Treated disease prevalence and spending per treated case drove most of the growth in health care spending in 1987-2009.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] B. Dean,et al. Evolution of clinical practice guidelines: evidence supporting expanded use of medicines. , 2006, Disease management : DM.
[2] C. Steiner,et al. Sensitivity of Household Reported Medical Conditions in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey , 2009, Medical care.
[3] K. Thorpe,et al. The rising prevalence of treated disease: effects on private health insurance spending. , 2005, Health affairs.
[4] Joel W. Cohen,et al. A Guide to Comparing Health Care Expenditures in the 1996 MEPS to the 1987 NMES , 2002, Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing.
[5] T. Yoshizumi,et al. Radiologic and nuclear medicine studies in the United States and worldwide: frequency, radiation dose, and comparison with other radiation sources--1950-2007. , 2009, Radiology.
[6] K. Thorpe,et al. Understanding recent increases in chronic disease treatment rates: more disease or more detection? , 2010, Health Economics, Policy and Law.
[7] M. Ekeland. Obesity, Metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease , 2014 .
[8] Amy N. Finkelstein. The Aggregate Effects of Health Insurance: Evidence from the Introduction of Medicare , 2007 .
[9] K. Thorpe. Factors accounting for the rise in health-care spending in the United States: the role of rising disease prevalence and treatment intensity. , 2006, Public health.
[10] E. Berndt,et al. The value of antihypertensive drugs: a perspective on medical innovation. , 2007, Health affairs.
[11] C. Roehrig,et al. The growth in cost per case explains far more of US health spending increases than rising disease prevalence. , 2011, Health affairs.
[12] J. Newhouse,et al. Medical care costs: how much welfare loss? , 1992, The journal of economic perspectives : a journal of the American Economic Association.
[13] S. Grundy,et al. Obesity, metabolic syndrome, and cardiovascular disease. , 2004, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.