10-degree reverse Trendelenburg position on hemodynamic parameters and block characteristics in unilateral spinal anesthesia in below knee orthopedic surgeries – can head up position do the trick?

Unilateral spinal anesthesia (USpA) is a technique used to restrict the effect of the spinal block on the operative side. 10–15 degrees reverse Trendelenburg position has been used to control the height of the spinal block using hyperbaric drugs. We aimed to study the effect of the 10-degree reverse Trendelenburg position on the quality of block and hemodynamic stability in unilateral spinal anesthesia in this hospital-based, double-blind, randomized clinical trial. 60 patients of both sexes between 20–60 years of age, undergoing below-knee orthopedic surgeries, were randomized into 2 groups. In both groups, spinal anesthesia was given with 2 mL bupivacaine heavy (0.5%), and the lateral position was maintained for 10 mins. Group 2 patients were kept in a 10-degree reverse Trendelenburg position throughout the surgery. The hemodynamic parameters and block characteristics of the two groups were compared using Epi Info statistical software. The onset of sensory block was faster in Group 1 (recumbent) compared to Group 2 (reverse Trendelenburg). The two-segment regression time was longer in the second group. In group 2, 73.3% of patients reached a level at T8 or below T8, compared to 46.7% in Group 1. The duration of sensory block and anesthesia was longer in Group 2. We conclude that reverse Trendelenburg of 10 degrees immediately after spinal anesthesia significantly limits the level of sensory block and prolongs the duration of unilateral spinal anesthesia.

[1]  B. Awasthi,et al.  Investigating the Effect of the 10° Reverse Trendelenburg Position on Spinal Block Characteristics and Hemodynamic Parameters in Lower Limb Surgeries , 2022, Cureus.

[2]  Xue-sheng Liu,et al.  Comparison of Effects between Combined Lumbar-Sacral Plexus Block plus General Anesthesia and Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia in Elderly Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial , 2021, Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM.

[3]  J. Magar,et al.  Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia with Sequential Combined Spinal Epidural Anaesthesia for Lower Limb Orthopaedic Surgery. , 2017, Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR.

[4]  Eun Mi Kim,et al.  Head Elevation in Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia Provides Improved Hemodynamics and Appropriate Sensory Block Height at Caesarean Section , 2015, Yonsei medical journal.

[5]  M. Şahin,et al.  Is unilateral spinal anesthesia superior to bilateral spinal anesthesia in unilateral inguinal regional surgery? , 2014, Middle East journal of anaesthesiology.

[6]  L. E. Imbelloni Spinal hemianesthesia: Unilateral and posterior , 2014, Anesthesia, essays and researches.

[7]  M. Alipour,et al.  Comparison of the effects and complications of unilateral spinal anesthesia versus standard spinal anesthesia in lower-limb orthopedic surgery. , 2014, Brazilian journal of anesthesiology.

[8]  J. Wig,et al.  Evaluation of bupivacaine-clonidine combination for unilateral spinal anaesthesia in lower limb orthopedic surgery , 2008 .

[9]  C. Marchetti,et al.  A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Comparison of Unilateral Spinal Anesthesia with Hyperbaric Bupivacaine, Ropivacaine, or Levobupivacaine for Inguinal Herniorrhaphy , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[10]  U. Chohan,et al.  Haemodynamic effects of unilateral spinal anesthesia in high risk patients. , 2002, JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association.

[11]  A. Sia,et al.  The effect of 10° head‐up tilt in the right lateral position on the systemic blood pressure after subarachnoid block for Caesarean section , 2002, Anaesthesia.

[12]  L. Bertini,et al.  Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy , 2000, Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie.

[13]  A. Esmaoğlu,et al.  Unilateral spinal anaesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine , 1998, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[14]  Hinnerk F. W. Wulf,et al.  The Centennial of Spinal Anesthesia , 1998, Anesthesiology.

[15]  G. Fanelli,et al.  Block distribution and cardiovascular effects of unilateral spinal anaesthesia by 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. A clinical comparison with bilateral spinal block. , 1998, Minerva anestesiologica.

[16]  R. Caplan,et al.  Incidence and risk factors for side effects of spinal anesthesia. , 1992, Anesthesiology.

[17]  J. Racle,et al.  Spinal analgesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine: influence of age. , 1988, British journal of anaesthesia.

[18]  D P Chamberlain,et al.  Changes in the Skin Temperature of the Trunk and Their Relationship to Sympathetic Blockade during Spinal Anesthesia , 1986, Anesthesiology.

[19]  N. M. Greene AREA OF DIFFERENTIAL BLOCK IN SPINAL ANESTHESIA WITH HYPERBARIC TETRACAINE , 1958, Anesthesiology.

[20]  T. Jonnesco Remarks ON GENERAL SPINAL ANALGESIA. , 1978, British medical journal.