Role of network structure and network effects in diffusion of innovations

Abstract Why does diffusion of innovation sometimes propagate throughout the whole population, and why at other times does it halt in its interim process? The current paper provides a potential answer to this question by developing a simple computational model of social networks. The proposed computational approach incorporating small-world graphs enables the authors to find that diffusion of innovation is more likely to fail in a random network than in a highly clustered network of consumers. A marketing implication is that the choice of initial target groups and their network structures matter in influencing whether an innovation makes full or partial penetration, in markets where network effects plays a role.

[1]  G. Lilien,et al.  Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Yikuan Lee,et al.  New product launch strategy for network effects products , 2003 .

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers , 1974 .

[4]  Mark Buchanan,et al.  Nexus: Small Worlds and the Groundbreaking Science of Networks , 2002 .

[5]  Reka Albert,et al.  Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks , 1999 .

[6]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Epidemic spreading in scale-free networks. , 2000, Physical review letters.

[7]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  New Products, Upgrades, and New Releases: A Rationale for Sequential Product Introduction , 1997 .

[8]  Duncan J. Watts,et al.  Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks , 1998, Nature.

[9]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[10]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Linked: The New Science of Networks , 2002 .

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  P. Geroski Models of technology diffusion , 2000 .

[13]  Baohong Sun,et al.  Product Strategy for Innovators in Markets with Network Effects , 2004 .

[14]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[15]  H E Stanley,et al.  Classes of small-world networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  David F. Midgley,et al.  Opinion Leadership Amongst Leading Edge Users , 2000 .

[17]  Jongseok Lee,et al.  Reconsideration of the Winner-Take-All Hypothesis: Complex Networks and Local Bias , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[18]  S. Godin,et al.  Unleashing the Ideavirus , 2000 .

[19]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Installed base and compatibility : innovation, product preannouncements and predation , 1986 .

[20]  A. McGahan Bandwagon Effects in High Technology Industries , 2001 .

[21]  Susan J. Winter,et al.  Electronic Word-of-Mouth in Online Environments , 2006 .

[22]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Talk of the Network: A Complex Systems Look at the Underlying Process of Word-of-Mouth , 2001 .

[23]  Sidney Redner Networking comes of age , 2002, Nature.

[24]  Robin Cowan,et al.  Technological standards with local externalities and decentralized behaviour , 1998 .

[25]  Neil Gandal,et al.  Complementary network externalities and technological adoption , 1993 .

[26]  Vijay Mahajan,et al.  New Product Diffusion Models in Marketing: A Review and Directions for Research: , 1990 .

[27]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation , 1985 .

[28]  J. Pae,et al.  The impact of technology advancement strategies on consumers' patronage decisions , 2002 .

[29]  Detlef Schoder,et al.  Forecasting the success of telecommunication services in the presence of network effects , 2000, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[30]  Geoffrey A. Moore,et al.  Crossing the Chasm , 1991 .

[31]  David F. Midgley,et al.  The effect of network structure in industrial diffusion processes , 1992 .

[32]  Jeffrey H. Rohlfs A theory of interdependent demand for a communications service , 1974 .

[33]  Gary L. Lilien,et al.  First in, First out? The Effects of Network Externalities on Pioneer Survival , 2004 .

[34]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[35]  Dale A. Stirling,et al.  Information rules , 2003, SGMD.

[36]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities , 1986, Journal of Political Economy.

[37]  Marvin A. Sirbu,et al.  Price Competition and Compatibility in the Presence of Positive Demand Externalities , 1995 .

[38]  A-L Barabási,et al.  Structure and tie strengths in mobile communication networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[39]  Lori Rosenkopf,et al.  Social Network Effects on the Extent of Innovation Diffusion: A Computer Simulation , 1997 .

[40]  E. Rogers,et al.  The diffusion of interactive communication innovations and the critical mass: the adoption of telecommunications services by German banks , 1999 .

[41]  W. Arthur,et al.  INCREASING RETURNS AND LOCK-IN BY HISTORICAL EVENTS , 1989 .

[42]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  From Density to Destiny: Using Spatial Dimension of Sales Data for Early Prediction of New Product Success , 2004 .

[43]  S. Oren,et al.  Optimal Dynamic Pricing For Expanding Networks , 1985 .

[44]  Amar Bhidé Momenta Corporation (A) , 2002 .

[45]  Gesine Reinert,et al.  Small worlds , 2001, Random Struct. Algorithms.

[46]  Xiaotong Li Cheap Talk and Bogus Network Externalities in the Emerging Technology Market , 2005 .

[47]  Elihu Katz,et al.  The Social Itinerary of Technical Change: Two Studies on the Diffusion of Innovation , 1961 .

[48]  Emanuel Rosen,et al.  The Anatomy of Buzz: How to Create Word of Mouth Marketing , 2000 .