Effect of operating parameters on the transient performance of a polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell stack with a dead-end anode

The operation of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) stack with a dead-end anode requires careful consideration on the gas and water management. Water accumulation at the anode and the nitrogen crossover from cathode to anode lead to performance deterioration over time. The accumulated water and nitrogen need to be removed properly by purging method to ensure good and stable stack performance. Thus, the careful selection of the operating parameters – inlet humidification, stoichiometry, and operating current – is the key factor for ensuring efficient water and gas management. This study aims at the experimental and numerical evaluation of the effect of the key operating parameters on the transient performance of a dead-end anode fuel cell stack. The experiments were carried out on a stack with 24 cells and a catalyst active area of 300cm2. By employing a validated transient two-phase mathematical model of a PEMFC with a dead-end anode, numerical simulations were performed which yield a better and deeper understanding of local distribution of water and species, i.e., hydrogen, oxygen, water vapor and nitrogen.

[1]  Jason B. Siegel,et al.  Degradation phenomena in PEM fuel cell with dead-ended anode , 2013 .

[2]  Arun S. Mujumdar,et al.  Numerical Investigation of Liquid Water Cooling for a Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Stack , 2011 .

[3]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Correlating Nitrogen Accumulation With Temporal Fuel Cell Performance , 2010 .

[4]  Denise A. McKay,et al.  Measurement of Liquid Water Accumulation in a PEMFC with Dead-Ended Anode , 2008 .

[5]  Agus P. Sasmito,et al.  A Factorial Study to Investigate the Purging Effect on the Performance of a Dead‐End Anode PEM Fuel Cell Stack , 2015 .

[6]  Michael Vynnycky,et al.  A Two‐Phase Non‐Isothermal PEFC Model: Theory and Validation , 2004 .

[7]  Jason B. Siegel,et al.  Optimization of Purge Cycle for Dead-Ended Anode Fuel Cell Operation , 2012 .

[8]  Olli Himanen,et al.  Operation of a planar free-breathing PEMFC in a dead-end mode , 2007 .

[9]  S. D. Fraser,et al.  Polarization study of a PEMFC with four reference electrodes at hydrogen starvation conditions , 2008 .

[10]  A.G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Modeling and validation of fuel cell water dynamics using neutron imaging , 2008, 2008 American Control Conference.

[11]  B. Wetton,et al.  Flow distribution in proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks , 2006 .

[12]  Anna G. Stefanopoulou,et al.  Parameterization and prediction of temporal fuel cell voltage behavior during flooding and drying conditions , 2008 .

[13]  Zhiping Luo,et al.  Evaluation of self-water-removal in a dead-ended proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2013 .

[14]  Jason B. Siegel,et al.  Nitrogen Front Evolution in Purged Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cell with Dead-Ended Anode , 2010 .

[15]  Xiaoping Wang,et al.  Buildup of nitrogen in direct hydrogen polymer-electrolyte fuel cell stacks. , 2007 .

[16]  Arun S. Mujumdar,et al.  Performance evaluation of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell with a dead-end anode: A computational flu , 2011 .

[17]  Suk Won Cha,et al.  Experimental study on enhancing the fuel efficiency of an anodic dead-end mode polymer electrolyte m , 2010 .

[18]  Bosung Kim,et al.  An experimental study on water transport through the membrane of a PEFC operating in the dead-end mode , 2009 .

[19]  S. Kocha,et al.  Characterization of gas crossover and its implications in PEM fuel cells , 2006 .

[20]  S. Pitchumani,et al.  Experimental analysis of spatio-temporal behavior of anodic dead-end mode operated polymer electroly , 2011 .

[21]  M. Péra,et al.  PEFC Stack Operating in Anodic Dead End Mode , 2004 .