Litigation Risk and Auditor Resignations

Litigation against auditors has increased dramatically in recent years. Auditors can offset litigation risk in a number of ways, including improved audit quality and planning, increases in audit fees and increases in the issuance of modified opinions. Auditors can also adjust their client portfolios by becoming more selective in their choice of new clients and by withdrawing from high-risk engagements. We test the hypothesis that litigation risk motivates auditor resignations by comparing resignation companies with two groups of client companies that dismissed their auditors: one matched with the resignation companies on industry and year, and the other matched on year alone. We find resignation companies differ from dismissal companies along dimensions that capture the probability of litigation: financial distress, variance of abnormal returns, auditor independence, tenure and a modified (particularly going-concern) opinion. We also construct a litigation proxy based on a prior litigation-prediction model and find that the proxy is positively associated with the probability that the auditor will resign rather than be dismissed from the engagement. Our analysis is consistent with concerns expressed by the accounting profession that litigation pressures lead to the withdrawal of audit services for a segment of the market.

[1]  J. M. Cook,et al.  The Liability Crisis in the United States: Impact on the Accounting Profession , 1992 .

[2]  Jayanth K. Krishnan,et al.  The Role of Economic Trade-Offs in the Audit Opinion Decision: An Empirical Analysis , 1996 .

[3]  C. Frost.  Loss Contingency Reports And Stock-Prices - A Replication And Extension Of Banks And Kinney , 1991 .

[4]  M. Zmijewski.  METHODOLOGICAL ISSUES RELATED TO THE ESTIMATION OF FINANCIAL DISTRESS PREDICTION MODELS , 1984 .

[5]  James A. Ohlson.  FINANCIAL RATIOS AND THE PROBABILISTIC PREDICTION OF BANKRUPTCY , 1980 .

[6]  D. Wells.  The Market Effects of Auditor Resignations , 1993 .

[7]  Peter M. Clarkson,et al.  The association between audit quality, retained ownership, and firm-specific risk in U.S. vs. Canadian IPO markets , 1994 .

[8]  W. Johnson,et al.  The market for audit services: Evidence from voluntary auditor changes , 1990 .

[9]  William R. Kinney,et al.  Characteristics of firms correcting previously reported quarterly earnings , 1989 .

[10]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Predicting takeover targets: A methodological and empirical analysis , 1986 .

[11]  J. Krishnan,et al.  Auditor switching and conservatism , 1994 .

[12]  Joseph V. Carcello,et al.  Auditor Litigation and Modified Reporting on Bankrupt Clients , 1994 .

[13]  J. A. Siliciano.  Negligent Accounting and the Limits of Instrumental Tort Reform , 1988 .

[14]  Jerry D. Sullivan,et al.  Litigation risk broadly considered , 1992 .

[15]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  An investigation of independent audit opinions and subsequent independent auditor litigation of publicly-traded failed savings and loans , 1997 .

[16]  R. Watts,et al.  Lawsuits Against Auditors , 1994 .

[17]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Debt covenant violation and manipulation of accruals , 1994 .

[18]  Mark L. DeFond,et al.  Factors Related to Auditor-Client Disagreements over Income-Increasing Accounting Methods* , 1993 .

[19]  D. Simunic,et al.  Audit risk in a client portfolio context , 1990 .