Finite element analysis applied to 3-T MR imaging of proximal femur microarchitecture: lower bone strength in patients with fragility fractures compared with control subjects.

PURPOSE To determine the feasibility of using finite element analysis applied to 3-T magnetic resonance (MR) images of proximal femur microarchitecture for detection of lower bone strength in subjects with fragility fractures compared with control subjects without fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective study was institutional review board approved and HIPAA compliant. Written informed consent was obtained. Postmenopausal women with (n = 22) and without (n = 22) fragility fractures were matched for age and body mass index. All subjects underwent standard dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Images of proximal femur microarchitecture were obtained by using a high-spatial-resolution three-dimensional fast low-angle shot sequence at 3 T. Finite element analysis was applied to compute elastic modulus as a measure of strength in the femoral head and neck, Ward triangle, greater trochanter, and intertrochanteric region. The Mann-Whitney test was used to compare bone mineral density T scores and elastic moduli between the groups. The relationship (R(2)) between elastic moduli and bone mineral density T scores was assessed. RESULTS Patients with fractures showed lower elastic modulus than did control subjects in all proximal femur regions (femoral head, 8.51-8.73 GPa vs 9.32-9.67 GPa; P = .04; femoral neck, 3.11-3.72 GPa vs 4.39-4.82 GPa; P = .04; Ward triangle, 1.85-2.21 GPa vs 3.98-4.13 GPa; P = .04; intertrochanteric region, 1.62-2.18 GPa vs 3.86-4.47 GPa; P = .006-.007; greater trochanter, 0.65-1.21 GPa vs 1.96-2.62 GPa; P = .01-.02), but no differences in bone mineral density T scores. There were weak relationships between elastic moduli and bone mineral density T scores in patients with fractures (R(2) = 0.25-0.31, P = .02-.04), but not in control subjects. CONCLUSION Finite element analysis applied to high-spatial-resolution 3-T MR images of proximal femur microarchitecture can allow detection of lower elastic modulus, a marker of bone strength, in subjects with fragility fractures compared with control subjects. MR assessment of proximal femur strength may provide information about bone quality that is not provided by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

[1]  S. Cummings,et al.  Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. , 2002, JAMA.

[2]  Jeremy Magland,et al.  Implications of noise and resolution on mechanical properties of trabecular bone estimated by image‐based finite‐element analysis , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[3]  R. Weinstein,et al.  Decreased trabecular width and increased trabecular spacing contribute to bone loss with aging. , 1987, Bone.

[4]  X. Guo,et al.  Mechanical consequence of trabecular bone loss and its treatment: a three-dimensional model simulation. , 2002, Bone.

[5]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo Determination of Bone Structure in Postmenopausal Women: A Comparison of HR‐pQCT and High‐Field MR Imaging , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[6]  J. Cauley,et al.  Hip fracture in women without osteoporosis. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[7]  A. Tosteson,et al.  Incidence and Economic Burden of Osteoporosis‐Related Fractures in the United States, 2005–2025 , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[8]  Ralph Müller,et al.  Contribution of In Vivo Structural Measurements and Load/Strength Ratios to the Determination of Forearm Fracture Risk in Postmenopausal Women , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  X. Guo,et al.  Assessment of trabecular and cortical architecture and mechanical competence of bone by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography: comparison with transiliac bone biopsy , 2009, Osteoporosis International.

[10]  Michael Hahn,et al.  Architecture and distribution of cancellous bone yield vertebral fracture clues , 1996, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[11]  Bert Van Rietbergen,et al.  Finite Element Analysis Based on In Vivo HR‐pQCT Images of the Distal Radius Is Associated With Wrist Fracture in Postmenopausal Women , 2007, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[12]  J. Kanis,et al.  Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk , 2002, The Lancet.

[13]  Thomas M Link,et al.  osteoporosis imaging : State of the Art and Advanced Imaging 1 , 2022 .

[14]  D M Eddy,et al.  Screening for osteoporosis. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[15]  Felix Eckstein,et al.  Impact of coil design on the contrast‐to‐noise ratio, precision, and consistency of quantitative cartilage morphometry at 3 Tesla: A pilot study for the osteoarthritis initiative , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[16]  S. Cummings,et al.  BMD at Multiple Sites and Risk of Fracture of Multiple Types: Long‐Term Results From the Study of Osteoporotic Fractures , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[17]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Changes in Calcaneal Trabecular Bone Structure Assessed with High-Resolution MR Imaging in Patients with Kidney Transplantation , 2002, Osteoporosis International.

[18]  S. Goldstein,et al.  Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  Gregory Chang,et al.  Comparison of a 28‐channel receive array coil and quadrature volume coil for morphologic imaging and T2 mapping of knee cartilage at 7T , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  Guo X. Edward,et al.  Is Trabecular Bone Tissue Different from Cortical Bone Tissue , 1998 .

[21]  Jeremy F Magland,et al.  Micro-MR imaging-based computational biomechanics demonstrates reduction in cortical and trabecular bone strength after renal transplantation. , 2012, Radiology.

[22]  A. Hofman,et al.  Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. , 2004, Bone.

[23]  R. Lindsay,et al.  A simple method for correlative light and scanning electron microscopy of human iliac crest bone biopsies: Qualitative observations in normal and osteoporotic subjects , 1986, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[24]  C. S. Rajapakse,et al.  Micro-finite element analysis applied to high-resolution MRI reveals improved bone mechanical competence in the distal femur of female pre-professional dancers , 2013, Osteoporosis International.

[25]  L. Mosekilde.  Age-related changes in vertebral trabecular bone architecture--assessed by a new method. , 1988, Bone.

