Advances in modelling animal - vegetation interactions and their use in guiding grazing management.

Grazing managers and scientists are faced with new social concerns, such as those relating to the environmental ‘value’ of grazinglands, which are no longer viewed as ‘natural forages’ only. Scientists need to design new models that include a set of decision rules about how to graze animals under multiple objectives. To study how an animal perceives and moves through its environment, grazing has to be considered as an ecological process. Hence, it is crucial to re-scale grazing mechanisms within spatial and temporal levels. Our paper then presents recent advances in the knowledge of animal social behaviour and spatial memory, which help to understand how herds and flocks exploit heterogeneous environments. An analysis of three recent and still developing grazing models finally enables us to discuss how this knowledge can be incorporated into research models. We refute the classic ‘carrying capacity’ paradigm that ignores one of the major aspects of herbivore at pasture : mobility. We encourage farmers to become ‘designers’ of grazing areas, using appropriate paddocking or shepherding rules to impact the animals’ spatial distribution and change their expectations about the relative value of feeding sites, in order to graze them in less preferred areas. Hopefully, recent advances in the knowledge of the cognitive abilities of herbivores open the way to a new generation of models that help to better understand how grazing managers can cope with pasture heterogeneity and variability.

[1]  Nicholas J. Hutchings,et al.  A model of the grazing of hill vegetation by sheep in the UK. I. The prediction of vegetation biomass , 1997 .

[2]  B. Manly Randomization, Bootstrap and Monte Carlo Methods in Biology , 2018 .

[3]  Anthony J. Parsons,et al.  The use of spatial memory by grazing animals to locate food patches in spatially heterogeneous environments: an example with sheep , 1996 .

[4]  C. Thouless Feeding competition between grazing red deer hinds , 1990, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  Thomas B. Starr,et al.  Hierarchy: Perspectives for Ecological Complexity , 1982 .

[6]  K. Valentine Distance from Water as a Factor in Grazing Capacity of Rangeland , 1947 .

[7]  R. Hunter HILL SHEEP AND THEIR PASTURE: A STUDY OF SHEEP- GRAZING IN SOUTH-EAST SCOTLAND , 1962 .

[8]  B. Dumont,et al.  Direct observation of biting for studying grazing behavior of goats and llamas on garrigue rangelands , 1995 .

[9]  B. Dumont,et al.  Spatial memory of sheep at pasture , 1998 .

[10]  B. Dumont,et al.  How readily will sheep walk for a preferred forage? , 1998, Journal of animal science.

[11]  Nicholas J. Hutchings,et al.  A model of the grazing of hill vegetation by sheep in the UK. II. The prediction of offtake by sheep , 1997 .

[12]  E. Laca,et al.  Mechanisms that result in large herbivore grazing distribution patterns. , 1996 .

[13]  Jacques Claude,et al.  Un espace sahélien : la mare d'Oursi, Burkina Faso , 1991 .

[14]  M. Appleby Social Rank and Food Access in Red Deer Stags , 1980 .

[15]  A. J. Rook,et al.  Synchronisation of eating, ruminating and idling activity by grazing sheep , 1991 .

[16]  Association of relative food availabilities and locations by cattle. , 1989 .

[17]  Jon M. Skovlin Range Riding-The Key to Range Management. , 1957 .

[18]  A. J. Rook,et al.  Foraging behaviour and diet selection in domestic herbivores , 1998 .

[19]  L A Real,et al.  Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture , 1991, Science.

[20]  A. Boissy,et al.  Relations sociales et comportement alimentaire au pâturage , 1999 .

[21]  C. Scott,et al.  Dietary Habits and Social Interactions Affect Choice of Feeding Location by Sheep , 1995 .

[22]  M. Meuret Organizing a grazing route to motivate intake on coarse resources , 1996 .

[23]  F. Blanc,et al.  Effects of stocking density on the behaviour and growth of farmed red deer hinds , 1998 .

[24]  P. Faverdin,et al.  Development of a mechanistic model of intake and chewing activities of sheep. , 1996, Journal of animal science.

[25]  Monica G. Turner,et al.  A landscape simulation model of winter foraging by large ungulates , 1993 .

[26]  A. Boissy,et al.  Grazing behaviour of sheep in a situation of conflict between feeding and social motivations , 2000, Behavioural Processes.

[27]  N. West Rangelands in a sustainable biosphere , 1996 .

[28]  I. Gordon,et al.  The influence of vegetation pattern on the grazing of heather moorland by red deer and sheep. I: The location of animals on grass/heather mosaics , 1995 .

[29]  F. Provenza,et al.  Socially induced diet preference ameliorates conditioned food aversion in lambs , 1991 .

[30]  Andrew W. Illius,et al.  Ecology and Management of Grazing Systems , 1997 .

[31]  Iain J. Gordon,et al.  Ecology and Management of Grazing Systems , 1997 .

[32]  L. James,et al.  Social facilitation influences cattle to graze locoweed. , 1994 .

[33]  L. Howery,et al.  Social and environmental factors influence cattle distribution on rangeland , 1998 .

[34]  Derek W. Bailey,et al.  Large Herbivore Foraging and Ecological HierarchiesLandscape ecology can enhance traditional foraging theory , 1987 .

[35]  A. Boissy,et al.  Ontogeny of social awareness in domestic herbivores , 1998 .

[36]  Mertens Methods in modelling feeding behaviour and intake in herbivores , 1996 .

[37]  M. WallisDeVries Effects of resource distribution patterns on ungulate foraging behaviour: a modelling approach. , 1996 .

[38]  B. Dumont,et al.  Utilization of heterogeneous grasslands by domestic herbivores: Theory to management , 1998 .

[39]  Dumont,et al.  The effect of the spatial distribution of plant species within the sward on the searching success of sheep when grazing , 2000 .

[40]  I. Gordon,et al.  The influence of vegetation pattern on the grazing of heather moorland by red deer and sheep. II: The impact on heather , 1995 .

[41]  C. Clark,et al.  Foraging and Flocking Strategies: Information in an Uncertain Environment , 1984, The American Naturalist.