Summary form only given. Paying for load reductions results in a market, where the amount of resources sold is less than the amount of resources bought. To resolve this imbalance, ISOs must allocate the cost of compensating demand response to those who benefit from reduced LMPs. Current cost allocation methods are based on each energy buyer's load share. In an uncongested network, this results in a “fair” allocation of costs, i.e. allocation proportional to the benefits each party accrues. However, in a congested network, this is no longer the case, as price separation occurs between nodes. In this paper, we propose a cost allocation based on LMP sensitivity that accounts for the effect of congestion. We also propose a means of allocating costs between load serving entities at a single node. Finally, we define a fairness index to evaluate the performance of the proposed method compared to load-based allocation. We find that when load reductions are small, the fairness index of the proposed method is very close to zero, indicating almost identical benefit to cost ratios for all market participants. Although the fairness index increases with increasing load reductions, even for larger load reductions, the fairness index is still lower for the proposed method.
[1]
A. Conejo,et al.
Locational marginal price sensitivities
,
2005,
IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.
[2]
Allen J. Wood,et al.
Power Generation, Operation, and Control
,
1984
.
[3]
Richard J. Pierce.
A Primer on Demand Response and a Critique of FERC Order 745
,
2011
.
[4]
D.J. Lawrence,et al.
The status of demand response in New York
,
2003,
2003 IEEE Power Engineering Society General Meeting (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37491).
[5]
Paul R. Peterson,et al.
Demand Response Potential in ISO New England's Day-Ahead Energy Market : A Report for the Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
,
2010
.