Younger and older adults' rate performance when listening to synthetic speech

This study investigated adults' rate preferences when listening to synthetic speech. Twenty younger and 20 older adults listened to phonemically balanced sentences generated by MultiVoice™ (DECtalk™) and presented at randomized rates between 120 to 250 words per minute (wpm). Participants rated their listening comfort on a 7-point Likert-type scale. Analysis revealed a significant quadratic trend between comfort rating and speech rate. Most comfortable rates ranged from 150 to 200 wpm for both age groups; differences between the groups occurred at both ends of the rate continuum. The findings provide guidelines for selecting synthetic speech presentation rates when interacting with AAC users and communication partners of different ages.

[1]  D R Beukelman,et al.  Synthetic and natural speech preferences of male and female listeners in four age groups. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[2]  D B Pisoni,et al.  Segmental intelligibility of synthetic speech produced by rule. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  D S Beasley,et al.  Intelligibility of time-altered speech in relation to chronological aging. , 1977, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[4]  Robert C. Bilger,et al.  Standardization of a Test of Speech Perception in Noise , 1984 .

[5]  H. S. Venkatagiri.  Effects of rate and pitch variations on the intelligibility of synthesized speech , 1991 .

[6]  David B Pisoni,et al.  Perception of synthetic speech produced automatically by rule: Intelligibility of eight text-to-speech systems , 1986, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[7]  J. Elashoff,et al.  Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. , 1975 .

[8]  Pamela Mitchell,et al.  A comparison of the single word intelligibility of two voice output communication aids , 1989 .

[9]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  A comparison of speech synthesis intelligibility with listeners from three age groups , 1987 .

[10]  David R. Beukelman,et al.  A comparison of intelligibility among natural speech and seven speech synthesizers with listeners from three age groups , 1990 .

[11]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Passage difficulty, speech rate, and age differences in memory for spoken text: speech recall and the complexity hypothesis. , 1993, Experimental aging research.

[12]  Richard A. Stevick,et al.  Response Differences and Preferences for All-Category-Defined and End-Defined Likert Formats , 1984 .

[13]  J Reichle,et al.  The intelligibility of synthesized speech: ECHO II versus VOTRAX. , 1987, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Rapid speech processing and divided attention: processing rate versus processing resources as an explanation of age effects. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[15]  L E Humes,et al.  Recognition of synthetic speech by hearing-impaired elderly listeners. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[16]  C. Eisdorfer,et al.  Auditory Changes in the Aged: A Follow‐Up Study * , 1972, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[17]  Howard G. Schutz,et al.  A Comparison of Variable Configurations Across Scale Lengths: An Empirical Study' , 1975 .

[19]  D. Pisoni,et al.  Effects of age on serial recall of natural and synthetic speech. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[20]  N J Lass,et al.  A comparative study of listening rate preferences for oral reading and impromptu speaking tasks. , 1973, The Journal of communication.

[21]  S. Gordon-Salant,et al.  Temporal factors and speech recognition performance in young and elderly listeners. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.