A structural equation analysis of the QSL relationship with passenger riding experience on high speed rail: An empirical study of Taiwan and Korea

Taiwan High Speed Rail (THSR) began operations in early 2007 after nearly three decades spent initiating project, planning and acquiring land, creating detailed designs and undergoing civil construction. Currently, the franchised corporation operates trains at a top speed of 300km/h when running from north to south in Taiwan. Service Quality, customer Satisfaction, and Loyalty (QSL) continue to be the critical factors that influence long-term operation, growth, and profits of service-oriented transportation systems. In this article, a structural equation model (SEM) is first proposed and then respecified in order to measure the impact of mediating variables in the passenger continuance behavior on the QSL chain with high speed rail (HSR) service. Furthermore, a cross-country comparison of the actual riding experience on the THSR and Korea Train eXpress (KTX) was demonstrated by analyzing different groups of respondents. The empirical study verified that the QSL relationship is influenced by the introduction of mediating variables, such as corporate image and passenger complaints, into the HSR service industry. This analysis provides an evidential basis with the evaluating indicators so that the management team can deploy an effective marketing strategy, achieve continuous quality improvement, and efficiently manage customer relationships to ensure passengers' future commitment and confidence in the HSR systems.

[1]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  AN ASSESSMENT OF THE USE OF STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH , 2004 .

[2]  T. Laosirihongthong,et al.  Innovations in Service Strategy: An Evaluation of Quality in Airline Service Operations by Using SERVQUAL Model , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology.

[3]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[4]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  An Investigation into the Determinants of Customer Satisfaction , 1982 .

[5]  R. Kline Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[6]  Jin-Woo Park,et al.  Modelling the Impact of Airline Service Quality and Marketing Variables on Passengers’ Future Behavioural Intentions , 2006 .

[7]  Lawrence W. Lan,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling to Determine Passenger Loyalty toward Intercity Bus Services , 2005 .

[8]  Salvador Namur,et al.  Using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) for the Study of Impurity Profiles of Drug Substances , 2006 .

[9]  Steven B. Kempton,et al.  Transportation and Communications , 2000 .

[10]  R. Oliver Satisfaction: A Behavioral Perspective On The Consumer , 1996 .

[11]  Jan Johansson Hanse,et al.  Job characteristics, motivators and stress among information technology consultants: A structural equation modeling approach , 2007 .

[12]  C. Grönroos A Service Quality Model and its Marketing Implications , 1984 .

[13]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[14]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[15]  Thomas F. Golob,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling For Travel Behavior Research , 2001 .

[16]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[17]  Wen-Bao Lin,et al.  An empirical of service quality model from the viewpoint of management , 2007, Expert Syst. Appl..

[18]  Richard L. Oliver,et al.  An Investigation of the Interrelationship Between Consumer (Dis)Satisfaction and Complaint Reports , 1987 .

[19]  Dennis M. Hussey,et al.  Using structural equation modeling to test environmental performance in small and medium-sized manufacturers: can SEM help SMEs? , 2007 .

[20]  J. Hair Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[21]  P. Mokhtarian,et al.  Do changes in neighborhood characteristics lead to changes in travel behavior? A structural equations modeling approach , 2007 .

[22]  Sheng-Hsun Hsu,et al.  Application of customer satisfaction study to derive customer knowledge , 2006 .

[23]  E. Anderson,et al.  The Antecedents and Consequences of Customer Satisfaction for Firms , 1993 .

[24]  Michael T. Brannick,et al.  Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling , 1995 .

[25]  A. Palma,et al.  The impact of adverse weather conditions on the propensity to change travel decisions: A survey of Brussels commuters , 1997 .

[26]  Jin-Hyuk Chung,et al.  Weekend Activity and Travel Behavior in a Developing Country: Empirical Study Using Multilevel Structural Equation Models , 2004 .

[27]  P. Zhao,et al.  Constructing quality-satisfaction-loyalty chain system: an empirical study of insurance industry in China , 2005, Proceedings of ICSSSM '05. 2005 International Conference on Services Systems and Services Management, 2005..

[28]  C. Fornell,et al.  Foundations of the American Customer Satisfaction Index , 2000 .

[29]  Michael A Johnson ATTRIBUTE IMPORTANCE IN MULTIATTRIBUTE TRANSPORTATION DECISIONS , 1978 .

[30]  C. Fornell,et al.  The American Customer Satisfaction Index: Nature, Purpose, and Findings , 1996 .

[31]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. , 1988 .

[32]  Maria Johansson,et al.  The effects of attitudes and personality traits on mode choice , 2006 .

[33]  S. O. Olsen Comparative evaluation and the relationship between quality, satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty , 2002 .

[34]  So Young Sohn,et al.  Structural equation model for effective CRM of digital content industry , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[35]  David M. Szymanski,et al.  Customer satisfaction: A meta-analysis of the empirical evidence , 2001 .

[36]  Michael R Couture,et al.  ANALYZING TRAVELER ATTITUDES TO RESOLVE INTENDED AND ACTUAL USE OF A NEW TRANSIT SERVICE , 1981 .

[37]  Peter O. Barnard,et al.  THE ROLE OF STATED PREFERENCE METHODS IN STUDIES OF TRAVEL CHOICE , 1987 .