Priming by NUMB3R5 does not involve top-down feedback.

Using the same-different task, Perea, Duñabeitia, Pollatsek, and Carreiras (2009) showed that digits resembling letters ("leet digits"; e.g., 1 = I, 4 = A) primed pseudoword strings (e.g., V35Z3D-VESZED), but letters resembling digits ("leet letters") did not prime digit strings (e.g., 9ES7E2-935732), and suggested that this is due to top-down feedback available for letter, but not digit, strings. Here we show that (a) single letters show as much leet priming as 3-letter words (Experiment 1); (b) leet priming is equally robust for digit strings and pseudowords when the string is 4 items long but not when 6 items long (Experiment 2); and (c) with 6-item strings, orthotactically illegal letter strings (e.g., OIAUEQ) behave just like digit strings (Experiment 3). These results indicate that the asymmetry in leet priming is not due to top-down feedback available selectively for letter strings. We offer an alternative explanation based on the Bayesian reader account of masked priming proposed by Norris and Kinoshita (2008), and the role played by the orthotactic knowledge used to extend the functional capacity of visual working memory involved in performing the same-different task.

[1]  J B Poline,et al.  Letter Binding and Invariant Recognition of Masked Words , 2004, Psychological science.

[2]  Dennis Norris,et al.  The Bayesian reader: explaining word recognition as an optimal Bayesian decision process. , 2006, Psychological review.

[3]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[4]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Visual word processing and experiential origins of functional selectivity in human extrastriate cortex , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  Letter position information and printed word perception: the relative-position priming constraint. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[7]  M. Farah,et al.  Neural Specialization for Letter Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Transposed-letter priming of prelexical orthographic representations. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Dennis Norris,et al.  Perception as evidence accumulation and Bayesian inference: insights from masked priming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  H. Kucera,et al.  Computational analysis of present-day American English , 1967 .

[11]  A. Caramazza,et al.  The structure of graphemic representations , 1990, Cognition.