[26]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  In vivo assessment of trabecular bone microarchitecture by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography. , 2005, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[27]  Felix W. Wehrli,et al.  A novel local thresholding algorithm for trabecular bone volume fraction mapping in the limited spatial resolution regime of in vivo MRI , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  L. Wald,et al.  Theory and application of array coils in MR spectroscopy , 1997, NMR in biomedicine.

[29]  H. Macdonald,et al.  Women with previous fragility fractures can be classified based on bone microarchitecture and finite element analysis measured with HR-pQCT , 2013, Osteoporosis International.

[30]  V. Gudnason,et al.  Male-female differences in the association between incident hip fracture and proximal femoral strength: a finite element analysis study. , 2011, Bone.

[31]  S. Cummings.  Are patients with hip fractures more osteoporotic? Review of the evidence. , 1985, The American journal of medicine.

[32]  M. Reiser,et al.  Prediction of the fracture load of whole proximal femur specimens by topological analysis of the mineral distribution in DXA-scan images. , 2008, Bone.

[33]  Paul Sajda,et al.  Accuracy of high‐resolution in vivo micro magnetic resonance imaging for measurements of microstructural and mechanical properties of human distal tibial bone , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[34]  T. Keaveny,et al.  Biomechanical computed tomography—noninvasive bone strength analysis using clinical computed tomography scans , 2010, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[35]  W. Skalli,et al.  Volumetric quantitative computed tomography of the proximal femur: relationships linking geometric and densitometric variables to bone strength. Role for compact bone , 2006, Osteoporosis International.

[36]  J. Polimeni,et al.  96‐Channel receive‐only head coil for 3 Tesla: Design optimization and evaluation , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Gregory Chang,et al.  In vivo estimation of bone stiffness at the distal femur and proximal tibia using ultra-high-field 7-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging and micro-finite element analysis , 2012, Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.

[38]  S. Jamal,et al.  Low bone mineral density and fracture burden in postmenopausal women , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[39]  T. Perneger.  What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments , 1998, BMJ.

[40]  O. Johnell,et al.  Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures , 1996 .

[41]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Trabecular Bone Architecture in the Distal Radius Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Subjects with Fractures of the Proximal Femur , 1999, Osteoporosis International.

[42]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  A Longitudinal HR-pQCT Study of Alendronate Treatment in Postmenopausal Women With Low Bone Density: Relations Among Density, Cortical and Trabecular Microarchitecture, Biomechanics, and Bone Turnover , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[43]  Thomas Baum,et al.  Generation of an atlas of the proximal femur and its application to trabecular bone analysis , 2011, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[44]  D. Dempster.  Bone microarchitecture and strength , 2003, Osteoporosis International.

[45]  Jeremy F Magland,et al.  Mechanical Implications of Estrogen Supplementation in Early Postmenopausal Women , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[46]  M. Bouxsein,et al.  Quantifying the material and structural determinants of bone strength. , 2009, Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology.

[47]  M. Kleerekoper,et al.  The role of three-dimensional trabecular microstructure in the pathogenesis of vertebral compression fractures , 1985, Calcified Tissue International.

[48]  F. Wehrli.  Structural and functional assessment of trabecular and cortical bone by micro magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[49]  Jeremy F Magland,et al.  Computational biomechanics of the distal tibia from high-resolution MR and micro-CT images. , 2010, Bone.

[50]  M. Pithioux,et al.  Combination of texture analysis and bone mineral density improves the prediction of fracture load in human femurs , 2011, Osteoporosis International.

[51]  Elise F. Morgan,et al.  Use of finite element analysis to assess bone strength , 2005 .

[52]  Harry K. Genant,et al.  Consensus development conference: diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. , 1993, The American journal of medicine.

[53]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Trabecular Bone Structure , 2002, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[54]  Sharmila Majumdar,et al.  Heterogeneity of bone microstructure in the femoral head in patients with osteoporosis: an ex vivo HR-pQCT study. , 2013, Bone.

[55]  Shreyasee Amin,et al.  Age-Dependence of Femoral Strength in White Women and Men , 2009, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[56]  Roland Krug,et al.  Feasibility of in vivo structural analysis of high-resolution magnetic resonance images of the proximal femur , 2005, Osteoporosis International.

[57]  Ning Zhang,et al.  Computationally-Optimized Bone Mechanical Modeling from High-Resolution Structural Images , 2012, PloS one.

[58]  Christina Triantafyllou,et al.  A 128‐channel receive‐only cardiac coil for highly accelerated cardiac MRI at 3 Tesla , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[59]  A. Wright,et al.  Role of Magnetic Resonance for Assessing Structure and Function of Trabecular Bone , 2002, Topics in magnetic resonance imaging : TMRI.

[60]  H. Song,et al.  Cancellous bone volume and structure in the forearm: noninvasive assessment with MR microimaging and image processing. , 1998, Radiology.

[61]  Ravinder R Regatte,et al.  Feasibility of three‐dimensional MRI of proximal femur microarchitecture at 3 tesla using 26 receive elements without and with parallel imaging , 2014, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[62]  S. Majumdar,et al.  In Vivo High Resolution MRI of the Calcaneus: Differences in Trabecular Structure in Osteoporosis Patients , 1998, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[63]  Adi Cohen,et al.  Bone density, geometry, microstructure, and stiffness: Relationships between peripheral and central skeletal sites assessed by DXA, HR‐pQCT, and cQCT in premenopausal women , 2010, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[64]  L. Wald,et al.  32‐channel 3 Tesla receive‐only phased‐array head coil with soccer‐ball element geometry , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.