Inertial sensor motion analysis of gait, sit–stand transfers and step-up transfers: differentiating knee patients from healthy controls

Patients undergoing total knee replacement for end stage knee osteoarthritis (OA) become increasingly younger and more demanding. Consequently, outcome assessment tools need to evolve toward objective performance-based measures. We applied a novel approach toward ambulatory biomechanical assessment of physical function using a single inertial sensor located at the pelvis to derive various motion parameters during activities of daily living. We investigated the potential of a clinically feasible battery of tests to define relevant parameters of physical function. We compared preoperative measures of end stage knee OA patients to healthy subjects. Our results show that measures of time yield the highest discriminative capacity to differentiate between groups. Additionally we found disease-dependent and task-specific alterations of movement for inertial sensor-derived motion parameters with good discriminative capacity. The inertial sensor's output quantities seem to capture another clinically relevant dimension of physical function that is supplementary to time. This study demonstrates the potential of inertial sensor-based motion analysis and provides a standardized test feasible for a routine clinical application in the longitudinal follow-up.

[1]  Rachel Senden,et al.  The importance to including objective functional outcomes in the clinical follow up of total knee arthroplasty patients. , 2011, The Knee.

[2]  K. Bennell,et al.  Hip flexion range of motion and physical function in hip osteoarthritis: mediating effects of hip extensor strength and pain. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[3]  Bart Jansen,et al.  Reliability and clinical correlates of 3D-accelerometry based gait analysis outcomes according to age and fall-risk. , 2011, Gait & posture.

[4]  R. V. van Lummel,et al.  The accuracy of measuring the kinematics of rising from a chair with accelerometers and gyroscopes. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  Heribert Baldus,et al.  A body-fixed-sensor-based analysis of power during sit-to-stand movements. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[6]  K. Meijer,et al.  Acceleration-based gait test for healthy subjects: reliability and reference data. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[7]  C. Terwee,et al.  Self-reported physical functioning was more influenced by pain than performance-based physical functioning in knee-osteoarthritis patients. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[8]  Tomokazu Nakamura,et al.  Analysis of pelvic movement in the elderly during walking using a posture monitoring system equipped with a triaxial accelerometer and a gyroscope. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Wiebren Zijlstra,et al.  Compensatory Trunk Movements in Patients with Hip Osteoarthritis: Accuracy and Reproducibility of a Body‐Fixed Sensor‐Based Assessment , 2011, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[10]  Daniele Giansanti,et al.  Does centripetal acceleration affect trunk flexion monitoring by means of accelerometers? , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[11]  Rafael C González,et al.  Real-time gait event detection for normal subjects from lower trunk accelerations. , 2010, Gait & posture.

[12]  J. Kellgren,et al.  Radiological Assessment of Osteo-Arthrosis , 1957, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[13]  L B Mokkink,et al.  Performance-based methods for measuring the physical function of patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. , 2006, Rheumatology.

[14]  Kenton R Kaufman,et al.  Sit-to-stand 3 months after unilateral total knee arthroplasty: comparison of self-selected and constrained conditions. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[15]  M. Schenkman,et al.  Comparison of Self‐Reported Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score to Performance Measures in Patients After Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2011, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[16]  Laure Gossec,et al.  Gait analysis as a quantifiable outcome measure in hip or knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review. , 2010, Joint, bone, spine : revue du rhumatisme.

[17]  Nico Verdonschot,et al.  Sit-to-Stand Movement as a Performance-Based Measure for Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[18]  H. Menz,et al.  Knee kinematics during walking at different speeds in people who have undergone total knee replacement. , 2010, The Knee.

[19]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  A body-fixed-sensor based analysis of compensatory trunk movements during unconstrained walking. , 2008, Gait & posture.

[20]  S. Toksvig-Larsen,et al.  Knee arthroplasty: are patients' expectations fulfilled? , 2009, Acta orthopaedica.

[21]  K. Kerr,et al.  Analysis of the sit-stand-sit movement cycle in normal subjects. , 1997, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  Wai-Yin Wong,et al.  Trunk posture monitoring with inertial sensors , 2008, European Spine Journal.

[23]  Idsart Kingma,et al.  Optimal inertial sensor location for ambulatory measurement of trunk inclination. , 2009, Journal of biomechanics.

[24]  N. Kampanis,et al.  Gait variability measurements in lumbar spinal stenosis patients: part A. Comparison with healthy subjects , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[25]  Functional evaluation of the TKA patient using the coordination and variability of rising. , 2007, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[26]  Wim G. M. Janssen,et al.  Determinants of the sit-to-stand movement: a review. , 2002, Physical therapy.

[27]  R. C. Lummel,et al.  Measuring functional abilities of patients with knee problems: rationale and construction of the DynaPort knee test , 2002, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[28]  Daniele Giansanti,et al.  Physiological motion monitoring: a wearable device and adaptative algorithm for sit-to-stand timing detection. , 2006, Physiological measurement.

[29]  W. Zijlstra,et al.  Predictive Value of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index for the Amount of Physical Activity After Total Hip Arthroplasty , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[30]  J A Swets,et al.  Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. , 1988, Science.

[31]  Lynn Snyder-Mackler,et al.  Persistence of Altered Movement Patterns During a Sit-to-Stand Task 1 Year Following Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2008, Physical Therapy.

[32]  Sara R Piva,et al.  Interrater reliability and validity of the stair ascend/descend test in subjects with total knee arthroplasty. , 2010, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  D S Childress,et al.  A preliminary investigation of pelvic obliquity patterns during gait in persons with transtibial and transfemoral amputation. , 2000, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.