Ideally, results from the classical and Bayesian approaches will complement each other. To demonstrate these approaches, this paper considers a case study of locomotive wheel-set reliability. The degradation data are prepared by considering an Exponential and a Power degradation path separately. The results show that both classical and Bayesian semi-parametric approaches are useful tools to analyse degradation data and can, therefore, support a company in decision making for preventive maintenance. The approach can be applied to other technical problems (e.g. other industries, other components).

[1]  Enrico A. Colosimo,et al.  Using degradation data to assess reliability: a case study on train wheel degradation , 2009, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[2]  Aditya Parida,et al.  Reliability Analysis for Degradation of Locomotive Wheels using Parametric Bayesian Approach , 2014, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[3]  Wei Zhan,et al.  A Design of Experiment (DOE) Analysis of the Performance of Uplink Real-Time Traffic over a 3G Network , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Wireless and Mobile Computing, Networking and Communications.

[4]  W. Nelson Statistical Methods for Reliability Data , 1998 .

[5]  Thomas C. M. Lee,et al.  Model Selection for the Competing-Risks Model With and Without Masking , 2005, Technometrics.

[6]  Jorge Ambrósio,et al.  A Railway Wheel Wear Prediction Tool Based on Multibody Software , 2008 .

[7]  N. G. Best,et al.  WinBUGS User Manual: Version 1.4 , 2001 .

[8]  D K Dey,et al.  A Weibull Regression Model with Gamma Frailties for Multivariate Survival Data , 1997, Lifetime data analysis.

[9]  D. Clayton A model for association in bivariate life tables and its application in epidemiological studies of familial tendency in chronic disease incidence , 1978 .

[10]  S. Rahman Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 2011 .

[11]  Johann Sölkner,et al.  Frailty Models in Survival Analysis , 1996 .

[12]  Tongdan Jin,et al.  Degradation Modeling and Maintenance Decisions Based on Bayesian Belief Networks , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[13]  Mikael Palo Condition-based maintenance for effective and efficient rolling stock capacity assurance : A study on heavy haul transport in Sweden , 2014 .

[14]  Xi Liu,et al.  Bayesian Analysis for Accelerated Life Tests Using a Dirichlet Process Weibull Mixture Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[15]  M. May Bayesian Survival Analysis. , 2002 .

[16]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Multiaxial fatigue reliability analysis of railroad wheels , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Mauro Filippini,et al.  An integrated approach to rolling contact sub surface fatigue assesment of railway wheels , 2003 .

[18]  Peter Söderholm A system view of the No Fault Found (NFF) phenomenon , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Chunsheng Yang,et al.  Learning to predict train wheel failures , 2005, KDD '05.

[20]  Rob Dwyer-Joyce,et al.  A numerical model of twin disc test arrangement for the evaluation of railway wheel wear prediction methods , 2010 .

[21]  Kamran S. Moghaddam,et al.  Sensitivity analysis and comparison of algorithms in preventive maintenance and replacement scheduling optimization models , 2011, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[22]  Agostino G. Bruzzone,et al.  Design of Experiment and Monte Carlo Simulation as Support for Gas Turbine Power Plant Availability Estimation , 2003, Modelling, Identification and Control.

[23]  P. Clayton,et al.  Tribological aspects of wheel-rail contact: a review of recent experimental research , 1996 .

[24]  Farhad Kolahan,et al.  A reliability-based approach to optimize preventive maintenance scheduling for coherent systems , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  Anders Johansson,et al.  Out-of-round railway wheels—a study of wheel polygonalization through simulation of three-dimensional wheel–rail interaction and wear , 2005 .

[26]  Brian Veitch,et al.  A virtual experimental technique for data collection for a Bayesian network approach to human reliability analysis , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[27]  Stefano Bruni,et al.  A mathematical model to predict railway wheel profile evolution due to wear , 2006 .

[28]  Manuel Mazo,et al.  Design and signal processing of a magnetic sensor array for train wheel detection , 2006 .

[29]  Robert L. Grossman,et al.  KDD-2005 : proceedings of the Eleventh ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, August 21-24, 2005, Chicago, Illinois, USA , 2005 .

[30]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Structural Health Monitoring of Railroad Wheels Using Wheel Impact Load Detectors , 2007 .

[31]  J. Bert Keats,et al.  Statistical Methods for Reliability Data , 1999 .

[32]  Dimitris Skarlatos,et al.  Railway wheel fault diagnosis using a fuzzy-logic method , 2004 .

[33]  Dipak K. Dey,et al.  A class of dynamic piecewise exponential models with random time grid , 2012 .