Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield

Niche complementarity is a commonly invoked mechanism underlying the positive relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem functioning, but little empirical evidence exists for complementarity among pollinator species. This study related differences in three functional traits of pollinating bees (flower height preference, daily time of flower visitation and within-flower behaviour) to the seed set of the obligate cross-pollinated pumpkin Cucurbita moschata Duch. ex Poir. across a land-use intensity gradient from tropical rainforest and agroforests to grassland in Indonesia. Bee richness and abundance changed with habitat variables and we used this natural variation to test whether complementary resource use by the diverse pollinator community enhanced final yield. We found that pollinator diversity, but not abundance, was positively related to seed set of pumpkins. Bees showed species-specific spatial and temporal variation in flower visitation traits and within-flower behaviour, allowing for classification into functional guilds. Diversity of functional groups explained even more of the variance in seed set (r2=45%) than did species richness (r2=32%) highlighting the role of functional complementarity. Even though we do not provide experimental, but rather correlative evidence, we can link spatial and temporal complementarity in highly diverse pollinator communities to pollination success in the field, leading to enhanced crop yield without any managed honeybees.

[1]  I. Hanski,et al.  Molecular-Level Variation Affects Population Growth in a Butterfly Metapopulation , 2006, PLoS biology.

[2]  A. Klein,et al.  Caveats to quantifying ecosystem services: fruit abortion blurs benefits from crop pollination. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[3]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management , 2003 .

[4]  T. Ricketts.  Tropical Forest Fragments Enhance Pollinator Activity in Nearby Coffee Crops , 2004 .

[5]  A. Klein,et al.  SPATIOTEMPORAL VARIATION IN THE DIVERSITY OF HYMENOPTERA ACROSS A TROPICAL HABITAT GRADIENT , 2005 .

[6]  A. Ives,et al.  Biodiversity as both a cause and consequence of resource availability: a study of reciprocal causality in a predator-prey system. , 2006, The Journal of animal ecology.

[7]  D. Hooper,et al.  Overyielding among plant functional groups in a long‐term experiment , 2003 .

[8]  G. Stone.  Activity patterns of females of the solitary bee Anthophora plumipes in relation to temperature, nectar supplies and body size , 1994 .

[9]  S. Potts,et al.  Pollinator diversity and crop pollination services are at risk. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[10]  Pedro Jordano,et al.  Interaction frequency as a surrogate for the total effect of animal mutualists on plants , 2005 .

[11]  P. Reich,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem stability in a decade-long grassland experiment , 2006, Nature.

[12]  S. Walters,et al.  Effects of Honey Bee Pollination on Pumpkin Fruit and Seed Yield , 2006 .

[13]  J C Stout.  Does size matter? Bumblebee behaviour and the pollination of Cytisus scoparius L. (Fabaceae) , 2000 .

[14]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[15]  A. P. Schaffers,et al.  Parallel Declines in Pollinators and Insect-Pollinated Plants in Britain and the Netherlands , 2006, Science.

[16]  A. Benedito‐Silva,et al.  Circadian Rhythms of Pollen and Nectar Collection by Bees on the Flowers of Ludwigia elegans (Onagraceae) , 1996 .

[17]  S. Lavorel,et al.  Predicting changes in community composition and ecosystem functioning from plant traits: revisiting the Holy Grail , 2002 .

[18]  A. Ives,et al.  Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference , 2004 .

[19]  S. Naeem.  DISENTANGLING THE IMPACTS OF DIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING IN COMBINATORIAL EXPERIMENTS , 2002 .

[20]  J. Gingras,et al.  Complementary Aspects of Strawberry Pollination by Honey and IndigenQus Bees (Hymenoptera) , 1993 .

[21]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California , 2004 .

[22]  G. Stone,et al.  Windows of opportunity and the temporal structuring of foraging activity in a desert solitary bee , 1999 .

[23]  J. Lepš,et al.  Effect of functional group richness and species richness in manipulated productivity–diversity studies: a glasshouse pot experiment , 2006 .

[24]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  SCALE‐DEPENDENT EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE CONTEXT ON THREE POLLINATOR GUILDS , 2002 .

[25]  P. Willmer,et al.  Temporal and microclimatic partitioning of the floral resources of Justicia aurea amongst a concourse of pollen vectors and nectar robbers , 1981, Oecologia.

[26]  G. DeGrandi-Hoffman,et al.  Effects of Honey Bee (Hymenoptera: Apidae) Foraging on Seed Set in Self-fertile Sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L) , 2006 .

[27]  Neal M. Williams,et al.  Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  P. Willmer.  Thermal constraints on activity patterns in nectar‐feeding insects , 1983 .

[29]  M. Winston,et al.  WILD BEE ABUNDANCE AND SEED PRODUCTION IN CONVENTIONAL, ORGANIC, AND GENETICALLY MODIFIED CANOLA , 2005 .

[30]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Functional diversity governs ecosystem response to nutrient enrichment , 2000, Nature.

[31]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning : synthesis and perspectives , 2002 .

[32]  S. Potts,et al.  The Role of Flower Inclination, Depth, and Height in the Preferences of a Pollinating Beetle (Coleoptera: Glaphyridae) , 2004, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[33]  Carsten Thies,et al.  REVIEWS AND SYNTHESES Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management , 2005 .

[34]  F. Chapin,et al.  EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY ON ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: A CONSENSUS OF CURRENT KNOWLEDGE , 2005 .

[35]  S. Scheu,et al.  The effects of plant diversity and insect herbivory on performance of individual plant species in experimental grassland , 2006 .

[36]  J. Fargione,et al.  Diversity decreases invasion via both sampling and complementarity effects , 2005 .

[37]  A. Klein,et al.  Importance of pollinators in changing landscapes for world crops , 2007, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[38]  V. Parra‐Tabla,et al.  Floral resource use and interactions between Apis mellifera and native bees in cucurbit crops in Yucatán, México , 2005, The Canadian Entomologist.

[39]  N. Buchmann,et al.  Resource Heterogeneity Moderates the Biodiversity-Function Relationship in Real World Ecosystems , 2008, PLoS Biology.

[40]  J. Biesmeijer,et al.  Thermal constraints for stingless bee foragers: the importance of body size and coloration , 2003, Oecologia.

[41]  Teja Tscharntke,et al.  Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[42]  P. ck.  Direct and indirect effects of herbivory: Feeding by spittlebugs affects pollinator visitation rates and seedset of Rudbeckia hirta , 2001 .

[43]  N. Williams,et al.  Extinction order and altered community structure rapidly disrupt ecosystem functioning. , 2005, Ecology letters.

[44]  T. Roulston,et al.  Farming Practices Influence Wild Pollinator Populations on Squash and Pumpkin , 2005, Journal of economic entomology.

[45]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Functional Diversity of Plant–Pollinator Interaction Webs Enhances the Persistence of Plant Communities , 2005, PLoS biology.

[46]  H. Ishii.  Floral display size influences subsequent plant choice by bumble bees , 2006 .

[47]  K. Jones,et al.  Resource Partitioning and Per-flower Foraging Efficiency in Two Bumble Bee Species , 1996 .