Searching for criteria in evaluating the monofin swimming turn from the perspective of coaching and improving technique.

This study aims to analysise the selected kinematic parameters of the monofin swimming turn. The high complexity of performing turns is hindered by the large surface of the monofin, which disturbs control and sense of the body in water. A lack of objective data available on monofin swimming turns has resulted in field research connected with the specification of parameters needed for the evaluation of the technique. Therefore, turns observed in elite swimmers contain underlying conclusions for objective criteria, ensuring the highest level of coaching and the improving of turns in young swimmers. Six, high level, male swimmers participated in the study. The subject of the analysis was the fastest turn, from one out of three trial turns made after swimming a distance of 25 m. Images of the turns were collected from two cameras located under water in accordance with the procedures of the previous analyses of freestyle turns. The images were digitized and analysed by the SIMI(®)- Movement Analysis System. The interdependency of the total turn time and the remaining recorded parameters, constituted the basis for analysis of the kinematic parameters of five turn phases. The interdependency was measured using r- Pearson's correlation coefficients. The novel character of the subject covered in this study, forced interpretation of the results on the basis of turn analyses in freestyle swimming. The results allow for the creation of a diagram outlinig area of search for an effective and efficient monofin swimming turn mechanism. The activities performed from the moment of wall contact until the commencement of stroking seem to be crucial for turn improvement. A strong belief has resulted that, the correct monofin swimming turn, is more than just a simple consequence of the fastest performance of all its components. The most important criteria in evaluating the quality of the monofin swimming turn are: striving for the optimal extension of wall contact time, push-off time and glide time. Key pointsShort time and large surface of the monofin additionally hinders complexity of the turn performance by disturbance in sensing and controlling body in water. Availability of no objective data on monofin swimming turns resulted in research in the field connected with specifying parameters needed for the technique evaluation.Correct turn technique may help to improve swimming race results.The diagram constructed on the basis of the interdependency of the total turn time and the remaining recorded kinematic parameters should establish the areas of searching for mechanism of effective and efficient monofin swimming turn.The most crucial, from the coaching and improving point of view, seem to be activities which take place from the moment of feet wall contact till the first propulsive movements. Therefore, the high quality of the monofin swimming turn technique is not just a simple consequence of the fastest performance of all its component parts.THE MOST IMPORTANT CRITERIA OF THE QUALITY IN THE MONOFIN SWIMMING TURN TECHNIQUE ARE: striving for extending in the optimum scope of wall contact time, the time of the push-off phase and the glide time.

[1]  J. Videler Fish Swimming , 1993, Springer Netherlands.

[2]  D G Lloyd,et al.  Net forces during tethered simulation of underwater streamlined gliding and kicking techniques of the freestyle turn , 2000, Journal of sports sciences.

[3]  Brian Blanksby,et al.  An analysis of the rollover backstroke turn by age-group swimmers. , 2004, Sports biomechanics.

[4]  James G. Hay,et al.  Stroking techniques of elite swimmers , 1984 .

[5]  Brian Blanksby,et al.  Morphology and Hydrodynamic Resistance in Young Swimmers , 2000 .

[6]  Warren Payne,et al.  A comparison and analysis of traditional and modified freestyle tumble turns by age-group swimmers. , 2000 .

[7]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  Investigating Kinetics in the Freestyle Flip Turn Push-Off , 1999 .

[8]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  An Efficient Swimming Machine , 1995 .

[9]  L. M. Wellock,et al.  Patterns of Human Motion, a Cinematographic Analysis , 1972 .

[10]  H. Hertel,et al.  Structure-form-movement , 1966 .

[11]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  The effect of depth and velocity on drag during the streamlined guide. , 2000 .

[12]  Richard C. Nelson,et al.  Analysis of 50-, 100-, and 200-m Freestyle Swimmers at the 1992 Olympic Games , 1994 .

[13]  J. C. Chatard,et al.  Passive drag is still a good evaluator of swimming aptitude , 2006, European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology.

[14]  B C Elliott,et al.  The influence of plyometric training on the freestyle tumble turn. , 1999, Journal of science and medicine in sport.

[15]  S. Li Biomechanical Study of Fin-swimming and Fins , 1989 .

[16]  Joel M. Stager,et al.  Handbook of Sports Medicine and Science: Swimming , 1993 .

[17]  B. Watier,et al.  A kinematic study of finswimming at surface. , 2004, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[18]  T. C. Luk,et al.  TURNING TECHNIQUE OF ELITE SWIMMERS IN BUTTERFLY AND BREASTSTROKE , 1999 .

[19]  B. Blanksby,et al.  Traditional and modified exits following freestyle tumble turns by skilled swimmers , 2000 .

[20]  Band , 1943 .

[21]  J. Lacour,et al.  The Contribution of Passive Drag as a Determinant of Swimming Performance , 1990, International journal of sports medicine.

[22]  Bruce Mason,et al.  WHAT CAN WE LEARN FROM COMPETITION ANALYSIS AT THE 1999 PAN PACIFIC SWIMMING CHAMPIONSHIPS , 2000 .

[23]  Marek Rejman,et al.  Functional model of monofin swimming technique based on the construction of neural networks. , 2007, Journal of sports science & medicine.

[24]  James G. Hay,et al.  The Biomechanics of Sports Techniques, 2nd Edition , 1982 .

[25]  Bruce Mason,et al.  SWIM START PERFORMANCES AT THE SYDNEY 2000 OLYMPIC GAMES , 2001 .

[26]  A. P. Hollander,et al.  Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming VII , 1996 .

[27]  David G. Lloyd,et al.  The effect of depth and velocity on drag in the streamlined glide , 1999 .

[28]  Brian Blanksby,et al.  Force plate and video analysis of the tumble turn by age-group swimmers , 1996 .

[29]  James G Hay,et al.  The biomechanics of sports techniques , 1973 .

[30]  T. Y. Wu,et al.  Hydromechanics of swimming propulsion. Part 1. Swimming of a two-dimensional flexible plate at variable forward speeds in an inviscid fluid , 1971, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.