Life Cycle Assessment as an environmental evaluation tool for control strategies in wastewater treatment plants

The objective of this paper is to show the potential additional insight that results from adding indicators based on Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to the evaluation criteria of plant performance in the control strategies of wastewater treatment plants. Our assessment combines plant-performance evaluation criteria as effluent quality and operational cost defined by the Benchmark Simulation Model, jointly with a detailed environmental evaluation for impact category provided by LCA. Comparison of control strategies shows that the use of ammonia and carbon controllers provides best effluent quality index, whilst the control strategy that uses ammonia, carbon and storage tank controllers has the lowest values as regards operational cost (the storage tank decrease the operational cost index into a 15%). However, environmental analysis indicates that the control strategy using ammonia, carbon and storage tank controllers generates the lowest environmental impacts in all impact categories except eutrophication; whereas the control strategy using only the carbon controller has the lowest impact on eutrophication (6% lower than the higher control strategies), but the largest impact on the remaining categories (from a 9% higher for terrestrial Ecotoxicity to a 97% higher for the Photochemical oxidation). According to the multiple evaluation criteria results, the control strategy using ammonia, carbon and storage tank controllers is considered as most suitable to implement, highlighting the importance of environmental analysis as an additional source of information for decision makers. The results reported here underline the importance of taking into account integration of the plant performance criteria with environmental evaluation based on LCA for control strategies in wastewater treatment plants.

[1]  U Jeppsson,et al.  Benchmark simulation Model no 2 in Matlab-simulink: towards plant-wide WWTP control strategy evaluation. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Xavier Flores-Alsina,et al.  Multiple-objective evaluation of wastewater treatment plant control alternatives. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[3]  N Hvala,et al.  Comparison of control strategies for nitrogen removal in an activated sludge process in terms of operating costs: a simulation study. , 2007, Water research.

[4]  X. Gabarrell,et al.  Environmental assessment of an urban water system , 2013 .

[5]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  Control PID robusto: Una visión panorámica , 2011 .

[6]  F. Castells,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Urban Wastewater Reclamation and Reuse Alternatives , 2011 .

[7]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Benchmark Simulation Model no. 1 (BSM1) , 2008 .

[8]  Maarten A. Siebel,et al.  Environmental and financial life cycle impact assessment of drinking water production at Waternet , 2008 .

[9]  I. Takács.  A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[10]  Montse Meneses,et al.  Environmental assessment of urban wastewater reuse: treatment alternatives and applications. , 2010, Chemosphere.

[11]  Antonio Visioli,et al.  Practical PID Control , 2006 .

[12]  M. T. Moreira,et al.  Environmental performance of a municipal wastewater treatment plant , 2004 .

[13]  I. Muñoz,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of urban wastewater reuse with ozonation as tertiary treatment: a focus on toxicity-related impacts. , 2009, The Science of the total environment.

[14]  Carlos Bordons,et al.  Gestión Óptima de la Energía en Microrredes con Generación Renovable , 2015 .

[15]  S. Molander,et al.  Life cycle assessment of wastewater systems : Influence of system boundaries and scale on calculated environmental loads , 2000 .

[16]  J. Penman,et al.  Good Practice Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories CH 4 Emissions from Solid Waste Disposal 419 CH 4 EMISSIONS FROM SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL , 2022 .

[17]  M. Thomsen,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of wastewater treatment in Denmark including sensitivity and uncertainty analysis , 2014 .

[18]  Hong-Gui Han,et al.  Nonlinear multiobjective model-predictive control scheme for wastewater treatment process , 2014 .

[19]  M. Meneses,et al.  Environmental analysis of Wastewater Treatment Plants Control strategies , 2012, 2012 20th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation (MED).

[20]  Ll Corominas,et al.  Life cycle assessment applied to wastewater treatment: state of the art. , 2013, Water research.

[21]  H. Siegrist,et al.  The IWA Anaerobic Digestion Model No 1 (ADM1). , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[22]  M. Pons,et al.  Influence of impact assessment methods in wastewater treatment LCA , 2008 .

[23]  María José Amores,et al.  Environmental assessment of urban water cycle on Mediterranean conditions by LCA approach , 2013 .

[24]  Jong Moon Park,et al.  Environmental impact minimization of a total wastewater treatment network system from a life cycle perspective. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[25]  D. Vrecko,et al.  Improvement of ammonia removal in activated sludge process with feedforward-feedback aeration controllers. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  PID Control in the Third Millennium , 2012 .

[27]  K. Vairavamoorthy,et al.  Towards sustainability in urban water: a life cycle analysis of the urban water system of Alexandria City, Egypt , 2010 .

[28]  S Winkler,et al.  Progress in sensor technology--progress in process control? Part 1: sensor property investigation and classification. , 2003, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[29]  P A Vanrolleghem,et al.  Towards a benchmark simulation model for plant-wide control strategy performance evaluation of WWTPs. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[30]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Life cycle assessment of processes for the treatment of wastewater urban sludge: energy and global warming analysis , 2005 .

[31]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[32]  A. Baky,et al.  Wastewater management integrated with farming –an environmental systems analysis of a Swedish country town , 2006 .

[33]  Sverker Molander,et al.  Sustainable development indicators for wastewater systems – researchers and indicator users in a co-operative case study , 2005 .

[34]  Ramon Vilanova,et al.  PID control in the Third Millennium : lessons learned and new approaches , 2012 .

[35]  M. N. Pons,et al.  Benchmark for evaluating control strategies in wastewater treatment plants , 1999, 1999 European Control Conference (ECC).

[36]  Francesc Castells,et al.  LCA as a decision support tool for the environmental improvement of the operation of a municipal wastewater treatment plant. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  Jean-Pierre Corriou,et al.  Model predictive control of wastewater treatment plants: Application to the BSM1 benchmark , 2004 .

[38]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[39]  J. B. Copp,et al.  Benchmark Simulation Model No 2: finalisation of plant layout and default control strategy. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[40]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Benchmarking of Control Strategies for Wastewater Treatment Plants , 2014 .