Nimodipine treatment in poor-grade aneurysm patients. Results of a multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

A multicenter, randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial of nimodipine in poor-grade aneurysm patients was carried out in 17 Canadian hospitals. Of 188 patients enrolled in the trial, 32 were excluded for protocol violations and two were excluded due to statistical considerations, leaving 154 patients for valid outcome analysis. Nimodipine treatment was associated with a significantly better outcome (p less than 0.001): 21 (29.2%) of 72 nimodipine-treated patients had a good outcome at 3 months after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) compared to eight (9.8%) of 82 placebo-treated patients. Delayed ischemic deficits from vasospasm alone were significantly less frequent in the nimodipine group (p less than 0.05) with permanent deficits occurring in five nimodipine-treated patients (6.9%) and in 22 placebo-treated patients (26.8%). Improvement in the good outcome rate and reduction in delayed ischemic deficits from vasospasm alone occurred in both Grade 3 and 4 patients, with no difference between nimodipine- and placebo-treated patients being found in Grade 5 patients. Repeat angiography after Day 4 was carried out in 124 patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of moderate or severe diffuse spasm, which was seen in 64.3% of nimodipine-treated patients and 66.2% of placebo-treated patients. The authors conclude that nimodipine treatment in poor-grade patients with SAH results in an increase in the number of good outcomes and a reduction in the incidence of delayed neurological deterioration due to vasospasm. This effect occurs by a mechanism other than prevention of large-vessel spasm as visualized on angiography.

[1]  R. Wilkins Attempts at Prevention or Treatment of Intracranial Arterial Spasm: An Update , 1986, Neurosurgery.

[2]  D. Cook,et al.  Nimodipine and chronic vasospasm in monkeys: Part 1. Clinical and radiological findings. , 1985, Neurosurgery.

[3]  L. Brandt,et al.  Outcome in 60 consecutive patients treated with early aneurysm operation and intravenous nimodipine. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  G D Murray,et al.  Antifibrinolytic treatment in subarachnoid hemorrhage. , 1984, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  J. A. Grotenhuis,et al.  Intracarotid slow bolus injection of nimodipine during angiography for treatment of cerebral vasospasm after SAH. A preliminary report. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[6]  H. Adams,et al.  Antifibrinolytic therapy in the acute period following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Preliminary observations from the Cooperative Aneurysm Study. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  B. Weir,et al.  A randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial of nimodipine after SAH in monkeys. Part 1: Clinical and radiological findings. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[8]  G. Ferguson,et al.  Intraventricular hemorrhage from ruptured aneurysm. Retrospective analysis of 91 cases. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.

[9]  C. R. Ingram,et al.  Cerebral arterial spasm--a controlled trial of nimodipine in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage. , 1983, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  L. Auer,et al.  Human pial vascular reactions to intravenous Nimodipine-infusion during EC-IC bypass surgery. , 1983, Stroke.

[11]  E. Mackenzie,et al.  Effects of nifedipine of pial arteriolar calibre: an in vivo study. , 1979, Surgical neurology.

[12]  G. Allen,et al.  Cerebral arterial spasm: part 10. Reversal of acute and chronic spasm in dogs with orally administered nifedipine. , 1979, Neurosurgery.

[13]  B. Weir,et al.  Time course of vasospasm in man. , 1978, Journal of neurosurgery.

[14]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[15]  W. Hunt,et al.  Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. , 1968, Journal of neurosurgery.