Testing for nonlinearity in European climatic time series by the method of surrogate data

SummaryUsing temperature and pressure records from Czech meteorological stations and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis series, we tested for the presence of detectable nonlinearity in univariate and multivariate climatic time series. The method of surrogate data was utilized for nonlinearity detection – results of nonlinear prediction for the original series were compared to the results for series whose nonlinear structure was randomized. The prediction was done by means of local linear models in the reconstructed phase space. None or very weak nonlinearity was found in the single (univariate) series, and pressure series generally exhibited stronger nonlinearity than series of temperature (daily mean, minimum or maximum). Distinct nonlinearity was found in all tested multivariate systems, especially when both temperatures and pressures were used simultaneously to form the phase space. Nonlinearity tests were carried out for 30-year and 10-year-long datasets and nonlinear behavior was generally more apparent in the longer versions. In addition, the tested systems showed more substantial nonlinearity when the success of short-range prediction was used as the discriminating statistic; with an increase of the prediction time, detectable nonlinearity became weaker and it disappeared completely for long-term prediction.

[1]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[2]  Bellie Sivakumar,et al.  Chaos theory in geophysics: past, present and future , 2004 .

[3]  Holger Kantz,et al.  Practical implementation of nonlinear time series methods: The TISEAN package. , 1998, Chaos.

[4]  Thomas Schreiber,et al.  Constrained Randomization of Time Series Data , 1998, chao-dyn/9909042.

[5]  H. Kantz,et al.  Nonlinear time series analysis , 1997 .

[6]  George Sugihara,et al.  Nonlinear forecasting as a way of distinguishing chaos from measurement error in time series , 1990, Nature.

[7]  Andreas Galka,et al.  Topics in Nonlinear Time Series Analysis, with Implications for Eeg Analysis , 2000 .

[8]  Henry D. I. Abarbanel,et al.  Analysis of Observed Chaotic Data , 1995 .

[9]  D. Kugiumtzis,et al.  Test your surrogate data before you test for nonlinearity. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[10]  C. Nicolis,et al.  Global properties and local structure of the weather attractor over Western Europe , 1989 .

[11]  Martin Casdagli,et al.  Nonlinear prediction of chaotic time series , 1989 .

[12]  James Theiler,et al.  Testing for nonlinearity in time series: the method of surrogate data , 1992 .

[13]  Schreiber,et al.  Improved Surrogate Data for Nonlinearity Tests. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[14]  Anastasios A. Tsonis,et al.  Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics c○European Geophysical Society 2001 , 1999 .

[15]  D. T. Kaplan,et al.  Nonlinear dynamics and time series : building a bridge between the natural and statistical sciences , 2006 .

[16]  F. Takens.  Detecting strange attractors in turbulence , 1981 .

[17]  Milan Paluš,et al.  Testing for Nonlinearity in Weather Records , 1994 .

[18]  T. Schreiber,et al.  Surrogate time series , 1999, chao-dyn/9909037.

[19]  M. Paluš.  Detecting Nonlinearity in Multivariate Time Series , 1996 .

[20]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Geometry from a Time Series , 1980 .

[21]  Farmer,et al.  Predicting chaotic time series. , 1987, Physical review letters.

[22]  W. Collins,et al.  The NCEP–NCAR 50-Year Reanalysis: Monthly Means CD-ROM and Documentation , 2001 .