Hand-held virtual reality: a feasibility study

Hand-held computing devices are ubiquitous and have become part of our lives these days. Moreover, hand-held devices are also increasingly being equipped with special sensors and non-traditional displays. As such, it raises the question of whether such a "small" and "reduced" device could serve as an effective virtual reality (VR) platform and provide sufficient immersion and presence, e.g. through multimodal interaction. In this paper, we address this question by comparing the perceived field of view (FOV) and level of immersion and presence among the users' of VR platforms, varied in the sizes of physical/software FOV and in styles of interaction. In particular, we consider a motion based interaction, a style of interaction uniquely suitable for the "hand-held" devices. Our experimental study has revealed that when a motion based interaction was used, the FOV perceived by the user for the small hand held device was significantly greater than (around 50%) the actual. Other displays using the button or mouse/keyboard interface did not exhibit such a phenomenon. In addition, the level of user felt presence was higher than even that from a large projection based VR platform. The paper demonstrates the distinct possibility of realizing reasonable virtual reality even with devices with a small visual field of view and limited processing power.

[1]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Perception (Handbook of perception and action, Vol. 1) , 1995 .

[2]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Towards Massively Multi-user Augmented Reality on Handheld Devices , 2005, Pervasive.

[3]  Mel Slater,et al.  A note on presence terminology , 2003 .

[4]  Michael J. Singer,et al.  Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire , 1998, Presence.

[5]  Gerard Jounghyun Kim,et al.  Increasing the effective egocentric field of view with proprioceptive and tactile feedback , 2004, IEEE Virtual Reality 2004.

[6]  K. Koyamada,et al.  PDA-based Visualization Control and Annotation Interface for Virtual Environment , 2003 .

[7]  Manolis I. A. Lourakis,et al.  Efficient, causal camera tracking in unprepared environments , 2005, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[8]  Jun Rekimoto,et al.  TouchEngine: a tactile display for handheld devices , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[9]  Volker Paelke,et al.  Foot-based mobile interaction with games , 2004, ACE '04.

[10]  Rudolph P. Darken,et al.  A Handheld Computer as an Interaction Device to a Virtual Environment , 1999 .

[11]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Good features to track , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[12]  Paul Anderson,et al.  Gesture-recognition with Non-referenced Tracking , 2006, 3D User Interfaces (3DUI'06).

[13]  Shumin Zhai,et al.  Virtual reality for palmtop computers , 1993, TOIS.

[14]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  First steps towards handheld augmented reality , 2003, Seventh IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, 2003. Proceedings..

[15]  Yoshifumi Kitamura,et al.  3D Interaction With and From Handheld Computers , 2004 .

[16]  Michael Rohs,et al.  Sweep and point and shoot: phonecam-based interactions for large public displays , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[17]  J.-Y. Bouguet,et al.  Pyramidal implementation of the lucas kanade feature tracker , 1999 .

[18]  Mel Slater,et al.  Measuring Presence: A Response to the Witmer and Singer Presence Questionnaire , 1999, Presence.

[19]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  Effects of information layout, screen size, and field of view on user performance in information‐rich virtual environments , 2005, VRST '05.

[20]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  A Survey of Usability Evaluation in Virtual Environments: Classification and Comparison of Methods , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[21]  Henry Been-Lirn Duh,et al.  Effects of field of view on presence, enjoyment, memory, and simulator sickness in a virtual environment , 2002, Proceedings IEEE Virtual Reality 2002.

[22]  Doug A. Bowman,et al.  An evaluation of techniques for grabbing and manipulating remote objects in immersive virtual environments , 1997, SI3D.

[23]  Mel Slater,et al.  The Influence of Body Movement on Subjective Presence in Virtual Environments , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[24]  Sungkil Lee,et al.  Formation of Spatial Presence: By Form or Content? , 2004 .

[25]  Joachim Pouderoux,et al.  A camera-based interface for interaction with mobile handheld computers , 2005, I3D '05.