Measuring the meaning of words in contexts: An automated analysis of controversies about 'Monarch butterflies,' 'Frankenfoods,' and 'stem cells'

SummaryCo-words have been considered as carriers of meaning across different domains in studies of science, technology, and society. Words and co-words, however, obtain meaning in sentences, and sentences obtain meaning in their contexts of use. At the science/society interface, words can be expected to have different meanings: the codes of communication that provide meaning to words differ on the varying sides of the interface. Furthermore, meanings and interfaces may change over time. Given this structuring of meaning across interfaces and over time, we distinguish between metaphors and diaphors as reflexive mechanisms that facilitate the translation between contexts. Our empirical focus is on three recent scientific controversies: Monarch butterflies, Frankenfoods, and stem-cell therapies. This study explores new avenues that relate the study of co-word analysis in context with the sociological quest for the analysis and processing of meaning.

[1]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  Nora J. Bird,et al.  The Flow of Scientific Knowledge from Lab to the Lay Public , 2004 .

[3]  George W. Furnas,et al.  Pictures of relevance: A geometric analysis of similarity measures , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[4]  D. Swanson.  Medical literature as a potential source of new knowledge. , 1990, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[5]  B. Latour,et al.  The Hume machine: can association networks do more than formal rules , 1995 .

[6]  N. Luhmann,et al.  The Cognitive Program of Constructivism and a Reality that Remains Unknown , 1990 .

[7]  L. Leydesdorff.  Luhmann's sociological theory: its operationalization and future perspectives , 1996 .

[8]  Jesper W. Schneider,et al.  Mapping scientific frontiers: The quest for knowledge visualization , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[9]  Klaus Krippendorff,et al.  Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology , 1980 .

[10]  B. Bates,et al.  Recipes or blueprints for our genes? How contexts selectively activate the multiple meanings of metaphors , 2002 .

[11]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft , 1997 .

[13]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A validation study of “LEXIMAPPE” , 1992, Scientometrics.

[14]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs , 1989, Inf. Process. Lett..

[15]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[16]  J. M. Kittross.  The measurement of meaning , 1959 .

[17]  P. Wheelwright,et al.  Metaphor and reality , 1962 .

[18]  Michel Zitt,et al.  Shadows of the Past in International Cooperation: Collaboration Profiles of the Top Five Producers of Science , 2000, Scientometrics.

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[20]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  In Search of Epistemic Networks , 1991 .

[21]  D. H. Freeman.  Statistical Decomposition Analysis , 1974 .

[22]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A sociological theory of communication: The self-organization of the knowledge-cased society. , 2001 .

[23]  B. Michelet.  L' analyse des associations , 1988 .

[24]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Similarity measures in scientometric research: The Jaccard index versus Salton's cosine formula , 1989, Inf. Process. Manag..

[25]  Ivan Bratko,et al.  Quantifying and Visualizing Attribute Interactions: An Approach Based on Entropy , 2003 .

[26]  P. Weingart,et al.  Metaphors and the dynamics of knowledge , 2002 .

[27]  Michael McGill,et al.  Introduction to Modern Information Retrieval , 1983 .

[28]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Why Words and Co-Words Cannot Map the Development of the Sciences , 1997, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[29]  Loet Leydesdorff.  Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization , 1989 .

[30]  J. Losey,et al.  Transgenic pollen harms monarch larvae , 1999, Nature.

[31]  RousseauRonald,et al.  Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2003 .

[32]  N. Luhmann.  Soziale Systeme : Grundriß einer allgemeinen Theorie , 1984 .

[33]  R. Burt,et al.  Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction , 1983 .

[34]  Joseph P. Martino,et al.  The subjective side of science : Mitroff, Ian I., Elsevier Scientific Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1974, 329 pp., $11.50 , 1976 .

[35]  Donald M. MacKay,et al.  Information, mechanism and meaning , 1969 .

[36]  Dominique Brossard,et al.  Framing Science , 2003 .

