Area-based tests for association between spatial patterns

Abstract. Edge effects pervade natural systems, and the processes that determine spatial heterogeneity (e.g. physical, geochemical, biological, ecological factors) occur on diverse spatial scales. Hence, tests for association between spatial patterns should be unbiased by edge effects and be based on null spatial models that incorporate the spatial heterogeneity characteristic of real-world systems. This paper develops probabilistic pattern association tests that are appropriate when edge effects are present, polygon size is heterogeneous, and the number of polygons varies from one classification to another. The tests are based on the amount of overlap between polygons in each of two partitions. Unweighted and area-weighted versions of the statistics are developed and verified using scenarios representing both polygon overlap and avoidance at different spatial scales and for different distributions of polygon sizes. These statistics were applied to Soda Butte Creek, Wyoming, to determine whether stream microhabitats, such as riffles, pools and glides, can be identified remotely using high spatial resolution hyperspectral imagery. These new “spatially explicit” techniques provide information and insights that cannot be obtained from the spectral information alone.

[1]  Peter A. Rogerson Change detection thresholds for remotely sensed images , 2002, J. Geogr. Syst..

[2]  Yukio Sadahiro Exploratory Method for Analyzing Changes in Polygon Distributions , 2001 .

[3]  Daniel A. Griffith,et al.  Modeling spatial dependence in high spatial resolution hyperspectral data sets , 2002, J. Geogr. Syst..

[4]  M. Fortin,et al.  Spatial pattern and ecological analysis , 1989, Vegetatio.

[5]  Geoffrey M. Jacquez,et al.  Exposure assessment using high spatial resolution hyperspectral (HSRH) imagery , 2002, J. Geogr. Syst..

[6]  G M Jacquez,et al.  The map comparison problem: tests for the overlap of geographic boundaries. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  M. Fortin,et al.  Delineation of Ecological Boundaries: Comparison of Approaches and Significance Tests , 1995 .

[8]  Geoffrey M. Jacquez,et al.  From fields to objects: A review of geographic boundary analysis , 2000, J. Geogr. Syst..

[9]  M. Fortin Effects of data types on vegetation boundary delineation , 1997 .

[10]  Susan L. Maruca,et al.  Mapping a forest mosaic – A comparison of vegetation and bird distributions using geographic boundary analysis , 2001, Plant Ecology.

[11]  W. Andrew Marcus,et al.  Geomorphic control of persistent mine impacts in a Yellowstone Park stream and implications for the recovery of fluvial systems , 2001 .

[12]  Pierre Goovaerts,et al.  Geostatistical incorporation of spatial coordinates into supervised classification of hyperspectral data , 2002, J. Geogr. Syst..

[13]  Geoffrey M. Jacquez,et al.  Quantification of the Spatial Co-Occurrences of Ecological Boundaries , 1996 .