Fair Scheduling in Cellular Systems in the Presence of Noncooperative Mobiles

We consider the problem of centrally controlled 'fair' scheduling of resources to one of the many mobile stations connected to a base station (BS). The BS is the only entity making decisions in this framework based on truthful information from the mobiles on their radio channel. We study the well-known family of parametric α-fair scheduling problems from a game-theoretic perspective in which some of the mobiles may be noncooperative. We first show that if the BS is unaware of the noncooperative behavior from the mobiles, the noncooperative mobiles become successful in snatching the resources from the other cooperative mobiles, resulting in unfair allocations. If the BS is aware of the noncooperative mobiles, a new game arises with BS as an additional player. It can then do better by neglecting the signals from the noncooperative mobiles. The BS, however, becomes successful in eliciting the truthful signals from the mobiles only when it uses additional information (signal statistics). This new policy along with the truthful signals from mobiles forms a Nash Equilibrium (NE) called a Truth Revealing Equilibrium. Finally, we propose new iterative algorithms to implement fair scheduling policies that robustify the otherwise non-robust (in presence of noncooperation) α-fair scheduling algorithms.

[1]  J. Goodman Note on Existence and Uniqueness of Equilibrium Points for Concave N-Person Games , 1965 .

[2]  Pierre Priouret,et al.  Adaptive Algorithms and Stochastic Approximations , 1990, Applications of Mathematics.

[3]  Alexander L. Stolyar,et al.  On the Asymptotic Optimality of the Gradient Scheduling Algorithm for Multiuser Throughput Allocation , 2005, Oper. Res..

[4]  Ness B. Shroff,et al.  A framework for opportunistic scheduling in wireless networks , 2003, Comput. Networks.

[5]  Vincent K. N. Lau,et al.  Proportional fair space-time scheduling for wireless communications , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[6]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Generalized Nash Bargaining Solution for bandwidth allocation , 2006, Comput. Networks.

[7]  Alexander L. Stolyar,et al.  Scheduling algorithms for a mixture of real-time and non-real-time data in HDR , 2001 .

[8]  Philip A. Whiting,et al.  SCHEDULING IN A QUEUING SYSTEM WITH ASYNCHRONOUSLY VARYING SERVICE RATES , 2004, Probability in the Engineering and Informational Sciences.

[9]  Matthew S. Grob,et al.  CDMA/HDR: a bandwidth-efficient high-speed wireless data service for nomadic users , 2000, IEEE Commun. Mag..

[10]  Philip A. Whiting,et al.  Convergence of proportional-fair sharing algorithms under general conditions , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[11]  Elias A. Rachid,et al.  Opportunistic scheduling in cellular systems in the presence of non-cooperative mobiles , 2009, CDC 2009.

[12]  R. Aumann Subjectivity and Correlation in Randomized Strategies , 1974 .

[13]  Sem C. Borst,et al.  Dynamic rate control algorithms for HDR throughput optimization , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[14]  Richard J. La,et al.  Class and channel condition based weighted proportional fair scheduler , 2001 .

[15]  Jean C. Walrand,et al.  Fair end-to-end window-based congestion control , 2000, TNET.

[16]  Eitan Altman,et al.  Fair power and transmission rate control in wireless networks , 2002, Global Telecommunications Conference, 2002. GLOBECOM '02. IEEE.