[37]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Wissenschaft Der Gesellschaft , 1992 .

[38]  Neil R. Smalheiser,et al.  Implicit Text Linkages between Medline Records: Using Arrowsmith as an Aid to Scientific Discovery , 1999, Libr. Trends.

[39]  Graeme D. Kennedy,et al.  Book Reviews: An Introduction to Corpus Linguistics , 1999, CL.

[40]  M. Callon,et al.  From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis , 1983 .

[41]  Jean Pierre Courtial,et al.  Co-word analysis as a tool for describing the network of interactions between basic and technological research: The case of polymer chemsitry , 1991, Scientometrics.

[42]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[43]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Daily time series of common single word searches in AltaVista and NorthernLight , 1998 .

[44]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Multiple presents: how search engines rewrite the past , 2006, New Media Soc..

[45]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The mutual information of university-industry-government relations: An indicator of the Triple Helix dynamics , 2003, Scientometrics.

[46]  A. Georgopoulos.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities.ByGilles Fauconnierand, Mark Turner.New York: Basic Books. $35.00. xix + 440 p; ill.; index. ISBN: 0–465–08785–X. 2002. , 2003 .

[47]  Floor Rikken.  Adverse drug reactions in a different context , 1998 .

[48]  Iina Hellsten,et al.  Focus On Metaphors: The Case Of "Frankenfood" On The Web , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[49]  Dietram A. Scheufele,et al.  Think about it This Way: Attribute Agenda-Setting Function of the Press and the public's Evaluation of a Local Issue , 2002 .

[50]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Internet time and the reliability of search engines , 2004, First Monday.

[51]  Gerald M. Kosicki,et al.  Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse , 1993 .

[52]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[53]  Ian I. Mitroff,et al.  The Subjective Side of Science , 1969 .

[54]  Adrian Mackenzie.  The Technicity of Time , 2001 .

[55]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications , 2001 .

[56]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[57]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Metaphors and Diaphors in Science Communication , 2005 .

[58]  Rafael Bailón-Moreno,et al.  Analysis of the field of physical chemistry of surfactants with the Unified Scienctometric Model. Fit of relational and activity indicators , 2005, Scientometrics.

[59]  Henk A. L. Kiers,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of adverse drug reactions in subsequent time periods using INDSCAL , 1995, Scientometrics.

[60]  Judit Bar-Ilan,et al.  Data collection methods on the Web for infometric purposes — A review and analysis , 2004, Scientometrics.

[61]  L. Brillouin,et al.  Science and information theory , 1956 .

[62]  Y. Bar-Hillel.  An Examination of Information Theory , 1955, Philosophy of Science.

[63]  Sabine Maasen,et al.  Metaphors—Messengers of Meaning , 1995 .

[64]  D. Wertz,et al.  Embryo and stem cell research in the USA: a political history. , 2002, Trends in molecular medicine.

[65]  Mike Thelwall.  The Responsiveness of Search Engine Indexes , 2001 .

[66]  R. Burt.  Toward a structural theory of action , 1982 .

[67]  Johannes Stegmann,et al.  Hypothesis generation guided by co-word clustering , 2004, Scientometrics.

[68]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Mapping the dynamics of science and technology , 1988, Scientometrics.

[69]  B. Bernstein.  Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language , 1972 .

[70]  D. Sahal,et al.  A UNIFIED THEORY OF SELF-ORGANIZATION , 1979 .

[71]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[72]  Shmuel T. Klein,et al.  Detecting Content-Bearing Words by Serial Clustering. , 1995, Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval.

[73]  Rafael Bailón-Moreno,et al.  Structure and dynamics of scientific networks. Part I: Fundamentals of the quantitative model of translation , 1999, Scientometrics.

[74]  C. A. Peursen.  Metaphor and reality , 1992 .

[75]  G. Fauconnier,et al.  The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind''s Hidden Complexities. Basic Books , 2002 .