The Frequency and Degree of Cosuppression by Sense Chalcone Synthase Transgenes Are Dependent on Transgene Promoter Strength and Are Reduced by Premature Nonsense Codons in the Transgene Coding Sequence.

By comparing the effects of strong and weak promoters that drive sense chalcone synthase (Chs) transgenes in large populations of independently transformed plants, we show here that a strong transgene promoter is required for high-frequency cosuppression of Chs genes and for production of the full range of cosuppression phenotypes. In addition, sense Chs transgenes driven by a cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter possessing a single copy of the upstream activator region (UAR) were found to produce a significantly lower degree of cosuppression than they did when the transgene promoter possessed two or four copies of the UAR. It has been shown elsewhere that 35S promoter strength increases with increasing UAR copy number. Frameshift mutations producing early nonsense codons in the Chs transgene were found to reduce the frequency and the degree of cosuppression. These results suggest that promoter strength and transcript stability determine the degree of cosuppression, supporting the hypothesis that sense cosuppression is a response to the accumulation of transcripts at high concentrations. This conclusion was shown to apply to single-copy transgenes but not necessarily to inversely repeated transgenes. The results presented here also have significance for efficient engineering of cosuppression phenotypes for use in research and agriculture.

[1]  J. Ross,et al.  Control of messenger RNA stability in higher eukaryotes. , 1996, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[2]  H. Stunnenberg,et al.  Improved method for PCR-mediated site-directed mutagenesis. , 1994, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  J. Mol,et al.  Transgene‐mediated suppression of chalcone synthase expression in Petunia hybrida results from an increase in RNA turnover , 1994 .

[4]  T. Sijen,et al.  RNA-Mediated Virus Resistance: Role of Repeated Transgenes and Delineation of Targeted Regions. , 1996, The Plant cell.

[5]  C. Napoli,et al.  Introduction of a Chimeric Chalcone Synthase Gene into Petunia Results in Reversible Co-Suppression of Homologous Genes in trans. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[6]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[7]  J. Mol,et al.  The TACPyAT repeats in the chalcone synthase promoter of Petunia hybrida act as a dominant negative cis-acting module in the control of organ-specific expression. , 1992, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[8]  W. Dougherty,et al.  Induction of a Highly Specific Antiviral State in Transgenic Plants: Implications for Regulation of Gene Expression and Virus Resistance. , 1993, The Plant cell.

[9]  P. A. Jennings,et al.  Inhibition of gene expression by a short sense fragment. , 1991, Nucleic acids research.

[10]  G. Schröder,et al.  The role of cysteines in polyketide synthases. Site-directed mutagenesis of resveratrol and chalcone synthases, two key enzymes in different plant-specific pathways. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[11]  R Parker,et al.  Deadenylation of the unstable mRNA encoded by the yeast MFA2 gene leads to decapping followed by 5'-->3' digestion of the transcript. , 1994, Genes & development.

[12]  W. Dougherty,et al.  Genetic and biochemical dissection of transgenic RNA-mediated virus resistance. , 1996, The Plant cell.

[13]  C. Dehio,et al.  Identification of plant genetic loci involved in a posttranscriptional mechanism for meiotically reversible transgene silencing. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  T. Voelker,et al.  Expression analysis of a pseudogene in transgenic tobacco: a frameshift mutation prevents mRNA accumulation. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[15]  M. Metzlaff,et al.  RNA-Mediated RNA Degradation and Chalcone Synthase A Silencing in Petunia , 1997, Cell.

[16]  C. Napoli,et al.  A Responsive Regulatory System is Revealed by Sense Suppression of Pigment Genes in Petunia Flowers , 1996 .

[17]  W. Dougherty,et al.  Transgenes and gene suppression: telling us something new? , 1995, Current opinion in cell biology.

[18]  Robertus Antonius Maria de Bruin,et al.  Post-transcriptional silencing of chalcone synthase in petunia by inverted transgene repeats , 1997 .

[19]  C. Kunz,et al.  Developmentally regulated silencing and reactivation of tobacco chitinase transgene expression , 1996 .

[20]  M. Van Montagu,et al.  Post-transcriptional cosuppression of beta-1,3-glucanase genes does not affect accumulation of transgene nuclear mRNA. , 1995, The Plant cell.

[21]  R. Jorgensen.  Cosuppression, Flower Color Patterns, and Metastable Gene Expression States , 1995, Science.

[22]  F. Nagy,et al.  Multiple cis regulatory elements for maximal expression of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter in transgenic plants. , 1989, The Plant cell.

[23]  G. Caponigro,et al.  Mechanisms and control of mRNA turnover in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1996, Microbiological reviews.

[24]  H. Vaucheret,et al.  Gene silencing mediated by promoter homology occurs at the level of transcription and results in meiotically heritable alterations in methylation and gene activity. , 1996, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[25]  D. Inzé,et al.  Suppression of beta‐1,3‐glucanase transgene expression in homozygous plants. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[26]  D. Baulcombe,et al.  Suppression of Virus Accumulation in Transgenic Plants Exhibiting Silencing of Nuclear Genes. , 1996, The Plant cell.

[27]  H. Vaucheret,et al.  Expression of single copies of a strongly expressed 35S transgene can be silenced post-transcriptionally , 1996 .

[28]  A. van Hoof,et al.  Premature nonsense codons decrease the stability of phytohemagglutinin mRNA in a position-dependent manner. , 1996, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[29]  J. Mol,et al.  Flavonoid genes in petunia: addition of a limited number of gene copies may lead to a suppression of gene expression. , 1990, The Plant cell.

[30]  M. Matzke,et al.  How and Why Do Plants Inactivate Homologous (Trans)genes? , 1995, Plant physiology.