Technology-Based Design and Sustainable Economic Growth

This paper seeks to analyze how design creates economic value. The literature on knowledge-based economic development has primarily focused on innovation as the analytical lens, whereas design is the original action that leads to innovation. Despite the fundamental importance of design, existing design research has offered few insights and little guidance for national strategies due to the lack of focus on and analysis of design in an economic context. This paper addresses such gaps by linking design research and economic development theory. We first elaborate on the relationship among design, invention and innovation, describing the necessity of design activity for invention and innovation. Our analysis of the fundamental characteristics of design across contexts sheds light on the strategic importance of the accumulative nature of technology-based design for sustaining economic growth. Through the lens of technology-based design, we further quantitatively compare Singapore and three similarly-sized countries (South Korea, Finland and Taiwan). Based upon interview data, we also qualitatively examine Singapore’s national strategy focusing on design. The quantitative and qualitative results align well with the Singaporean government’s use of design as a strategic lever to pursue innovation-driven economic growth, and also reveal its achievements and shortfalls which indicate possible directions for strategic adjustment.

[1]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[2]  M. Downs,et al.  Paths to Innovation , 2014 .

[3]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[4]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Paths of Innovation: The Institutionalization of Innovation, 1900–90 , 1998 .

[5]  Jason Tan,et al.  Shaping Singapore's future : thinking schools, learning nation , 2005 .

[6]  R. J. Bogumil,et al.  The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action , 1985, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Sidney G. Winter,et al.  The satisficing principle in capability learning , 2000 .

[8]  Frederick P. Brooks,et al.  The Design of Design: Essays from a Computer Scientist , 2010 .

[9]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Creative Expertise as Superior Reproducible Performance: Innovative and Flexible Aspects of Expert Performance , 1999 .

[10]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and Productivity: The Econometric Evidence , 2007 .

[11]  K. Huang,et al.  China's Innovation Landscape , 2010, Science.

[12]  Kuan Yew Lee From Third World to First: The Singapore Story: 1965-2000, Singapore and the Asian Economic Boom , 2000 .

[13]  L. Argote Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining and Transferring Knowledge , 1999 .

[14]  Edgar C. Schein Strategic Pragmatism: The Culture of Singapore's Economics Development Board , 1996 .

[15]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Innovation in Industry and the Diffusion of Technology , 1974, Science.

[16]  Bengt-Arne Vedin,et al.  Design-Inspired Innovation , 2006 .

[17]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[18]  Jinyoun Kim,et al.  Labor Mobility of Scientists, Technological Diffusion, and the Firm's Patenting Decision , 2001 .

[19]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Dominant Designs, Technological Cycles and Organizational Outcomes , 2002 .

[20]  R. Solow TECHNICAL CHANGE AND THE AGGREGATE PRODUCTION FUNCTION , 1957 .

[21]  Christopher Alexander Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[22]  Johann Peter Murmann,et al.  Dominant Designs, Technology Cycles, and Organization Outcomes. , 1998 .

[23]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[24]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[25]  Kristin L. Wood,et al.  Innovations in Design Through Transformation: A Fundamental Study of Transformation Principles , 2009 .

[26]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A functional approach for studying technological progress: Application to information technology ☆ , 2006 .

[27]  Paul J. Feltovich,et al.  Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices , 1981, Cogn. Sci..

[28]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[29]  Clive L. Dym,et al.  Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views , 1994 .

[30]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[31]  John R. Dixon,et al.  A review of research in mechanical engineering design. Part II: Representations, analysis, and design for the life cycle , 1989 .

[32]  C. Freeman The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[33]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[34]  D. Schoen,et al.  The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action , 1985 .

[35]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[36]  Vivien Walsh,et al.  Design, innovation and the boundaries of the firm , 1996 .

[37]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm , 2011 .

[38]  John Hagedoorn,et al.  Innovation and entrepreneurship: Schumpeter revisited. , 1996 .

[39]  R. Weisberg Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts , 2006 .

[40]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Architecture-Based Comparative Advantage — A Design Information View of Manufacturing , 2007 .

[41]  Kathleen M. Eisenhardt,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES, WHAT ARE THEY? , 2000 .

[42]  Jeffrey L. Furman,et al.  The Determinants of National Innovative Capacity , 2000 .

[43]  M. Hobday,et al.  Policies for design and policies for innovation: contrasting perspectives and remaining challenges , 2012 .

[44]  Steven Klepper,et al.  The Origin and Growth of Industry Clusters: The Making of Silicon Valley and Detroit , 2010 .

[45]  José Guimón,et al.  Policies to benefit from the globalization of corporate R&D: An exploratory study for EU countries , 2011 .

[46]  R. Solow A Contribution to the Theory of Economic Growth , 1956 .

[47]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[48]  Busayawan Lam,et al.  Design-Driven Innovation , 2014 .

[49]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  The Sciences of Design: Observations on an Emerging Field , 2008, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[50]  Joseph Martino Examples of technological trend forecasting for research and development planning , 1971 .

[51]  Raimar Richers The theory of economic development , 1961 .

[52]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[53]  K. Green National innovation systems: a comparative analysis , 1996 .

[54]  Gavin J. Wright An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[55]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Toward a Systematic Framework for Research on Dominant Designs, Technological Innovations, and Industrial Change , 2005 .

[56]  Brian Kahin,et al.  Between “Knowledge” and “The Economy”: Notes on the Scientific Study of Designs , 2006 .

[57]  N. Rosenberg Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910 , 1963, The Journal of Economic History.

[58]  J. Steehler Understanding Moore's Law—Four Decades of Innovation (David C. Brock, ed.) , 2007 .

[59]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  The Misalignment of Product Architecture and Organizational Structure in Complex Product Development , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[60]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1 , 1999 .

[61]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  A functional approach for studying technological progress: Extension to energy technology , 2008 .

[62]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow , 2002 .

[63]  M. Porter The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[64]  Daniel D. Frey,et al.  The Pugh Controlled Convergence method: model-based evaluation and implications for design theory , 2009 .

[65]  A. Saxenian The origins and dynamics of production networks in Silicon Valley , 1991 .

[66]  Marina Candi,et al.  Oil in water? Explaining differences in aesthetic design emphasis in new technology-based firms , 2008 .

[67]  R. Rothwell,et al.  Design and innovation : policy and management , 1985 .

[68]  W. Nordhaus Two Centuries of Productivity Growth in Computing , 2007, The Journal of Economic History.

[69]  D. Coghlan Strategic Pragmatism: The Culture of Singapore's Economic Development Board , 1996 .

[70]  Arthur B. Markman,et al.  INCREASING INNOVATION: PRESENTATION AND EVALUATION OF THE WORDTREE DESIGN- BY-ANALOGY METHOD , 2008 .

[71]  T. Sturgeon How Silicon Valley Came to Be , 2000 .

[72]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[73]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial - 3rd Edition , 1981 .

[74]  A. D. D. Groot Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[75]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[76]  G. Dosi,et al.  Technical Change and Economic Theory , 1989 .

[77]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .