Impact of the filling status of the bladder and rectum on their integral dose distribution and the movement of the uterus in the treatment planning of gynaecological cancer.

PURPOSE Determination of the impact of the filling status of the organs at risk (bladder and rectum) on the uterus mobility and on their integral dose distribution in radiotherapy of gynaecological cancer. METHODS In 29 women suffering from cervical or endometrial cancer two CT scans were carried out for treatment planning, one with an empty bladder and rectum, the second one with bladder and rectum filled. The volumes of the organs at risk were calculated and in 14 patients, receiving a definitive radiotherapy, the position of the uterus within the pelvis was shown using multiplanar reconstructions. After generation of a 3D treatment plan the dose volume histograms were compared for empty and filled organs at risk. RESULTS The mobility for the corpus uteri with/without bladder and rectum filling was in median 7 mm (95%-confidence interval: 3-15 mm) in cranial/caudal direction and 4 mm (0-9 mm) in posterior/anterior direction. Likewise, cervical mobility was observed to be 4 mm (-1-6 mm) mm in cranial/caudal direction. A full bladder led to a mean reduction in organ dose in median from 94-87% calculated for 50% of the bladder volume (P < 0.05, Wilcoxon's matched-pairs signed-ranks test). For 66% of the bladder volume the dose could be reduced in median from 78 to 61% (P < 0.005) and for the whole bladder from 42 to 39% (P < 0.005), respectively. No significant contribution of the filling status of the rectum to its integral dose burden was noticed. CONCLUSIONS Due to the mobility of the uterus increased margins between CTV and PTV superiorly, inferiorly, anteriorly and posteriorly of 15, 6 and 9 mm each, respectively, should be used. A full bladder is the prerequisite for an integral dose reduction.

[1]  G. Stuecklschweiger,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix: analysis of complications after primary external beam radiation and Ir-192 HDR brachytherapy. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  P Kijewski,et al.  Analysis of prostate and seminal vesicle motion: implications for treatment planning. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Evaluation of changes in the size and location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, and rectum during a course of external beam radiation therapy. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  P. Grigsby,et al.  Anatomic variation of gynecologic brachytherapy prescription points. , 1993, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  C. Orton,et al.  Dose dependence of complication rates in cervix cancer radiotherapy. , 1986, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  V. Althof,et al.  Variation in prostate position relative to adjacent bony anatomy. , 1996, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[8]  M van Herk,et al.  Quantification of organ motion during conformal radiotherapy of the prostate by three dimensional image registration. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  T. Ganesh,et al.  Results of radical radiotherapy in carcinoma of the uterine cervix stage I-III. , 1994, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[10]  M van Herk,et al.  Variation in volumes, dose-volume histograms, and estimated normal tissue complication probabilities of rectum and bladder during conformal radiotherapy of T3 prostate cancer. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  R J Dowsett,et al.  Contouring structures for 3-dimensional treatment planning. , 1992, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  C. Hess,et al.  [Dosage specification at the ICRU reference point: the consequences for clinical practice. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements]. , 1993, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al].

[13]  S. Spencer,et al.  Conventional four-field pelvic radiotherapy technique without computed tomography-treatment planning in cancer of the cervix: potential geographic miss and its impact on pelvic control. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[14]  J. Overgaard,et al.  Early and late radiotherapeutic morbidity in 442 consecutive patients with locally advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix. , 1994, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  C H Ketting,et al.  Consistency of three-dimensional planning target volumes across physicians and institutions. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  M. Elhilali,et al.  Urorectodynamic evaluation of healthy volunteers. , 1982, Urology.

[17]  S L Schoeppel,et al.  Treatment planning issues related to prostate movement in response to differential filling of the rectum and bladder. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  P. Hoskin,et al.  Changes in applicator position with fractionated high dose rate gynaecological brachytherapy. , 1996, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  Icru Prescribing, recording, and reporting photon beam therapy , 1993 .

[20]  G. Montana,et al.  Carcinoma of the cervix: analysis of bladder and rectal radiation dose and complications. , 1989, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.