Seismic response mitigation of structures with a friction pendulum inerter system

Abstract Introducing a tuned mass damper (TMD) into the friction pendulum system (FPS) has been proven to be an effective approach for improving the seismic performances of base-isolated structures. However, its seismic response mitigation effect is related to the quality of the mass employed, which unavoidably requires a necessary large mass under the requirement of a high seismic performance level. To avoid introducing the extra mass of the tuned mass damper (TMD) in the friction pendulum system (FPS) of a base-isolated structure, we herein introduce a lightweight inerter subsystem that has a series-parallel layout; comprises an inerter, a spring, and a damping element; and adds almost no mass. A structure isolated by the proposed friction pendulum inerter system (FPIS) was studied by nonlinear stochastic response analysis within a probabilistic framework, and an optimal design method for a structure with the FPIS was developed to simultaneously reduce the base shear force and the base isolation floor displacement. Based on the stochastic analysis results, parametric studies and a robustness analysis were conducted, and the impact of the FPIS’s mechanical layout on the seismic response mitigation effect was investigated. The analysis results demonstrated that the FPIS significantly reduced structural responses under different types of seismic excitations. Using the proposed optimal design method, target base shear force can be achieved at a minimized cost to the base isolation floor displacement. Compared to the FPS system with a TMD, the proposed FPIS enhances the seismic response mitigation effect by avoiding the extra mass that increases the seismic energy input to the base isolation floor.

[1]  Gian Michele Calvi,et al.  Historical development of friction-based seismic isolation systems , 2018 .

[2]  M. K. Shrimali,et al.  Assessment of proposed lateral load patterns in pushover analysis for base-isolated frames , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[3]  井上 豊,et al.  ボールネジを用いた制震装置の開発 : その1 制震チューブ・制震ディスクの性能試験 , 1999 .

[4]  Akira Igarashi,et al.  Dynamic response control of multi-story structures by isolators with multiple plane sliding surfaces: A parametric study , 2012 .

[5]  Antonina Pirrotta,et al.  Earthquake Excited Base-Isolated Structures Protected by Tuned Liquid Column Dampers: Design Approach and Experimental Verification , 2017 .

[6]  Weiqiu Zhu,et al.  Nonlinear Stochastic Dynamics and Control in Hamiltonian Formulation , 2006 .

[7]  Kohei Fujita,et al.  Innovative base-isolated building with large mass-ratio TMD at basement for greater earthquake resilience , 2015 .

[8]  Shigeki Nakaminami,et al.  VIBRATION TESTS OF 1-STORY RESPONSE CONTROL SYSTEM USING INERTIAL MASS AND OPTIMIZED SOFTY SPRING AND VISCOUS ELEMENT , 2008 .

[9]  Kohju Ikago,et al.  Seismic control of single‐degree‐of‐freedom structure using tuned viscous mass damper , 2012 .

[10]  D. De Domenico,et al.  An enhanced base isolation system equipped with optimal tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) , 2018 .

[11]  Giuseppe Mancini,et al.  Seismic reliability-based robustness assessment of three-dimensional reinforced concrete systems equipped with single-concave sliding devices , 2018 .

[12]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Behaviour of the double concave Friction Pendulum bearing , 2006 .

[13]  Enrico Tubaldi,et al.  Influence of ground motion characteristics on the optimal single concave sliding bearing properties for base-isolated structures , 2018 .

[14]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Direct design method based on seismic capacity redundancy for structures with metal yielding dampers , 2018 .

[15]  D. De Domenico,et al.  Analytical and finite element investigation on the thermo-mechanical coupled response of friction isolators under bidirectional excitation , 2018 .

[16]  Giuseppe Ricciardi,et al.  Earthquake-resilient design of base isolated buildings with TMD at basement: Application to a case study , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[17]  C. S. Tsai,et al.  Component and shaking table tests for full‐scale multiple friction pendulum system , 2006 .

[18]  Paolo Castaldo,et al.  Seismic reliability-based ductility demand for hardening and softening structures isolated by friction pendulum bearings , 2018, Structural Control and Health Monitoring.

[19]  K. Dai,et al.  Seismic response mitigation of a wind turbine tower using a tuned parallel inerter mass system , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[20]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  Assessing the effect of nonlinearities on the performance of a tuned inerter damper , 2017 .

[21]  Kohju Ikago,et al.  APPLICATION OF VISCOUS MASS DAMPER WITH FORCE RESTRICTION MECHANISM TO BASE-ISOLATED STRUCTURES AND ITS EFFECTIVENESS , 2011 .

[22]  Anil K. Chopra,et al.  Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering , 1995 .

[23]  D. De Domenico,et al.  Optimal design and seismic performance of tuned mass damper inerter (TMDI) for structures with nonlinear base isolation systems , 2018, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[24]  Donatello Cardone,et al.  Restoring capability of friction pendulum seismic isolation systems , 2015, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[25]  Malcolm C. Smith Synthesis of mechanical networks: the inerter , 2002, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[26]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Influence of mechanical layout of inerter systems on seismic mitigation of storage tanks , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[27]  Yu Bao,et al.  Extreme behavior in a triple friction pendulum isolated frame , 2017 .

[28]  K. Ikago,et al.  FULL-SCALE DYNAMIC TESTS OF TUNED VISCOUS MASS DAMPER WITH FORCE RESTRICTION MECHANISM AND ITS ANALYTICAL VERIFICATION , 2011 .

[29]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Demand‐based optimal design of oscillator with parallel‐layout viscous inerter damper , 2018 .

[30]  Sara Casciati,et al.  Design of a TMD solution to mitigate wind-induced local vibrations in an existing timber footbridge , 2015 .

[31]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Design of structure with inerter system based on stochastic response mitigation ratio , 2018 .

[32]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  A particle inerter system for structural seismic response mitigation , 2019, J. Frankl. Inst..

[33]  Fu-Cheng Wang,et al.  Performance Benefits in Passive Vehicle Suspensions Employing Inerters , 2004 .

[34]  Stephen Lynch,et al.  Dynamical Systems with Applications using Mathematica , 2007 .

[35]  Akira Nishitani,et al.  Optimum design for more effective tuned mass damper system and its application to base‐isolated buildings , 2014 .

[36]  M. De Angelis,et al.  Optimal design and performance evaluation of systems with Tuned Mass Damper Inerter (TMDI) , 2017 .

[37]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Impact of soil–structure interaction on structures with inerter system , 2018, Journal of Sound and Vibration.

[38]  Chao Pan,et al.  Target-based algorithm for baseline correction of inconsistent vibration signals , 2018 .

[39]  Paolo Castaldo,et al.  Influence of soil conditions on the optimal sliding friction coefficient for isolated bridges , 2018, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[40]  Ruifu Zhang,et al.  Mitigation of liquid sloshing in storage tanks by using a hybrid control method , 2016 .

[41]  Agathoklis Giaralis,et al.  Optimal tuned mass‐damper‐inerter (TMDI) design for seismically excited MDOF structures with model uncertainties based on reliability criteria , 2018 .