The Dimensionality of Organizational Performance and its Implications for Strategic Management Research

Organizational performance is widely recognized as an important – if not the most important – construct in strategic management research. Researchers also agree that organizational performance is a multidimensional construct. However, the research implications of the construct's multidimensionality are less understood. In this chapter, we use a synthesis of previous attempts to describe the dimensions of performance and our own analysis of performance measurement in the Strategic Management Journal to build a conceptual model of organizational performance and its dimensions. Our model suggests that operational performance and organizational performance are distinct, and that organizational performance can be further dimensionalized into accounting returns, stock market, and growth measures. The model has implications for how future research might advance understanding about performance and how empirical studies should conceptualize and measure performance.

[1]  M. Hitt,et al.  Construct measurement in strategic management research: illusion or reality? , 2005 .

[2]  Donald D. Bergh,et al.  Assessment and redirection of longitudinal analysis : Demonstration with a study of the diversification and divestiture relationship , 1997 .

[3]  James G. Combs,et al.  HOW MUCH DO HIGH-PERFORMANCE WORK PRACTICES MATTER? A META-ANALYSIS OF THEIR EFFECTS ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE , 2006 .

[4]  David A. Whetten,et al.  Perceptions of Organizational Effectiveness Over Organizational Life Cycles , 1981 .

[5]  Henry L. Tosi,et al.  How Much Does Performance Matter? A Meta-Analysis of CEO Pay Studies , 2000 .

[6]  R E Miles,et al.  Organizational strategy, structure, and process. , 1978, Academy of management review. Academy of Management.

[7]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[8]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Theories: Some Criteria for Evaluation , 1989 .

[9]  A. Huff,et al.  STRATEGIC GROUPS: A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE , 1993 .

[10]  Timothy G. Pollock,et al.  EFFECTS OF SOCIAL CAPITAL AND POWER ON SURVIVING TRANSFORMATIONAL CHANGE: THE CASE OF INITIAL PUBLIC OFFERINGS , 2004 .

[11]  Robert N. Stern,et al.  The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. , 1979 .

[12]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[13]  Marjorie A. Lyles,et al.  Absorptive capacity, learning, and performance in international joint ventures , 2001 .

[14]  Janine S. Hiller,et al.  Competitiveness through Management of Diversity: Effects on Stock Price Valuation , 1995 .

[15]  Gongming Qian,et al.  Profitability of small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in high‐tech industries: the case of the biotechnology industry , 2003 .

[16]  P. Bak,et al.  Learning from mistakes , 1997, Neuroscience.

[17]  K. Cameron.  Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[18]  Dean A. Shepherd,et al.  RESEARCH NOTES AND COMMENTARIES: KNOWLEDGE-BASED RESOURCES, ENTREPRENEURIAL ORIENTATION, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF SMALL AND MEDIUM-SIZED BUSINESSES , 2003 .

[19]  Brian K. Boyd,et al.  THE STATE OF STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND A VISION OF THE FUTURE , 2004 .

[20]  Jeff W. Trailer,et al.  Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research , 1996 .

[21]  William S. Schulze,et al.  A social capital model of high growth ventures , 2003 .

[22]  K. Andrews.  The Concept of Corporate Strategy , 1971 .

[23]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Data analytic trends and training in strategic management , 2003 .

[24]  Gerald E. Fryxell,et al.  Temporal and Contextual Change in the Measurement Structure of Financial Performance: Implications for Strategy Research , 1990 .

[25]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  Curvilinearity in the diversification–performance linkage: an examination of over three decades of research , 2000 .

[26]  A. Meyer.  What Is Strategy's Distinctive Competence? , 1991 .

[27]  M. Frese,et al.  Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review , 2011 .

[28]  Ulf R. Andersson,et al.  The strategic impact of external networks: Subsidiary performance and competence development in the multinational corporation , 2002 .

[29]  D. Shepherd,et al.  Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses , 2003 .

[30]  Kevin D. Carlson,et al.  STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH AND THE CUMULATIVE KNOWLEDGE PERSPECTIVE , 2004 .

[31]  L. Hedges,et al.  Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis , 1987 .

[32]  Donald P. Schwab,et al.  Research Methods for Organizational Studies , 1998 .

[33]  Richard L. Priem,et al.  Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research? , 2001 .

[34]  L. Dyer,et al.  Human resource strategies and firm performance: what do we know and where do we need to go? , 1995 .

[35]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[36]  Jonathan L. Johnson,et al.  META-ANALYTIC REVIEWS OF BOARD COMPOSITION, LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE, AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE , 1998 .

[37]  J. Guthrie.  High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[38]  John H. Grant,et al.  Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal , 1986 .

[39]  Richard Makadok,et al.  Interfirm differences in scale economies and the evolution of market shares , 1999 .

[40]  David J. Flanagan,et al.  Determinants of Layoff Announcements Following M&As: An Empirical Investigation , 1998 .

[41]  A. Shenhar,et al.  Beyond the Balanced Scorecard:: Refining the Search for Organizational Success Measures , 2003 .

[42]  C. Campbell-Hunt.  What have we learned about generic competitive strategy? A meta‐analysis , 2000 .

[43]  B. Chakravarthy.  Measuring strategic performance , 1986 .

[44]  Todd R. Zenger,et al.  Testing Alternative Theories of the Firm: Transaction Cost, Knowledge-Based, and Measurement Explanations for Make-or- Buy Decisions in Information Services , 1997 .

[45]  L. Capron.  The long‐term performance of horizontal acquisitions , 1999 .

[46]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  The impact of alternative operationalizations of industry structural elements on measures of performance for entrepreneurial manufacturing ventures , 1998 .

[47]  R. T. Lenz.  ‘Determinants’ of organizational performance: An interdisciplinary review , 1981 .

[48]  R. Coff.  When Competitive Advantage Doesn't Lead to Performance: The Resource-Based View and Stakeholder Bargaining Power , 1999 .

[49]  D. Yermack,et al.  CEO Involvement in the Selection of New Board Members: An Empirical Analysis , 1998 .

[50]  A. Lewin,et al.  Determining organizational effectiveness: another look, and an agenda for research , 1986 .

[51]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis , 1989 .

[52]  John Hudson.  An analysis of company liquidations , 1986 .

[53]  Daniel F. Jennings.  Strategy, Structure, and Performance , 2000 .

[54]  T. Jick.  Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action. , 1979 .

[55]  William H. Starbuck,et al.  Methodological Challenges Posed by Measures of Performance , 2004 .

[56]  Richard M. Steers.  Problems in the Measurement of Organizational Effectiveness , 1975 .

[57]  G. Hendrikse.  Fundamental Issues in Strategy , 1995 .

[58]  Steven C. Michael,et al.  Franchising: A Review and Avenues to Greater Theoretical Diversity , 2004 .

[59]  P. Nystrom,et al.  Measuring Organizational Growth: Issues, Consequences and Guidelines , 1998 .