Mechanism of supply chain coordination cased on dynamic capability framework-the mediating role of manufacturing capabilities

Purpose: A critical issue has been absent from the conversation on supply chain coordination: how supply chain coordination influence the enterprise performance. This research proposes a new vision to research the performance mechanism of supply chain coordination capability as a dynamic capability. Manufacturing capabilities are existed as mediating role. Design/methodology/approach: Data from International Manufacturing Strategy Survey in 2009 is used to verify the mediating model by hierarchical regression analysis. Findings: The results show that supply chain coordination impacts the enterprise performance positively and indirect impacts the enterprise performance through quality, cost, flexibility. Research implications: This study presents an overview of the impact of supply chain coordination and manufacturing capabilities on enterprise performance, giving grasp for further research of the relationships that exist between them. Originality/value: This finding integrates insights from previous research in dynamic capability framework and supply chain management into a generalization and extension of the performance mechanism in manufacturing enterprises.

[1]  Bhanu S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance , 2006 .

[2]  Erwin Danneels.  Trying to become a different type of company: dynamic capability at Smith Corona , 2011 .

[3]  Chee Yew Wong,et al.  The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance , 2011 .

[4]  D. Teece.  Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance , 2007 .

[5]  Catherine L. Wang,et al.  Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda , 2007 .

[6]  C. Carter,et al.  Relationship Marketing and Supplier Logistics Performance: An Extension of the Key Mediating Variables Model , 2005 .

[7]  Luk N. Van Wassenhove,et al.  Trade-offs? What Trade-offs? Competence and Competitiveness in Manufacturing Strategy , 1993 .

[8]  Stephen M. Gilbert,et al.  New managerial challenges from supply chain opportunities , 2000 .

[9]  Arshinder,et al.  Supply chain coordination: Perspectives, empirical studies and research directions , 2008 .

[10]  Christoph Zott,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND THE EMERGENCE OF INTRAINDUSTRY DIFFERENTIAL FIRM PERFORMANCE: INSIGHTS FROM A SIMULATION STUDY , 2003 .

[11]  Janice H. Hammond,et al.  REENGINEERING CHANNEL REORDERING PROCESSES TO IMPROVE TOTAL SUPPLY‐CHAIN PERFORMANCE , 1997 .

[12]  T. Stank,et al.  BENEFITS OF INTERFIRM COORDINATION IN FOOD INDUSTRY SUPPLY CHAINS , 1999 .

[13]  Eve D. Rosenzweig,et al.  The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers , 2003 .

[14]  S. Kim.  An investigation on the direct and indirect effect of supply chain integration on firm performance , 2009 .

[15]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  Managing beyond the factory walls: Effects of four types of strategic integration on manufacturing plant performance , 2007 .

[16]  Pietro Romano,et al.  Co-ordination and integration mechanisms to manage logistics processes across supply networks , 2003 .

[17]  Chee-Chuong Sum,et al.  Business environment, operations strategy, and performance: An empirical study of Singapore manufacturers☆ , 1995 .

[18]  Gary L. Ragatz,et al.  Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty , 2002 .

[19]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[20]  S. Vickery,et al.  The effects of an integrative supply chain strategy on customer service and financial performance: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships , 2003 .

[21]  P. Ahmed,et al.  Dynamic capabilities: A review and research , 2007 .

[22]  John E. Prescott,et al.  Designing alliance networks: the influence of network position, environmental change, and strategy on firm performance , 2008 .

[23]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[24]  A. Roth,et al.  Operations as marketing: A competitive service strategy , 1991 .

[25]  T. F. Burgess,et al.  Competitive priorities, process innovations and time‐based competition in the manufacturing sectors of industrialising economies , 1998 .

[26]  C. Voss,et al.  The impact of supply chain relationship dynamics on manufacturing performance , 2005 .

[27]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  Untangling dynamic and operational capabilities: strategy for the (n)ever-changing world , 2011 .

[28]  KH Koen Heimeriks.  Developing Alliance Capabilities , 2008 .

[29]  Wang Yong.  Evolutionary Game Analysis on Co-competition Mechanism of Supply Chain , 2004 .

[30]  Togar M. Simatupang,et al.  The knowledge of coordination for supply chain integration , 2002, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[31]  John C. Narver,et al.  Does Competitive Environment Moderate the Market Orientation-Performance Relationship? , 1994 .

[32]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[33]  Carol Reeves,et al.  DEFINING QUALITY: ALTERNATIVES AND IMPLICATIONS , 1994 .

[34]  W. Bodmer.  Principles of Scientific Management , 1993, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[35]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  The dynamic resource-based view: capability lifecycles , 2003 .