Fine-grained provenance of users' interpretations in a collaborative visualization architecture

In this paper, we address the interpretation of seismic imaging datasets from the oil and gas industry—a process that requires expert knowledge to identify features of interest. This is a subjective process as it is based on human expertise and thus it often results in multiple views and interpretations of a feature in a collaborative environment. Managing multi-user and multi-version interpretations, combined with version tracking, is challenging; this is supported by a recent survey that we present in this paper. We address this challenge via a data-centric visualization architecture, which combines the storage of the raw data with the storage of the interpretations produced by the visualization of features by multiple user sessions. Our architecture features a fine-grained data-oriented provenance, which is not available in current methods for visual analysis of seismic data. We present case studies that present the use of our system by geoscientists to illustrate its ability to reproduce users' inputs and amendments to the interpretations of others and the ability to retrace the history of changes to a visual feature.

[1]  Etienne Robein ebook - Seismic Imaging: A Review of the Techniques, their Principles, Merits and Limitations (EET 4) , 2010 .

[2]  Masroor Rasheed,et al.  A Visualization Architecture for Collaborative Analytical and Data Provenance Activities , 2013, 2013 17th International Conference on Information Visualisation.

[3]  Jim Ching-Rong Lin,et al.  Multiple oil and gas volumetric data visualization with GPU programming , 2007, Electronic Imaging.

[4]  Yogesh L. Simmhan,et al.  A survey of data provenance in e-science , 2005, SGMD.

[5]  Kesheng Wu,et al.  FastBit: An Efficient Indexing Technology For Accelerating Data-Intensive Science , 2005 .

[6]  Ken Martin,et al.  Time Dependent Processing in a Parallel Pipeline Architecture , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  Kenneth Moreland,et al.  A Survey of Visualization Pipelines , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[8]  Shixue Zhang,et al.  Feature Aware Multiresolution Animation Models Generation , 2010, J. Multim..

[9]  Danièle Revel,et al.  BP Energy Outlook 2035 , 2015 .

[10]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  VisTrails: enabling interactive multiple-view visualizations , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[11]  Evaggelia Pitoura Query Optimization , 2009, Encyclopedia of Database Systems.

[12]  Steve Pettifer,et al.  The importance of locality in the visualization of large datasets , 2007, Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp..

[13]  Ivan Viola,et al.  Seismic volume visualization for horizon extraction , 2010, 2010 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium (PacificVis).

[14]  John Shalf,et al.  Query-driven visualization of large data sets , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[15]  Masroor Rasheed,et al.  Enabling Visualization of Massive Datasets Through MPP Database Architecture , 2011, TPCG.

[16]  A Teradata White The Teradata Scalability Story , 2009 .

[17]  Martin Styner,et al.  A digital archiving system and distributed server-side processing of large datasets , 2009, Medical Imaging.

[18]  Prabhat,et al.  FastBit: interactively searching massive data , 2009 .

[19]  Cláudio T. Silva,et al.  Querying and Creating Visualizations by Analogy , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[20]  Kenneth I. Joy,et al.  Query-Driven Visualization of Time-Varying Adaptive Mesh Refinement Data , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[21]  Markus Hadwiger,et al.  Interactive seismic interpretation with piecewise global energy minimization , 2011, 2011 IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium.

[22]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Data Lineage: A Survey , 2009 .

[23]  Michael E. Papka,et al.  Large-Scale Data Visualization Using Parallel Data Streaming , 2001, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[24]  Eduard Gröller,et al.  Knowledge-assisted visualization of seismic data , 2009, Comput. Graph..

[25]  M. Bacon,et al.  3-D Seismic Interpretation , 2003 .

[26]  Michael Stonebraker,et al.  A comparison of approaches to large-scale data analysis , 2009, SIGMOD Conference.

[27]  Judith Gurney BP Statistical Review of World Energy , 1985 .

[28]  Bernd Fröhlich,et al.  A Flexible Multi-Volume Shader Framework for Arbitrarily Intersecting Multi-Resolution Datasets , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[29]  Charles Marion,et al.  Remote visualization of large datasets with MIDAS and ParaViewWeb , 2011, Web3D '11.

[30]  Rhadamés Carmona,et al.  Octreemizer: A Hierarchical Approach for Interactive Roaming Through Very Large Volumes , 2002, VisSym.

[31]  Val Tannen,et al.  Querying data provenance , 2010, SIGMOD Conference.

[32]  Timo Ropinski,et al.  Advanced illumination techniques for GPU-based volume raycasting , 2008, SIGGRAPH 2008.

[33]  Yannis E. Ioannidis,et al.  Query optimization , 1996, CSUR.

[34]  Bruno Lévy,et al.  VolumeExplorer: roaming large volumes to couple visualization and data processing for oil and gas exploration , 2005, VIS 05. IEEE Visualization, 2005..

[35]  Valerio Pascucci,et al.  Parallel visualization on large clusters using MapReduce , 2011, 2011 IEEE Symposium on Large Data Analysis and Visualization.